|
Do Chinese people know morality and ethics?
[Copy link]
|
|
wkk5159 posted on 21-11-2014 10:09 AM
Does high sex crime and rape cases in India make all Indian a race with no moral and ehtics ???
...
besides taking unclean meat that goes to the body of humans which the purity is lost.....taking strong drinks such acholo too can effect the body and mind...in india 90% takes such bad drinks....hence they behave like animals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Truth.8 posted on 21-11-2014 10:42 AM
besides taking unclean meat that goes to the body of humans which the purity is lost.....taking ...
No, Hindu Indian don't take pork just like you too, Fallacy.8, are you a serial sex offender too Fallacy.8 ???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wkk5159 posted on 21-11-2014 11:06 AM
No, Hindu Indian don't take pork just like you too, Fallacy.8, are you a serial sex offender too F ...
now you just behaving typcial china men type...how that can come? the pork lover things...shame on you...calling urself as christians yet your words is bad...
i have already explained in details the eating pork and how it effect humans characteristics .....in malaysia mostly doing bad characteristics are chinese, of course there good chinese which I know mosty from Buddhist are totally vegetarian..... the pork lovers peoples nothing but : alvin and her girl friend expoing nude in fb, running nude in beach, taking photo nude in street for wedding , wearing sexy outfits in public places....are this pork lover peopels...that is fact...is not about races but about the dirty things u put in your mouth...hence you behave such
characteristics of pigs are dirty hence you are same....
that why the unclean spirit ask Jesus to send to swine because both are dirty...
Last edited by Truth.8 on 21-11-2014 01:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Truth.8 posted on 21-11-2014 01:25 PM
now you just behaving typcial china men type...how that can come? the pork lover things...shame on ...
Pork lovers , read this:
Is Pork Healthy? Shane Tyler Milson
May 18, 2014
Healthy Living
If you’re eating pork on the regular, this article may sting a little…
Dr. Ted Broer, Dr. Axe and Dr. Jeff McCombs are among the many doctors that have evidence to prove that pork consumption is one of the major causes of many degenerative disease and illness.
They are not alone in their opinions…
Both well known and trusted natural health authorities and consumer advocates, Dr. Joesph Mercola and author of the best selling health book of all time Natural Cures “they” don’t want you to know about, Kevin Trudeau know the dangers of pork and believe that avoiding pork is vital to maintaining good health.
Even major religions concur.
Muslims and Jews, for example are forbidden to eat pork in any form. Leviticus 11:7 from the bible labels the pig an “unclean” animal, and prohibits the consumption of pork.
So maybe there’s something to this….
As a pork lover most of my life, coming across what you’re about to read was hard for me but in all honesty, the negative consequences of eating pork outweigh any health benefits.
Dr. McCombs, the world’s foremost expert on Candida, found from his first hand experience in treating thousands of patients, that when he took them completely off pork, they always felt much better and had more energy.
Most of their health symptoms, regardless of what they suffered from, also become alleviated. He said this was the case with virtually 100% of his patients!
This might be painful to read, especially if you enjoy pork, but it’s important to know, as it just may be the key to solving many of your health problems.
The Major Risks of Eating PorkThe greatest risk of eating pork is a retrovirus (porcine endogenas) that lives within the cells of all pork.
What little is known about this retrovirus is that it can survive extremely high cooking temperatures for long periods of time and mimics the symptoms of AIDS. This retrovirus is similar to AIDS in the essence that it uses the bodies cells to replicate itself, meaning the virus can go undetected for many, many years as it infiltrates and spreads throughout the body.
Now keep in mind that when you cook meat for long periods of time, as what’s done to pork products, it results in the creation of over 20 different kinds of heterocyclic amines, or HCAs for short.
All of which are linked to cancer.
The Symptoms of Retrovirus Infection are:- Hormonal Imbalances
- Low Energy Levels
- Joint/Back Pain
- Inflammation
- Excessive Histamine Production
- Headaches
- More frequent Colds and Flu’s
Not appearing so appetizing all of the sudden..
So, to recap; you can’t kill the retrovirus by cooking it at high temperatures for long periods of time and even if you managed to subdue the virus you’re still exposing yourself to cancer causing substances.
Sounds like gambling with your health.
Overexposure to the retrovirus from pork consumption can accumulate in your body leading to arthritis, heart disease and cancer.
Pigs Do Some Nasty ______.Pigs harbour many toxins that are latent with diseases and worms, because pigs scavenge as pigs do.
They will eat anything in their path including insects, worms, feces, garbage and even other dead pig carcasses if they come into contact with them.
Keep in mind that whatever a pig eats turns to meat on their bones within just a few hours!
Remember the old saying, that goes something like “You are what you eat“?
Eating pork is virtually the same as eating undigested garbage filled with viruses. Most flu viruses that we come into contact with actually are created from the lungs of pigs. The pig’s lungs are an incubator for the combination of bird, human and porcine viruses.
You’re Sicker Than You Think…Now some people may think “I have been eating pork for years and I’m okay.”
Well here’s the unfortunate truth… You aren’t okay and you probably don’t even realize how much pork is negatively affecting you because you’re so used to feeling at a constant low vibration.
If you’ve been eating pork for some time now, it’s likely that the infection of the retrovirus has already taken hold of you and ingrained itself in your cells, which is zapping you of energy, mental clarity and good health.
You may think you’re fine eating this “dirty meat” but you are severly damaging your health, as shown by research and the worlds foremost leading authorities on health.
You may not have gotten violently or noticeably sick but you’re sacrificing the quality of health you could have by not eating pork products.
Indicators that eating pork is affecting your health are: Truth Hurts.
- Constant fatigue
- Low energy levels
- High susceptibility to colds and flu’s
- Feeling bloated after eating
- Frequent depression
It’s becoming more and more common to hear of people becoming seriously sick and poisoned from consuming pork products that aren’t cooked or prepared properly.
What people do not realize is that cooking the meat cannot kill the virus and all pork products including ham, bacon, smoked meats, sausages and cured deli meats are harbouring the retrovirus.
Every time you eat pork you’re gambling with your health and sooner or later the house always wins.
Pork has always been and continues to be a very risky health choice.
What You’ll Notice When You Stop Eating PorkAs reported by Dr. McCombs and Kevin Trudeau, when people eliminate pork from their diet for 30 days, virtually 100% of people notice feeling lighter, more alive and experience an overall sense of balance and well being!
Sounds good so far right?
I challenge you to take 30 days off from eating pork and observe how you feel. If you really want to be convinced, then try eating your favourite pork meal, weather it’s bacon, sausage or pork loin roast after the 30 day challenge and see notice how you feel.
At the least, if you reduce pork consumption you will still notice some benefits but it’s the elimination of pork that will show you the real difference in quality of health.
Now I don’t recommend being fanatical and refusing to ever eat pork again as if it’ll kill you on the spot, but I do recommend cooling it down on your consumption and going organic at the very least.
Is Organic Pork Healthy?If you choose to eat pork, make sure it is naturally and humanely raised from a pastured source. This kind of humane pork is fed organic vegetable and grains. Any other source of pork is inhumane (in crates they can’t even turn around in their entire lives) and much, much more likely to be harbouring diseases.
But remember that there’s no immunity from the retrovirus no matter where the pig has come from, because the retrovirus is always there and you cannot stop pigs from from doing things like eating their own feces, which also contaminates the meat with further toxins.
Avoiding pork often, even organic pasture-raised versions, in favor of healthier and safer meat sources, like organic grass-fed beef, lamb, bison and chicken is my recommendation, but remember, don’t become a goddamn fanatic!
Just take precautions and use avoidance whenever possible.
Until Next Time…
Last edited by Truth.8 on 22-11-2014 07:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by wkk5159
Does high sex crime and rape cases in India make all Indian a race with no moral and ehtics ???
Good question. Answer is No. DO YOU KNOW WHY?
Cos there is no high sex crime and rape among Indian society here in Malaysia, Singapore OR anywhere else where Indians have settled down. ONLY in India. Look at the website below, India is the 3RD in most people with HIV and AIDS in the World, second only to South Africa and Nigeria. (BTW - Malaysia is 41 and Indonesia is 19).
Source : http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=35&t=100
This is because India have been ruled for 60 years by seculars and atheists who have no regards toward Indian belief and tradition.
But can you say Chinese who are living in Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan, China, HK and western societies are different? NO, they are still money-minded no matter where they go, which bring back to my conclusion that Chinese have no morale or ethics (ONLY value of wealth). This may look like a rascist comment but it is fact.
Take a look at the recent Cameron Highland incident where a large number of illegals have been found living there, causing problems like invading lands which not belongs to them. Who are the ones at fault here? The Illegal immigrants who were brought in and employed by Chinese farmers? NO, they do not know the laws of the land and therefore, should be treated properly and send home.
Instead, it is the local employers who should have know the laws and how to respect them which should be caught, prosecuted as hard as possible and thrown into jail. Also, Malaysia society can also "punish" them by not buying any products sold from Cameron Highland, because by buying these product, you are encouraging such actions from being repeated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Truth.8 posted on 22-11-2014 12:15 PM
Pork lovers , read this:
The recent news about how a DAPigs Tony pua who makes slander against our PM. You must remember that anyone who eat unclean meats such pork which consider dirty...are not to be trusted 100%...you are what you eat...remember how satan the devil ask Jesus to cast into swine...because unclean spirits prefer filthy animals ...it choose pigs....
anyone consume pork or alcohol...never I repeat never take their words 100% ...this my advise to all...because from purity of the souls they have polluted with dirt ...that is the pork lovers ....we hve one forummer here by the name wkk5159....how he slander me being serial sex offender and etc....i m sure he is from DAPigs....I would advise PAS to refrain from joning DAPig...they consider dangerous party..
Pork Lovers, here another write up:
Is Pork Still Dangerous?
Did Leviticus get it right? Pork may still be dangerous.
Published on February 8, 2012 byPaul & Shou-Ching Jaminet in Perfect Health Diet
0
[url=]inShare[/url]
Experts
Paul & Shou-Ching Jaminet
Paul Jaminet, Ph.D., was an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, became a software entrepreneur during the Internet boom, and now provides strategic advice to entrepreneurial companies while pursuing research in economics (see pauljaminet.com for more information). Paul was educated at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of California at Berkeley. Paul's experience overcoming a chronic infectious disease through diet, nutrition, and antibiotics was the key to developing the Perfect Health Diet.
Shou-Ching Jaminet, Ph.D., is a vascular biologist and cancer researcher at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, and Director of BIDMC's Multi-Gene Transcriptional Profiling Core. Shou-Ching was born in Korea to Chinese parents and grew up in Korea. She attended college at National Taiwan University in Taipei and graduate school at University of Newcastle in Australia before coming to the US to work at Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Children's Hospital Boston, and Beth Israel Deaconess and Harvard Medical School. Shou-Ching's research focuses on finding anti-angiogenic therapies for cancer.
If we were to rank popular meats by their healthfulness, the order would be (1) fish and shellfish, (2) ruminants (beef, lamb, goat), and (3) birds (duck, chicken, turkey). In last place would be pork.
Of course, the ancient Hebrews were forbidden to eat pork, and it's commonly assumed that health concerns were behind the prohibition. Commenter George Henderson prompted us to look into the modern case for avoiding pork with this comment: "Nanji and Bridges identified possible problems with pork plus moderate alcohol in 1985 and other researchers have confirmed the pattern since."
Pork Consumption and Liver Cirrhosis Pork consumption has a strong epidemiological association with cirrhosis of the liver. Startlingly, pork may be even more strongly associated with alcoholic cirrhosis than alcohol itself!
The evidence was summarized by Francis Bridges in a recent (2009) paper [1], building on earlier work by Nanji and French [2]. A relation between pork consumption and cirrhosis of the liver is apparent across countries and has been consistently maintained for at least 40 years.
Here is the correlation between pork consumption and mortality from liver cirrhosis in 2003 [1]:
The correlation coefficient of 0.83 is extremely high - rarely seen in epidemiology. Correlation coefficients range from -1.0 to 1.0, and a coefficient of 1.0 would indicate that cirrhosis mortality was strictly proportional to pork consumption. The very low p-value confirms the statistical association.
Here is the relation between alcohol consumption and mortality from liver cirrhosis:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2760419/bin/ijerph-06-02417f1.jpg
The correlation coefficient is lower than for pork consumption.
In epidemiological studies, beef, lamb, and pork are often grouped together as "red meat." However, this may conceal differences between pork and the ruminant meats. Bridges found that beef actually appeared protective against cirrhosis:
In the present study using 2003 data, a significant negative association between dietary beef and rates of cirrhosis mortality was found.... [D]ietary beef may be a protective factor regarding the pathogenesis of alcoholic cirrhosis. [1]
This would be consistent with considerable evidence, discussed in our book (pp 57-58), showing that saturated fat is protective against liver disease, while polyunsaturated fat causes it. Epidemiological data confirms that saturated fat is protective; here is Bridges again [1]:
[A]nalysis of data from 17 countries indicated that diets high in cholesterol and saturated fat protected (i.e., inversely correlated) against alcoholic cirrhosis while polyunsaturated fats promoted (positively correlated) cirrhosis [8].
Beef is high in saturated fat, low in polyunsaturated fat. Pork is relatively high in polyunsaturated fat.
If the fat composition is playing a role, perhaps it is not that surprising that pork is more strongly related to cirrhosis than alcohol.
Either fructose or alcohol can react with polyunsaturated fat to produce liver disease. Sugar consumption, for example in soft drinks, may be just as likely to combine with pork to cause a cirrhotic liver as alcohol. But no other common dietary component can substitute for the role of polyunsaturated fat in causing liver disease.
Here is Nanji and French summarizing the correlation of pork with liver disease even in the absence of alcohol:
In countries with low alcohol consumption, no correlation was obtained between alcohol consumption and cirrhosis. However, a significant correlation was obtained between cirrhosis and pork. A similar relationship was seen in the ten Canadian provinces, where there was no correlation between cirrhosis mortality and alcohol consumption, but a significant correlation was obtained with pork. [2]
But fat composition is hardly likely to be the sole issue with pork. Most polyunsaturated fats in modern diets are derived from vegetable oils, not pork. It seems that there must be something else in pork besides polyunsaturated fat that is causing liver disease.
Pork and Liver Cancer We would expect that if pork can cause liver cirrhosis it will also promote liver cancer, since injured and inflamed tissues are more likely to become cancerous.
Indeed, there is an association between pork consumption and the primary liver cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanji and French [3] write:
The authors investigated the possibility that dietary fat, meat, beef, and pork consumption might be factors that would, in addition to alcohol, correlate with mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in different countries....
The correlation between HCC and alcohol was 0.40 (p < 0.05); that with pork consumption was also 0.40 (p < 0.05). There was no correlation with total fat meat, beef, and cigarette and tobacco consumption.
The correlation with pork consumption is as strong as that for alcohol. Beef has no relation at all liver cancer.
Another way of looking at the data is based on countries with low and high incidence of HCC. In countries with a high incidence of HCC (more than 3 per 100,000), compared to countries with a low incidence, alcohol consumption was higher by 128%, and pork consumption was higher by 68%. [3]
However, pork was not a marker for animal food or fat consumption. Fat consumption was actually inversely associated with HCC: high incidence countries ate 12% less fat than low incidence countries. [3]
Pork and Multiple Sclerosis Nanji and Norad [4] looked for other diseases that correlate with pork consumption, and hit upon multiple sclerosis. The connection is remarkable:
A significant correlation was obtained between prevalence of multiple sclerosis and ... pork consumption (r = 0.87, p less than 0.001). There was no significant correlation with beef consumption. [4]
As noted earlier, a correlation coefficient of 0.87 is extremely high, and a p-value below 0.001 also shows a very strong relationship. MS is much more likely to befall pork eaters. Such a strong correlation makes it look like pork, or something found in pork, is the cause of MS.
Nanji and Norad further note that beef, the "other red meat," is not associated with MS:
The correlation between pork consumption and MS prevalence was highly significant. Also, of major significance was the absence of a significant correlation between MS prevalence and beef consumption. This is consistent with the observations that MS is rare in countries where pork is forbidden by religious customs (e.g. Middle East) and has a low prevalence in countries where beef consumption far exceeds pork consumption (e.g. Brazil, Australia). [4]
Lauer [5] verified the pork-MS link, but found it to be characteristic of processed pork:
When ... quantitative data are taken into account, and a combined factor "smoked meat" or "smoked pork" is formed, the association is very high throughout. This factor is also compatible with the high risk of multiple sclerosis in Scotland and particularly in the Orkney and Shetland Islands and with the only transitorily high incidence in the Faroe Islands [6], whereas coffee can hardly explain both epidemiological features.
Arguments for the biological plausibility of some agents occurring in smoked and cured meat (in particular nitrophenol haptens and their protein conjugates) have been put forward [7]. There appears at present to be no plausibility for the factor "margarine", which was also not compatible with the temporal pattern of multiple sclerosis in the Faroe Islands. [6]
Conclusion There are remarkably strong correlations between pork consumption and liver disease, liver cancer, and multiple sclerosis.
What can be behind those relationships? The relatively high omega-6 fat content of pork may be a contributing factor, but it can't be the whole story. It seems there is something else in pork that makes pork consumption risky.
What is it about pork that is so dangerous, and what does it mean for our dietary advice? That will be the topic of our next post.
References [1] Bridges FS. Relationship between dietary beef, fat, and pork and alcoholic cirrhosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Sep;6(9):2417-25. http://pmid.us/19826553.
[2] Nanji AA, French SW. Relationship between pork consumption and cirrhosis. Lancet. 1985 Mar 23;1(8430):681-3. http://pmid.us/2858627.
[3] Nanji AA, French SW. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Relationship to wine and pork consumption. Cancer. 1985 Dec 1;56(11):2711-2. http://pmid.us/2996744.
[4] Nanji AA, Narod S. Multiple sclerosis, latitude and dietary fat: is pork the missing link? Med Hypotheses. 1986 Jul;20(3):279-82. http://pmid.us/3638477.
[5] Lauer K. The food pattern in geographical relation to the risk of multiple sclerosis in the Mediterranean and Near East region. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Sep;45(3):251-2. http://pmid.us/1757770.
[6] Lauer K. Dietary changes in relation to multiple sclerosis in the Faroe Islands: an evaluation of literary sources. Neuroepidemiology. 1989;8(4):200-6. http://pmid.us/2755551.
[7] Lauer K. Environmental nitrophenols and autoimmunity. Mol Immunol. 1990 Jul;27(7):697-8. http://pmid.us/2395440.
[8] Nanji AA, French SW. Dietary factors and alcoholic cirrhosis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1986 Jun;10(3):271-3. http://pmid.us/3526949.
Last edited by Truth.8 on 25-11-2014 05:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Truth.8 posted on 25-11-2014 03:41 PM
The recent news about how a DAPigs Tony pua who makes slander against our PM. You must remember t ...
if you look at the society who take pork...are cunning in business and dishonest plus greed to become rich...and slander is part of their lives ,,,,,this are the pork lover peoples...why? pigs are dirty creatures..
PIG & PORK FACTS THE pig or swine is a very popular food item with most Christians. Yet Christians are unaware that the God they profess to believe in had condemned the eating of swine's flesh. The condemnation was based on some very sound biological principles. Here are some facts on pork that prove it to be a very unhealthy food to eat:
A pig is a real garbage gut. It will eat anything including urine, excrement, dirt, decaying animal flesh, maggots, or decaying vegetables. They will even eat the cancerous growths off other pigs or animals.
The meat and fat of a pig absorbs toxins like a sponge. Their meat can be 30 times more toxic than beef or venison.
When eating beef or venison, it takes 8 to 9 hours to digest the meat so what little toxins are in the meat are slowly put into our system and can be filtered by the liver. But when pork is eaten, it takes only 4 hours to digest the meat. We thus get a much higher level of toxins within a shorter time.
Unlike other mammals, a pig does not sweat or perspire. Perspiration is a means by which toxins are removed from the body. Since a pig does not sweat, the toxins remain within its body and in the meat.
Pigs and swine are so poisonous that you can hardly kill them with strychnine or other poisons.
Farmers will often pen up pigs within a rattlesnake nest because the pigs will eat the snakes, and if bitten they will not be harmed by the venom.
When a pig is butchered, worms and insects take to its flesh sooner and faster than to other animal's flesh. In a few days the swine flesh is full of worms.
Swine and pigs have over a dozen parasites within them, such as tapeworms, flukes, worms, and trichinae. There is no safe temperature at which pork can be cooked to ensure that all these parasites, their cysts,and eggs will be killed.
Pig meat has twice as much fat as beef. A 3 oz T bone steak contains 8.5 grams of fat; a 3 oz pork chop contains 18 grams of fat. A 3 oz beef rib has 11.1 grams of fat; a 3 oz pork spare rib has 23.2 grams of fat.
Cows have a complex digestive system, having four stomachs. It thus takes over 24 hours to digest their vegetarian diet causing its food to be purified of toxins. In contrast, the swine's one stomach takes only about 4 hours to digest its foul diet, turning its toxic food into flesh.
The swine carries about 30 diseases which can be easily passed to humans. This is why God commanded that we are not even to touch their carcase (Leviticus 11:8).
The trichinae worm of the swine is microscopically small, and once ingested can lodge itself in our intestines, muscles, spinal cord or the brain. This results in the disease trichinosis. The symptoms are sometimes lacking, but when present they are mistaken for other diseases, such as typhoid, arthritis, rheumatism, gastritis, MS, meningitis, gall bladder trouble, or acute alcoholism.
The pig is so poisonous and filthy, that nature had to prepare him a sewer line or canal running down each leg with an outlet in the bottom of the foot. Out of this hole oozes pus and filth his body cannot pass into its system fast enough. Some of this pus gets into the meat of the pig.
There are other reasons grounded in biological facts that could be listed to show why pigs and swine should not be eaten. But a true Christian should only need one reason why not to eat this type of food because God prohibited it.
"And the swine, because it divides the hoof, yet does not chew the cud, it is unclean unto you: you shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcase." - Leviticus 11:7,8; Deuteronomy 14:8
Those who say Christ abolished the law condemning pork are motivated by their stomach not Scripture. The problems with pork are biological, and Christ never changed the laws of biology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Sephiroth for highlighting these issues. I totally agree with you. Chinese people have become slave to money and status. Their purpose of life is just a material gain, willing to sacrifice their culture, ethics and morale to get what they want.
They treat their children like robot, emotions aside as long as their children finish their homework, excel in their studies and able to get a good job and earn a lot of money.
They also worshipped western civilization, everything from the west are good and change their names to sound more like "white people" and celebrate Christmas more that white people do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by gue
Their purpose of life is just a material gain, willing to sacrifice their culture, ethics and morale to get what they want.
Wanting materialistic wealth is not an evil thing. Greed is good, as long as they know the limits. There is a popular saying in Tamil - "You cannot take anything with you to your grave". As long as they (Chinese) understand that they should aim for materialistic wealth but at same time, knows when to stop for sake of Spiritualism, then they will be alright. But even this, they failed to understand.
Gautama Buddha (through his teaching) have taught them to pray for their dead and do good deeds to generate merits (which they can "donate"/derma) for their predecessors, what they do? They turn 360 degrees and created all kinds of paper dolls and nonsense which they burn every year. Where did they learn this? Which Buddha taught them to burn things for the dead? And every year around Hungry Ghost Month, there are an increasing number of accidents (and people like me who could see the dead are in danger).
They treat their children like robot, emotions aside as long as their children finish their homework, excel in their studies and able to get a good job and earn a lot of money.
I had recently went to eat with friends at Asia Cafe in Subang Jaya and read an interesting roadside sign (of a local college there) that says something about 70% of all working adults are unhappy with their jobs and a question was asked by parents what if they spend thousands on education which their children did not like, does that mean they had failed their children.
Oi tauke (stupid parents) - you failed your children the moment you decide what they want to study and become. You failed them cos you cared more about your money which you spend instead of the time and effect they going to spend. You failed them cos you put the pride of being father to a lawyer, engineer, doctor or some other hotshots in the society instead of taking pride of being father to your children. You failed them the moment you refused to listen to their interest instead of treating them as some bank share stocks. Your failure have nothing to do with educational system. It have everything to do with you turning your own children into cashcows and long term investment.
They also worshipped western civilization, everything from the west are good and change their names to sound more like "white people" and celebrate Christmas more that white people do.
It is called Slave Mentality. I have seen such things among the Philiphinos who takes Spanish names as they own, even so none of their family members had ever been to Spain. I have seen such things among Indians in India where they talk in English, eat like the English and live like English even so they are in India. And we have all seen it in Malays as well, who discard their forefathers' ways and become just another Arabic dog. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|