What Soora 2:23 really says to SFE Talk?

sonny~~

Originally posted by sonny~~ at 2004-3-2 05:35 PM:
why u say sura 2:23 is not intelligible?  intelligent response now.  no brayin no hecklin no spammin.  we start from scratch  :bg:

peace

sonny~~

top  ;)

sonny~~

Originally posted by sonny~~ at 2004-3-7 10:42 AM:
top  ;)

ariyamusafir

Look, whatever it is, peace with all religion.

[ Last edited by ariyamusafir on 12-3-2004 at 05:07 PM ]

Fuzzman

Debmey still can't decide as to what literature would be used to take on the 2:23. Now why is that such a difficult thing to do? Debmey flunked the acid test for the objective criteria created only by Debmey, yardsticked upon   Debmey's own individual delusional standards or watermarks, with values applicable to Debmey's own twisted valuation standards that runs renagade to the norms.

Buck up SFE Talk aka Debbo. True to the criteria of the 2:23, you shouldn't shun away assistance from a volunteer Christian in the form of Sonny~~  who has been outstandingly trying to lead you in the right path of self-discovery and pre-salvation. Embrace his genuine deed, not kill it.

ARI FUZZMAN

Debmey

Fuzzman still can't make sura 2:23 intelligible.
So where Fuzzy, where are teh objective criteria for the judges and who will be the judges?

Fuzzman

Originally posted by Debmey at 2004-3-17 10:08 AM:
Fuzzman still can't make sura 2:23 intelligible.
So where Fuzzy, where are teh objective criteria for the judges and who will be the judges?

Just too bad for poor Debbo. You can't take on my perception for the OC. You can't tell me the literature you'd be using to address the 2:23. And now you ask of judges? First of all is there any mention of judges in 2:23?  Sit on it and give me an answer..if you can?

Here's another poser [question] for you [while we're still at it]. What is the language that will be used by you for the 2:23 rundown?

ARI FUZZMAN

Debmey

You gotta give us the objective criteria first.
So where? Where are the objective criteria for the challenge?

Looks like Fuzzman is shying away friom making the Quran intelligible.

cheers

Fuzzman

Firstly can you prove that 2:23 mentions anything about judges? Secondly, God hates lazy people other than those who lie in his name. You want my perception of the OC for the 2:23? Go back like six to eleven pages and it's plastered all over the thread. Looks like Debbo's shying away from proving that he's able to take on the 2:23.

solve the following important questions below :-

1. What is the literature you'd be using for the 2:23 rundown?
2. What is the language you'd be using for the comparison?

ARI FUZZMAN

Debmey

For all that to happen, you gotta give us the objective criteria first.
So where? Where are the objective criteria for the challenge?

Looks like Fuzzman is shying away friom making the Quran intelligible.

cheers

sonny~~

Originally posted by Debmey at 2004-3-17 12:41 PM:
For all that to happen, you gotta give us the objective criteria first.
So where? Where are the objective criteria for the challenge?

Looks like Fuzzman is shying away friom making the Quran i ...

quit spammin old chap.

ur question is wheres the objective criteria for the challenge right?

n FUZZ has clearly stated the objective criteria is as such " To create a chapter in likeness to any chosen soora with the assistance of your helpers from your faith who are directly your witnesses if and when you are in doubt that the Quran was not from Allah but the creation of Prophet Mohammad."  right?

so wots ur problem with the hysterical spammin on objective criteria?  

if u dont wanna accept FUZZs objective criteria, why then r u fretful of comin up with ur own objective criteria?  stay cool  

peace

sonny~~

Debmey

Yes my muslim frens? Where are the objective criteria for the cahllenge and who gets to be judge? Adfter 16 pages, yu muslism still cabnnot make sense of Quran?

sonny~~

up up n away  ;)

ariyamusafir

Originally posted by Debmey at 24-3-2004 18:10:
Yes my muslim frens? Where are the objective criteria for the cahllenge and who gets to be judge? Adfter 16 pages, yu muslism still cabnnot make sense of Quran?

Hahahaha!!! I think I can be judge to this. I champion fairness!!!!! Hahahaha, I can be judge all right!!!!! Justice General Tan hahahahahaha

Fuzzman

Sonny~~ wrote:  if u dont wanna accept FUZZs objective criteria, why then r u fretful of comin up with ur own objective criteria?

TRUE WORDS OF WISDOM COMING FROM A CHRISTIAN

ARI FUZZMAN

sonny~~

Fuzzman

Yup Debmey can be the President of Singapore for all Fuzzman cares but he still can't put down my perception for the objective criteria of the 2:23! And that my patient readers and followers of this thread is A GOD-GIVEN FACT!

ARI FUZZMAN

Debmey

and i still haven't got any objective criteria for the sura challenge fromFuzzman, not a single one. The verse remains unintelligible and the world don't care.

Fuzzman

See, now you know why you can't get to be in Goh Chong Tok's shoes? Anyway be humble enough for a Moderator post that you can't make stand most the times.

You still can't size up to my perception of the OC for the 2:23! That in itself is a defeat for you albeit. Oh, you're wrong, the world does care! That is why most of your Christian buddies have left you out high and dry with no support from them for you in this thread - let alone the assistance from the good-natured Unitarian himself - to whom you've chosen to ignore. Remember the 2:23 says that you should all the possible help from the likes of your faith in assistance for the 2:23 invitation. Cheers buddyboy.

ARI FUZZMAN