CariDotMy

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

12Next
Return to list New
View: 8799|Reply: 28

Kes restoran nasi dagang sheila rusly - selesai

[Copy link]
Post time 2-4-2011 10:30 AM | Show all posts |Read mode
Saturday April 2, 2011
Tussle over nasi dagang restaurant business settled


KUALA LUMPUR: The legal tussle between actress Sheila Rusly and her former business partner Datuk Azlina Che Abdullah over their nasi dagang restaurant business drew to a close after the High Court ruled that profits of the restaurant be split 57% and 43% respectively.

In a judgment read out by deputy registrar Hamidah Md Deril on Thursday, the court ordered Azlina to present all the accounts and records of Restoran Nasi Dagang House for the period between July 11 and Sept 30, 2005, for auditing within two weeks of the judgment.

He ordered that 57% of the profits to be distributed to Sheila, and 43% to Azlina, based on the capital investment of RM55,000 (by Sheila) and RM23,800 (by Azlina) respectively.

The court also ruled that the oral agreement between both parties had now been dissolved.

Further, the judgment which was made available to the press yesterday, also ordered Azlina to present all accounts and records of the new restaurant, Nasi Dagang Ulik Mayang, from Oct 1, 2005 up till Thursday, for auditing.

She was also ordered to pay Sheila all profits made during that period from the Nasi Dagang Ulik Mayang restaurant.

On Jan 21, 2006, Sheila had sued Azlina for breaching an oral agreement pertaining to the Restoran Nasi Dagang House, which served cuisine from the east coast.

In her statement of claim, Sheila said that in April 2005, she and Azlina agreed to open the restaurant business together.

According to the oral agreement, Sheila claimed that she was required to promote the restaurant business through television programmes and among artistes while Azlina was responsible for the recipe and main dishes to be served at the restaurant.

Restoran Nasi Dagang House, which opened on July 11, 2005, was in business for less than two months. Sheila is claiming her investment of RM55,000 and profits from Sept 1-Sept 30, 2005, loss of future income, general damages and other damages deemed fit by the court.

Azlina, in her statement of defence, claimed that the restaurant business failed because of Sheila’s failure to tend to the business when it was her turn to do so.

======
huh selesai suda
lenkali nak wat bisness dgn kawan2 ni takleh janji mulut aje
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 2-4-2011 10:35 AM | Show all posts
Dgn adik beradik pun tak leh wat bisness ~
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 10:39 AM | Show all posts
Reply 2# DARSITA


   kalu pasal duit...laki bini leh cerai berai..mak ngan anak leh masam muker..adik badik leh carakan rimau sungguh..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 10:43 AM | Show all posts
oh adik dia ker?

lain kali buat Black & White agreement wlpn adik beradik pun
kita tak tau in future...(sbg langkah berhati2)
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 10:45 AM | Show all posts
makanan restoran dia sedap  ... dah 2 kali pergi makan kat sini
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 11:20 AM | Show all posts
silap pasal agreement mulut je... pengajaran utk semua org trmasuk kita2.....bukan masalah siapa betul siapa salah....kita cuma manusia, sentiasa berubah...kdg2 kita lupa apa yg kita sendiri pernah cakap.....
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
 Author| Post time 2-4-2011 11:34 AM | Show all posts
Sheila claimed that she was required to promote the restaurant business through television programmes and among artistes while Azlina was responsible for the recipe and main dishes to be served at the restaurant.

Azlina, in her statement of defence, claimed that the restaurant business failed because of Sheila’s failure to tend to the business when it was her turn to do so


tengok gaya, scope kerja lain2, dia manage the resto, sheila buat promo

Azlina ni pun, main tutup aje kedai tu, baru bukak bisnes dlm 2 bulan
takda diskas dgn bisnes partner, bukannya sheila pakai nama dia free2, dia pun ada letak duit gak dlm bisnes tu

yg paling kelakar boleh bukak pulak kedai baru kat2 situ gak
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 11:42 AM | Show all posts
memasing tak mau ngalah jadi mem besar.... :re: mau tak terlingkup bisnes... but luckily tempat ni survive jugekk...
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 2-4-2011 11:46 AM | Show all posts
adik dia ke
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 12:03 PM | Show all posts
not her sister la... i think just a common business partner gitu..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 12:05 PM | Show all posts
duit adalah segalanya kini ..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 12:07 PM | Show all posts
restoran ni masih ada ke?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 12:12 PM | Show all posts
Duit duit di mana ko duit. Sebab duit buang mak bapak, buang adik-beradik, buang sanak sedara. Gaduh sesame kengkawan. Padahal duit tu kertas je. Donia donia.......
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 12:32 PM | Show all posts
Dgn adik beradik pun tak leh wat bisness ~
DARSITA Post at 2-4-2011 10:35



    adik beradik tang mana kaka dar?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 12:34 PM | Show all posts


RESTORAN Nasi Dagang House di Taman Melati, Gombak yang menjadi pertikaian di antara Sheila dan Azlina.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 12:34 PM | Show all posts
Sheila Rusly menang kes saman

Oleh WAZIHA WAHID
dan MOHD. SYALMIZI HAMID
berita@kosmo.com.my

KUALA LUMPUR – Setelah lima tahun naik turun Mahkamah Tinggi di sini, pelakon dan produser Sheila Rusly lega apabila kes saman terhadap bekas rakan kongsinya, Datuk Azlina Che Abdullah akhirnya berpihak kepadanya.

Timbalan Pendaftar Mahkamah Tinggi, Hamidah Md. Deril dalam penghakimannya kelmarin membenarkan permohonan Sheila selaku plaintif supaya perjanjian perkongsian lisan berhubung restoran Nasi Dagang House dibatalkan.

Mahkamah juga memerintahkan Azlina yang dinamakan sebagai defendan mengemukakan kepada juruaudit segala rekod dan akaun perniagaan Nasi Dagang House (NDH) untuk tempoh 11 Julai 2005 hingga 30 September 2005.

Ia bertujuan menaksirkan untung rugi NDH dengan purata agihan untung 57 peratus kepada plaintif dan 43 peratus kepada defendan berasaskan purata modal yang dikeluarkan kedua-dua pihak iaitu RM55,000 oleh Sheila dan RM23,800 oleh Azlina.
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 2-4-2011 12:46 PM | Show all posts
emm bahaya ehh benda kongsi2 nih
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 12:49 PM | Show all posts
good for u sheila
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 03:02 PM | Show all posts
dorang kawan je klu tak salah
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-4-2011 03:52 PM | Show all posts
baru2 ni makan kat ulit mayang dah tak best nasi kerabu 5.00 kosong tapi manis .....eee dah tak mcam mula2 buka dulu...rasa tak lama dah tu nak melingkup ..
Reply

Use magic Report

12Next
Return to list New
You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT


Forum Hot Topic

 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

25-7-2024 08:48 PM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.093447 second(s), 46 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list