|
|
Preservation and Authenticity of the Holy Quran
[Copy link]
|
|
|
|
Ahahahahaha.................. its so easy to disprove the quran. Muslims obvious have no defence for this thing.The evidence just stacks aginst the Quran. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Al-qur'an was preserved by itself...why...?u read the qur'an,u'll know the answer..  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debmey,
maybe your problem is,u only do the research but never read the qur'an...same like u telling people that Durian is not good but u never ate it before....sound logic rite....i believe u r like that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the pie is in the eating. The Sanaa manuscript differs markly from the quran script of today.
that directly contradicts the claim that the quran was preserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by sedondon at 27-3-2007 09:16 AM
aku dari dulu asyik tertanya2 apakah yg dimaksudkan merepak? aku ingatkan typing error,:bgrin:
hanya yang empunya diri saje yang tahu
kharrrrr kharrrr kharrrrr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
how do u know wether it is a durian or not..? maybe it is a rambutan!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats right bro, its ain't the durian that you think it is. You've been taught all your life that this rambutan is a durian, you've obviously been taught wrong buddy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All this while we ate durian..and suddenly came this phallus by name debmey,claim that the durian we ate is a rambutan instead! eventhough he never ate neither durian nor rambutan....so what shall we call this phallus..? tikus nak baiki labu is it..? is it suit you debmey..? ahaks we never ever buy your argument la JOe.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 27-3-2007 09:33 AM
Author
