Embraer EMB145 ERIEYE vs BOEING 737 AEW&C AWACs

tangopapa · Post time 1-1-2009 11:45 PM

But why they choose GV? A bigger platform like Chilean Airforce 707 is the most suitable and the first platform used by israel to develop Phalcon. More cos effective to operate and has excellent endurance, and can remain on station for extended periods. . Even though the acft look ugly.

I read somewer, there's no statement saying that Sg involved in the project. And also it is understood that ur version are miniaturised version of the main Phalcon system. That could, "miniaturised" its capability too.

belacan79 · Post time 2-1-2009 12:18 AM

Chielean Phalcon is 1st generation Phalcon. Sg and Isreal Phalcon is 3rd generation Phalcon. It is far more powerful and more kapabel. The reder renge is around 400km. The kurent renge of SG E-2c is 370km.

http://www.defense-update.com/products/n/nachshon.htm

The redar is actuali abt the same size but only the platform is diferent. Sg and Isreal choose smaller platform becuz
         1) less redar cross-section
         2) Gulf-stream is smaler in size but has good endurance. Can fly further and higher altitude. Gulfstream 550 can fly to Tokyo non-stop.
         3) Kost eficient. And easy to maintein.
         4) Can take off from Sg roads.

SG and Isreal requested acess to Phalcon redar sistem not to long ago. I rem it is US congress doc. Phalcon is US origin. Us gave it to Isreal.

And now Sg has the tech too.

tangopapa · Post time 2-1-2009 12:32 AM

Roads again? if ur roads disable too, where would like u go?

Has the tech and own the tech is two diff thing lol...

belacan79 · Post time 2-1-2009 12:44 AM

Lots of roads ard. And everything can be repair

Has the tech and own the tech can mean same thing if permision is granted to change and improve it.

Tat why Isreal is now seling it.

tangopapa · Post time 2-1-2009 12:51 AM

yups it can be repair but for how long it can be repair?

U said it, If permissiion is granted, then u are not own the tech lor...

windof · Post time 2-1-2009 02:16 AM

apa daa mau pakai kapalterbang radar semua nih, buang minyak jer. baik pakai aerostat hantaq pi 60000-70000 kaki ka diam2 duduk kat atas sana....satu SEA moleh nampak, monitor n detect...

tangopapa · Post time 2-1-2009 09:18 AM

weehhh.... ade plak yang tersangkut kat aerostat tu nanti...

Good idea gak, pasang banyak2 kat border selatan... monitoring n fencing system

belacan79 · Post time 2-1-2009 10:09 AM

Very fast

Read up on Gulf war 1/2. Civilian airport take less than 20-30 mins for big holes. Militri is even faster.Tat is asuming the slow rockets are not shot down first or we see the lunchers first and then boom.

SG`s SAR abiliti is more >400 km wide on MPA, AWAC and UAV. Everything can be seen and tracked. If luncher open fires, almost certain lunchers will be hit by counter artilery when open fires.

Peopel ignore the larger isue that SG has abiliti to absord atacks and give knock-out punch. Sg entire infratrusture is built for tat. And all her equipmen are under fortified struktur and has alternative routes. But of course, this is asuming Sg dont land the first blow. In realiti, SG abiliti to land first blow is unmatch in region.

Iregardless if u own tech or not, is not isue. Isue is abiliti to modify it.

[ Last edited by belacan79 at 2-1-2009 10:14 AM ]

tangopapa · Post time 2-1-2009 10:54 AM

saying is more easier then reality. gulf war is not take place in Sg maa... the reality is, u still dunno wat to do when the event took place. Ur networking system will be separated and "saving private ryan" drama is ongoing

U know dat, but still want to exaggerate n assume ehh....