|
|
Suri Cruise could be Katie抯 ex Chris Klein抯 baby - Enquirer
[Copy link]
|
|
|
muka nampak mcm tom... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kadang2 muka suri macam Tom.. kadang2 macam Kate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cute suri ni...muka macam bapak dia..tang mata especially...sib baik tak blonde.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There抯 a lot of circumstantial evidence that suggests that Suri Cruise might not have been born on April 18, 2006 as claimed. First, her birth certificate wasn抰 signed by anyone who actually saw Katie or Suri in the hospital and wasn抰 issued for a full 20 days after her birth date. It took a full five months for anyone to catch a glimpse of little Suri, when she made her big debut in the October, 2006 issue of Vanity Fair. That seemed extremely suspicious back then, but Britney managed to hide Jayden James for a longer period of time so it抯 not necessarily a red flag. The Scientologists also have this thing where babies can抰 be exposed to negative influences or something, so that was also cited as a potential reason to have kept Suri under wraps for so long.
A lot of people speculated that Suri wasn抰 born in April at all, and cited photos of Katie抯 Holmes growing and shrinking bump to show that there was some funny business going on. One photo in particular that made us scratch our heads had Katie looking like she was smuggling a beach ball under her top. There are theories that Suri isn抰 Tom Cruise抯 biological baby and that Katie was instead pregnant with her ex Chris Klein抯 child when she met Tom just a month after her breakup with Chris. Cruise was rumored to be sterile or at least unable to successfully reproduce, given the fact that he had no biological children with ex wife Nicole Kidman and she suffered some miscarriages during their marriage. The curious way that Suri was kept from the public and the lack of convincing evidence of her birthdate were used as evidence that she could be older than Holmes and Cruise claimed, which made her paternity up to question.
Now there抯 some hearsay to add to the rumor that Suri is Chris Klein抯 and not Tom抯 baby. The National Enquirer has a source this week that claims to have had a conversation with Chris that suggested that Katie was pregnant when they broke up back in March of 2005. Their source also passed a lie detector test, but that抯 possible with the help of some medication so you can抰 put much faith in that. The Enquirer never says outright that Suri must be Chris |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
manyak2 anak artis hollywood memang si suri nilah yg plg cantik aku pnh tgk
ciptaan Tuhan yg sempurna |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #186 aYuGiLeR's post
hisss....tak caya laa.....
as know as lisa tahu laa ttg tom cruise nih, dia nih seorg yg teliti dlm hubungannya gan pompuan.... dia jenis akan siasat dulu latar belakang pompuan dia kawan...termasuk laa gan holmes nih, siap hantar detektif selidik seseorg tuh dulu....then baru nak serius ke tak... & ttg suri tuh, from the beginning holmes preggy pun, cruise yg kira all day....jaga...bla bla bla....he should know kalau suri bukan dr benihnya pun... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #188 Eddlisa_uyuk's post
|
tapi keadaan perut katie masa dia mengandung mmg sangat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ish
mcm2 la
tnggu n lihat jew lah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ishh..macam2 spekulasi nih.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #186 aYuGiLeR's post
|
to claim that tom is sterile is absurd lah..nicole kidman kept her placenta (her 2nd miscarried) as evidence in case anyone said that it wasn't tom's baby..Tom tak mandul lah, furthermore Suri look nothing like Chris Klein..Anyway Enquiry is a TRASH magazine.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #192 nour2001's post
|
it's a gossip board darling.. we can assume @ say what ever we want... trash @ not it is still a juicy gossip. why are you so mad about this gossip anyway? derang ni kafir belaka.. don't be too obsess.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 12-12-2007 03:56 PM
Post time 28-1-2008 05:41 PM
