Mahkamah UK Arah Sarawak Report bayar £28,900 kepada Haji Hadi

dcruins

update terbaru, Haji Hadi ada advantage besar, teruk gak si Clare nyerrr pembelaan sampai kena reject 50 muka surat dari 55 page.......

----------------

https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2018/05/419508/peluang-hadi-menang-saman-sarawak-report-besar

Selasa, 1 Mei 2018 | 4:49pm

quote,

Peguam Abdul Hadi, Datuk Takiyuddin Hassan, berkata ia berdasarkan keputusan mahkamah itu semalam, yang menolak kira-kira 50 muka surat daripada 55 muka surat penyataan pembelaan editor penerbitan itu, Clare Rewcastle-Brown.

Sehubungan itu, beliau yakin 70 peratus saman fitnah terhadap penerbitan terbabit akan berpihak kepada Abdul Hadi.

"Kini hanya tinggal 30 peratus yang akan diputuskan di mahkamah apabila perbicaraan seterusnya dijadualkan pada April tahun depan.

" Peluang Tuan Guru Presiden PAS untuk menang saman ini, sekali gus membersihkan namanya sangat besar," katanya ketika sidang media khas di Masjid Rusila di sini, hari ini.

dcruins

Nampak nyerrr banyak laaa watak2 penipu besar dari Malaysia yg dibelakang Sarawak Report kena piii menghadap mahkamah kat UK nanti.....

dodolgemok

iloveselangor replied at 1-5-2018 08:37 AM
Kannnn....dia ingat lobai hangguk macam @dodolgemok fikir.

Alahai lobai2 semua kantoi xtau pasal perundangan. Kes belum bicara pon lagi tpi dah bersorak teloncat2 cam babi macam dah menang kes.

dodolgemok

roy3 replied at 1-5-2018 08:54 AM
Lorh...smpi 3 thread isu yg sama..lobai hepi sgt kt hape?

Hepi laa lobai ingat dh menang kes padahal kes x bicara pon lagi. Tgok fesbuk semua dah bertakbir kehulu kehilir mmg bangang mudah kena tipu mereka.

dodolgemok

kecimpret replied at 1-5-2018 08:55 AM
Aku tak terkejut lobai2 bodo akan spin kata pas menang saman

Dlm fesbuk lobai semua bertakbir kehulu kehilir declare dah menang. Mmg lobai ni bangang semuanya ke?

dcruins

camnerrr banyak sangat kena reject point2 pembelaan si Clare tuuu, dah biasa menulis benda2 penipu kot sampai mahkamah pun senang2 jerrr filter & buang point2 yg rubbish......

dcruins

meriah kat court nanti, muka2 kaki PHitnah dari Malaysia concert Live kat mahkamah UK.....

meisapoya

Semoga kebenaran menang. I berminat nk tahu mana yg betul mana yg salah.

iloveselangor

dodolgemok replied at 1-5-2018 07:55 PM
Alahai lobai2 semua kantoi xtau pasal perundangan. Kes belum bicara pon lagi tpi dah bersorak telo ...

Ko ni reply tak seiring dengan point dlm post i pon.

Nampak sangat kau ni bodoh tapi nak ajak sembang kan.

iloveselangor

Tahniah PAS!

Siiru Ala Barakatillah

wana89

Tunggu April 2019 walaupun dah dapat agak apa keputusannya. Jika pas menang, terjawab semua kisah 1MDB Dan fitnah 90jota. Nasib rakyat Malaysia tak habis-habis kena tipu.  Ada sampai buat rally.. Najib dan hadi mesti tengah senyum sinis sekarang ni  

wana89

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2017/04/28/hadis-brilliant-move-against-editor-of-sarawak-report/

By Azhar “Art” Harun

I read somewhere that Hadi Awang has commenced a defamation suit against Clare Rewcastle-Brown, the owner of Sarawak Report in the London High Court.

This is over her allegation that money from 1MDB ended up with Hadi.

In every defamation action, one of the defences available to the defendant is justification. That means it is now open to Clare to say that what she wrote was factually true.

If this defence is relied on by Clare, she would then have to explain to the High Court what 1MDB is all about. She would have to tell the court the whole story about where 1MDB got its money from, how it spent it, where the money went and how some of it ended up with Hadi.

This would entail showing to the court the money trail in respect of the money that allegedly ended up with Hadi; all the bank accounts statements and documents. Witnesses from the banks and 1MDB would have to be subpoenaed to testify. They would be ordered to bring in the requisite documents. They will be asked questions about the money.

If Clare’s counsel thinks that the witnesses are not co-operating, he would treat them as hostile witnesses. That means he can cross-examine them. That further means he can ask leading questions to them.

If the witnesses don’t appear in court, I am sure he would ask for some kind of order to compel them to do so.

I am sure he would also obtain a pre-trial order of discovery against Hadi and PAS. These are orders to compel Hadi and PAS to produce all banking documents within a certain period that are necessary to Clare’s defence and relevant to the trial.

Findings by the Public Accounts Committee and the Auditor-General may also be tendered to show what this is all about.

In addition, or the alternative, Clare could also say that she was merely making fair comments about a matter of public interest. This is what we, lawyers call the defence of fair comment and qualified privilege.

To succeed in this defence, Clare would have to show that she wasn’t motivated by any bad faith (mala fide) and that she was just commenting fairly on a matter of public interest.

She would of course have to refer to the Department of Justice (DoJ) proceedings and all the proceedings and/or investigations in Singapore, Switzerland and other countries and try to show that these are matters of public interest. To do this she might have to subpoenae officers from the DoJ and the authorities from all the other countries to testify.

This is a tall order for Clare.

It would be very, very difficult for her to win this case.

She will be ruined.

Hadi has done the right thing by suing her.

I very rarely agree with Hadi. But this is a brilliant move by Hadi.

Azhar “Art” Harun is a lawyer.

totokreturn

Aduhai... apa yg menang nyer... clare mohon percepatkan kes dan masukkan bukti audio nik abduh yg dah dihantar analisis di australia pada mahkamah london sebagai bahan bukti baru dan itu yg kena bayar.

Yg tetiba melompat pas dah menang tuh aper benda... patut laa sokong pas.. bawak cerita hadi mimpi basah pun walaun mati percaya...

espri6006

bioessence replied at 1-5-2018 11:40 AM
Siapa nak saman siapa

http://www.astroawani.com/berita ... sj-selasa-ini-64875

bioessence

espri6006 replied at 2-5-2018 06:47 AM
http://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/najib-akan-fail-saman-terhadap-wsj-selasa-ini-64875

1) Dikatakan
2) Sumber yang rapat
Kedua di atas rekaan astro.
Bukan pengumuman dari PM office.

wana89

espri6006 replied at 2-5-2018 06:47 AM
http://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/najib-akan-fail-saman-terhadap-wsj-selasa-ini-64875

Jangan risau
Tunggu saman hadi ni..  1MDB pun akan tahu. Xpayah najib saman pun  ..yang ni bukan cerita hanya pasal duit 90juta tapi keseluruhan.. Xlama mana pun, April tahun depan

dcruins

Banyak benda melalut jerrr dalam statement defense si Clair tuuuu, konon2 buat tebal2 boleh impress judge....

--------------------------------

http://www.malaysia-today.net/2018/05/01/sarawak-report-fails-to-prove-najib-stole-1mdbs-money/

quote,

Sections 25 and 26 in pages 13 to 53 are irrelevant and are not related to the RM90 million bribe allegation. It is not evidence to prove the allegation. So why have those 40 pages been inserted into the statement of defence and counter-claim?

It is an attempt by Sarawak Report to make their document thick in the hope of impressing the judge that they have a case. But the judge was not impressed.

Sarawak Report was hoping to ride on the ‘Defence of Truth’ argument but that has now been struck out with cost to Hadi once Section 26 was struck out. Section 26 basically deals with the allegations of the ‘misdeeds’ of PAS leaders.

Section 25 deals with Najib’s alleged misdeeds concerning 1MDB and many more and that, too, has been struck out. Sarawak Report was not able to prove that Najib committed any misdeeds concerning 1MDB and so on.

dodolgemok

iloveselangor replied at 1-5-2018 11:23 PM
Ko ni reply tak seiring dengan point dlm post i pon.

Nampak sangat kau ni bodoh tapi nak ajak s ...

Xpe Yahudi boleh bersorak dulu nnti menangis kemudian hsri bila kantoi lobai hadi bawang terima duit umngok. Amen.

wana89

Apa2 pun sesiapa menang dan kalah memang boleh diterima sebab dibicarakan di mahkamah berkecuali. Betul la idea hadi saman difilekan di London bukan di Malaysia . Jadi,  tak ada Isu sogok hakim cemolot ke apa.. Lawyer mahal suka hati lerr.. semua pihak berhak dapat pembelaan kalo dianiayakan dan semua pihak juga berhak untuk membela diri

dcruins

camnerrr laaa strategi pihak si British rejects tuuuu bila semua point2 penting pembelaan dia kena buang kat tong sampah oleh mahkamah negara dia sendiri, kantoi nak menipu jerrrrr, nak konar piii Najib kena reject bulat2 pulak.... , tulis tebal2 pembelaan yg konar sini sana, judge tak impress dengan konar2 dia....