|
View: 3350|Reply: 1
|
Mahathir vs Anwar is a possibility in PP
[Copy link]
|
|
|
JK's Digest No. 8 of August 2008 (445-447 of 2008) Be prepared for another wave of political tsunami
In the socalled theocracy of a socalled secular system, any thing is possible. How rotten can this be? Joshua Kong is saying his piece as a "reigning" or "Yun Chee" as a survived small man.
1. Tun Dr Mahathir versus Anwar Ibrahim in Permatang Pauh
2. AAB and his rhetoric "Many faiths in one naions"
3. Who are the "pirates" in Malaysia? - Mahathir knows.
.
1. Tun Dr Mahathir versus Anwar Ibrahim in Permatang Pauh
P044 is in a war zone for at least the next three weeks in August, 2008 because it is to be an end to a war with Anwar. Was Ijok bad enough at the by election 2007?
A FLASH BACK - Why so far only State seats for for such trials in 2007? The first one in 2007 was the Batu Talam (Double faces) in January (Pahang - Malay seat), then Machap (Malaysia Chapter or Malaysia Agreement) in Malacca (Chinese seat), and then Ijok in Selangor (Indian seat). Why three seats for three major races in Malaysia?Now in a Parliament seat at PP or P044 for a Malays majority seat in Penang once the seat of Sir Francis Light. How can there be light in die die area?Who can provide the light at PP? Mahathir or Anwar or better known as DSAI.Mahathir may mean LIGHT in Hindu hence an end with "madness" of sort for Malaysia and Anwar may mean "end with a war" for Malaysia - once in a team until 2nd Sept 1998. This conflict or war was predicted in prophecy titled "TO THE LAND CALLED DISARRAY" in October 1997 http://www.antioch.com.sg/my/asc/index.htm. where Joshua Kong is the small man there.CASE STUDY revisited:-
People believe becos Anwar succeeded in Sabah: Chandra
09 August, 2008
Kuala Lumpur: Political scientist Dr Chandra Muzaffar said Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's incessant drive to topple the Government through crossovers had created so much uncertainty in the country in the last few months.
"If the threat of crossovers hangs like a Sword of Damocles over the nation's head, it is partly because many Malaysians know that Anwar as a BN and Federal Government leader at one time had played a pivotal role in the overthrow of the democratically elected PBS State Government in Sabah in 1994," he said.
To Chandra, why only blame Anwar when Mahathir was also involved then in a team?
So let this by election in PP or P044 - die die - Mathathir and Anwar come out with their versions as they had directed the drama at the Istana ground at Kota Kinabalu, Sabah in March 1994 which ended with terrible waves of dramas when UMNO grabbed power in Sabah. (grab deal done earlier with UMNO). There is a terrible story of the aftermath of the stand off at the Istana ground on Sunday where the President of PBS was in a vehicle waiting to be sworn in as there were rumours of hopping of elected Assemblymen of the victorious parties with 2 extra seats only. Who made the people behind the power at the Istana ground to pay a very heavy price as there were supposed to be no sworn in but it happened later and yet the newly sworn in State Government collapsed within days when the Chief Minister resigned.
Now Sabah had gone through terrible sufferings since 1994 as all those elections promises made by UMNO and BN were hardly fulfilled even in 1999, 2000, 2004 and 2008. So hopefully with P044 at PP, there is people power (PP) in Sabah when BN as led by UMNO is now non existent when SAPP is out of the BN technically.
But this PP or people power cannot come from Anwar Ibrahim or DSAI as he knows what he had in Sabah in years he has been in the Mahathir's Cabinet especially in 1994 until he was sacked in 1998.
Sabah is a strange place for leaders who had done harm to Sabah like those before since 1963. Macapagal was sort of overthrown by Marcos who himself went into oblivion in a people power in Manila, Sukarno lost power in 1965 to a military coup; Sultan of Brunei abdicated for his very young teen son in 1965; Tungku Abdul Rahman lost power in 1970 prematurely; Tun Razak also perished prematurely; Mahathir soon had to resigned after I published my book "EPIC of Sabah" in July 2002. The Chief Minister of Sarawak also lost power to his young nephew but the anger prevailed till recently (Ming Hotel uprising); Tengku Razaleigh never made it to the PM till today when his Semangat 46 failed in 1990 even in Sabah. Harris Salleh lost power at the socalled height in power in 1985 unexpectedly and never came back despite several attempts at General Elections ; Tun Mustapha lost power in 1975 suddenly and never recovered his power base despite several attempts at general elections and died a desperate fallen man.
All these political developments only made Sabah and Sabahans to be poorer by the years exacerbated by the UMNO's grab of power in 1994 and why should Anwar to be the Prime Minister of Malaysia (if ever he made it) to do more harm for Sabah as his earlier deeds are unforgiveable. Nevertheless, he had sort of paid for it since 1998.
Tun Musa Hitam (MH) also paid for it because of Sabah in 1985 over the reversal of a power grab by USNO and Berjaya. MH was blamed for the decision in the interest of socalled democracy in Sabah when PBS was given the chance to rule in Sabah. Today MH sits on prominent bodies in Malaysia.
Is it the curse of RAHMAN (acromyn for leadership succession) or our leaders in Malaysia for the rotten system and its rottenness in the nation?
So it is an issue for Mahathir to settle as he was very much in the power game of RAHMAN (sort of rotten system) so that it can come to an END for N once and for all. RAHMAN is now seen as a rotten system because of its rottenness (self destruction by its own bias policies namely NEP-dubious social apartheid contract-, ethnic cleansing in project IC or Project Mahathir) and the wildness (so many killings seen and unseen) by greedy leaders. The big picture is GREED to be seen as Governments' Rampant Excesses, Exploitation and Destruction in tsunami of illegals and illegalities as such situations are resolved by money, bribes and corruption.
So it is now for Mahathir to resolve this END of RAHMAN by standing against Anwar to end the war started in 1969. Mahathir was supporting Najib to be the N but the support was withdrawn recently because of C4 (dead end) and Anna Anna Ang, Aminah Ang, Altantuya (6 As).
So a new system without RAHMAN - a system of profligacy - is now desirable to be helmed by Joshua Kong for the good of all. NGOs please get ready for this humble role to rebuild the nation. You now can see it that Khazanah holding had suddenly appointed DSP Andrew Sheng as member so that it can go in a big way into businesses with China but I would say it is too little and too late to miss out the Olympic 2008. Why China now and only now? Hopefully it is not another deception of the 'lost' and 'sleepy' leaders in desperation.
2. AAB and his rhetoric "Many faiths in one nation"
Why the illegal Prime Minister has not said anything about the Bar Council's forum on Conversion of Islam as far as it affected the other faiths in Malaysia? AAB was telling the religious group MCBHS that it was good for Malaysia with many faiths in harmony and yet there was a terrible public outburst by the Muslims on 9th August, 2008 in Kuala Lumpur. Every one in Malaysia knows the deep rooted problems of the rotten system as far as the Federal Constitution and religions are concerned but nobody at the legislative level is keen to resolve the issues in the open. It is too costly to go to Courts - civil or syariah - for such settlement when the bread earners passed away and the families concerned would likely lose everything in the socalled legacy if there is anything left? The taxpayers should not bear the legal costs but Muslims should pay for such legal costs if they are not prepared to resolve this issue openly. I believe the root of the problem lies in the Federal Constitution as there is no limit as far as Islam is concerned in its application especially there are different versions of interpretation. When Islam as a theocracy, it is like any legal system subject to interpretation by some people including the jurists and judges in a secular system as in Malaysia and elsewhere. How does the nation walks the talk if no forums on such issues is allowed in objective environment when there are many faiths in the nation? If some groups are allowed to do demonstration while others are not, then it is the ugly manifestations of anarchy taking deep root in the nation no matter what some may think about them when the nation is rotting in the Food and Fuel Prices Upheaval.
(part 1 of 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Category: Belia & Informasi
|
Post time 11-8-2008 10:01 PM
变色卡
Author
