CARI Infonet

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

View: 2630|Reply: 5

[Dunia] Kes student Malaysia (( LONDON RIOT)) Conviction quashed

[Copy link]
Post time 30-11-2012 01:26 PM | Show all posts |Read mode

Kalau dah ade momod delete yor.

Source bbc.uk.co



More on  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ ... CO=most_read_module. Byk brits yg tak puas hati dgn judge psl aquitted the two white trash.



Ashraf Rossli, now 21, was attacked on 8 August 2011 in Barking, east London.

Footage of him being helped up before being robbed was recorded on a mobile phone and posted on YouTube.

John Kafunda, 23, of Ilford, and Reece Donovan, 25, of Romford, had robbery and violent disorder convictions quashed at the Court of Appeal.

The hearing was held in private at the Court of Appeal but Lord Judge, Mr Justice Fulford and Mr Justice Bean announced their decision in open court.

The judges said they would give the reasons for their decisions at a later date.

Millions of people watched online the CCTV footage of Mr Rossli being robbed by men purporting to be Good Samaritans.

'Witness anonymity'

The accountancy student, who had been in the UK for a month, had his jaw shattered by a rioter moments earlier as he cycled in Barking.

Mr Kafunda and Mr Donovan were accused of robbing him as he walked in a dazed state over the Queen's Road flyover.

Ashraf Rossli had arrived in the UK a month before he was attacked

They insisted it was not them in the video but were convicted on the back of anonymous witness evidence.

During the original trial, Mr Kafunda told police he was "a million per cent sure" he was not the man seen in a CCTV film talking to Mr Rossli while his alleged accomplice rifled through his rucksack.

In March, Mr Kafunda had been jailed for four years and three months and Mr Donovan had received a five-year sentence.

The Crown Prosecution Service said it would not be seeking a retrial.

A spokesman said: "Victims and witnesses are at the heart of the criminal justice system and it is important that they have the support necessary to enable them to give their best evidence at court.

"Where it is necessary to protect the identification of a witness we can in certain circumstances apply to the court for witness anonymity.

"Our application for witness anonymity for two witnesses in this trial was allowed by the judge. Without anonymity being given these witnesses would not have given evidence.

"The Court of Appeal has quashed these convictions as a result of allowing this application."


Last edited by stokin on 30-11-2012 01:31 PM

Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 30-11-2012 05:17 PM | Show all posts
alkisahnye, takde sape yang heran pon pasal kes Ashraf Rossli ni ke?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 30-11-2012 05:21 PM | Show all posts
undang2 manusia yg penuh kelemahan...u can cheat law...it's not what u see, is what u can prove - Training Day
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 30-11-2012 05:28 PM | Show all posts
ada video cctv pun bole lepas gak. pelik2. mesti pendakwa raya ngan penyiasat malas wat keja ni.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 30-11-2012 05:35 PM | Show all posts
sebenarnya banyak kes2 penjenayah terlepas sebab hal2 teknikal dalam court bukan di UK je di m'sia pon sama contoh kes liwat anwart tu (kes 1 dan 2), kes rogol bawah umur dsbgnya .....lobai bodo yg tak dak kena mengena dalam court buleh cakap mahkamah dah dibeli umngok la apa la....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 30-11-2012 11:57 PM | Show all posts
syok baca komen pembaca kat sini.....scroll sampai bawah skip the main article
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ ... CO=most_read_module
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

17-5-2024 04:40 AM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.195639 second(s), 35 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list