kawen kontrak?

fawabi

Assalamualaikum, salam jumaat,
Ada satu pertanyaan. katakanlah.. satu senario, seorang perempuan berkahwin secara senyap2 (umpama ikat kontrak dlm tempoh tertentu) dengan seorang lelaki. menggunakan wali hakim. si lelaki seorang yang kuat berpengaruh lagi kaya, perempuan ini, berkahwin dgnnya kerana tidak mahu melakukan zina (lelaki kaya kan suka cari mistress, kan) demi untuk mengelak penzinaan, mereka bersetuju utk bernikah tp hanya utk sesuatu tempoh sahaja. dan perkahwinan ini perlu di rahsiakan, pertama, tidak mahu melukakan hati isteri pertama lelaki tersebut, kedua, kerana tempoh yang amat singkat, jadi, tak payahlah nak involve keluarga. ketiga, sekiranya mereka berhubung badan, tak lah berdosa sebab dah ada ikatan nikah.
soalan saya, sah ke nikah mereka, kalau mereka guna wali hakim, sedangkan bapa si perempuan ini hidup lagi?  sah jugak ke nikah depa ni, even depa tak daftar nikah depa kat sini (kira depa tak declare kata depa menikah lah) lessay tempoh nikah 3 bulan. lepas 3 bulan, depa divorce, pas tu masing2 go on with their own life.? dan katalah, selepas bercerai, dan perempuan ini berkahwin lain, tapi menggunakan status "anak dara" dalam surat nikah hat lagi satu tu? apa hukum? berdosa kah pompan ni kalau dia merahsiakan hal pernikahan pertamanya pada bakal suaminya? agak kompius saya,...
benda ni belum jadi lagi.. tapi sekadar satu pertanyaan yang mungkin kita boleh bincangkan.. sebab sekarang ni ramai org kawen senyap2.. dgn dato' mato'.. tapi have to keep discreet sebab tak mahu datin matin tahu ke, tak mau perangbesar ke.. apa lah.. so,.. itulah, kot ada pakar yang boleh dirujuk.. timaseh..

[ Last edited by  ibnur at 31-3-2007 11:26 PM ]

ibnur

mualaikumsalam warahmatullah,

ni macam konfius jer ni.  syiah+sunni.  ???  macam mutaah pun ada, macam lafaz taqlik pun ada.  

pasal wali hakim tu, wali hakim di mana tu?  Adakah jaraknya lebih 2 marhalah?  di indon ke? di narathiwat ke?  atau dia orang pakai wali hakim syiah supaya boleh mutaah?  

kalau belum berlaku, dinasihatkan jangan buat.

fawabi

dalam perancangan nak menikah kot? macam ni, pompan ni diofer jadi gundek pada lelaki kaya ni. tapi dia tak mau la buat dosa, she said, fine if u wanna be with me, but kawen lah, buat apa nak berzina kan? because this man offers her all things money can buy lah. pompan ni orang susah, banyak tanggungan.. u know it's  like golden opportunity kan,.. and some more lelaki tu bersetuju nak kawen dgn dia, cuma syaratnye, hanya utk bebrapa bulan sahaja, coz this man is so committed dgn wifey dia (so he said lah). lagipun niat asal just nak jadikan this woman his gundek aje kan.. this woman has agreed, and katanye, akan dinikahkan dia malaysia jugak,.. sebab ada "kadhi" yang boleh setelkan hal nikah mereka. canner ek?
itulah, yang buat saya musykil.. apa hukumnya di sisi Islam, left alone malaysia punye rules lah.. i nak tau dari segi syarak. sah ke, atau tidak. patutke kita menghalang kejadian begini dari berlaku? one more thing, syarat nikah mereka, they will  not have anak.. (sbg langkah keselamatan lah agaknya.. )
silalah tunjukkan jalan kebenaran. timaseh

ibnur

kalau kat malaysia, mana boleh pakai ni.  ini macam 'kadhi' sindiket ajer.  

nikah jer la betul-betul utk selama hayat.  bukannya haram kawin ni.  boleh 4 pun.  
yang lelaki tu takut bini no.1 agaknya.  tuhan tak takut ke?

ooo...  kalo sindiket punya kadi tu, tak sah nikahnya.

[ Last edited by  ibnur at 21-4-2006 08:49 PM ]

fawabi

maksaklahnye... kadhi ni bukan kadhi sindiket,.. tapi dia sanggup nikahkan pasangan ni. (mebbe kena rasuah ke apa ke.. wallahua'lam lah) itu yang agak musykil. itulah,.. selalunye manusia yang lagha ni memang lagi takut kat bini/ polis/mak ayah/bos dsbnya daripada ALLAH YANG ESA.
jadiknye apa kesimpulannye ek? nikah dorang ni sah tak agaknye ikut hukum syarak? boleh pakai ke nikah macam ni? seriau jugak bila bicara soal hukum Tuhan ni kan?
Semoga ALLAH mengampunkan kejahilan saya. Amin

Gravedigger

Originally posted by fawabi at 21-4-2006 09:02 PM
maksaklahnye... kadhi ni bukan kadhi sindiket,.. tapi dia sanggup nikahkan pasangan ni. (mebbe kena rasuah ke apa ke.. wallahua'lam lah) itu yang agak musykil. itulah,.. selalunye manusia yang lagh ...

Baguih juga persoalan ko ini?? Mungkin ada ulama-ulama ASWJ yang boleh memberikan jawapannya. Kalau dalam syiah takder masalah sebab boleh kawin secara mutaah. Kalau dah ada akad dan mahar serta persetujuan antara lelaki dan perempuan maka sahlah mereka sebagai suami isteri walaupun dalam tempoh-tempoh tertentu.Dengan cara ini maka terelaklah mereka daripada melakukan perzinaan.( Lihat perbincangan dalam ruangan mazhab).

Pernah dengar cerita ada seorang pegawai dari Utara yang berkursus di KL. Semasa didalam kapalterbang beliau berkenalan dengan seorang pegawai wanita yang juga akan berkursus di KL. Lalu mereka pun jatuh intim dan berpakat untuk tinggal sebilik di hotel tertentu. Disebabkan wanita tersebut lebih menyintai kariernya maka ia tidak mahu terikat dan duduklah mereka sebagai suami isteri tanpa ada ikatan-ikatan tertentu. Habis kursus depa pun berpisah dan masing-masing bawa haluannya sendiri.

ibnur

Originally posted by Gravedigger at 21-4-2006 10:06 PM


Baguih juga persoalan ko ini?? Mungkin ada ulama-ulama ASWJ yang boleh memberikan jawapannya. Kalau dalam syiah takder masalah sebab boleh kawin secara mutaah. Kalau dah ada akad dan mahar sert ...

tapi kan grave, ko kata ari tu, anak dara kena ada wali kalau nak mutaah.  jadi yang ni dia tak moh pakai wali, tak leh pakai la mutaah kau tu.

ibnur

Originally posted by fawabi at 21-4-2006 09:02 PM
maksaklahnye... kadhi ni bukan kadhi sindiket,.. tapi dia sanggup nikahkan pasangan ni. (mebbe kena rasuah ke apa ke.. wallahua'lam lah) itu yang agak musykil. itulah,.. selalunye manusia yang lagh ...

wali hakim tu sultan dan agong.  naib kadi dengan kadi tu wakil sultan dan agong.  
aku masih tak paham ler.  siapa kadi ni? kalau main rasuah kira tak leh pakai ler.
kalau bukan sindiket, mesti dia yang dilantik kerajaan (atau sultan le tu).  kalau dah gomen punya, mesti nak ikut undang-undang dan hukum yang betul ni.

kau nasihatkan ler perempuan tu.  biar papa asal tak berdosa.

Normala17

lepas nih jangan tak percaya pelacur pun boleh sediakan khidmat juru nikah... home delivery lagi...

better than berzina kan ?... :hmm:

Muntz

actually aku nak try gak kawin kontrak nie.. sajer utk mengaburi mata family aku. takut nanti kena tuduh gay pulak. padahal aku malas nak kawin2 nie.

Gravedigger

Originally posted by ibnur at 21-4-2006 10:21 PM



tapi kan grave, ko kata ari tu, anak dara kena ada wali kalau nak mutaah.  jadi yang ni dia tak moh pakai wali, tak leh pakai la mutaah kau tu.

Oooops betul juga apa ko katakan. Dalam syiah anak dara kalau nak kahwin mesti ada wali sebab dia masih dibawah tanggungan bapanya kecuali janda yang boleh buat keputusan sendiri. Dalam kes ini nampaknya tak bolehlah pakai mutaah tu tapi nampaknya ada juga sensitiviti terhadap takut nak buat zina. Alhamdulillah nampaknya  mereka ni nak nikah untuk elakkan zina.
Ini lebih baik sikit kot daripada yang terus-terusan berzina tanpa ikatan apa-apa yang kalau ko lihat di kondommaniam kat KL tu bersepah-sepah perempuan yang duduk sorang-sorang kerja mengangkang saja. Heran ya gaji kecik tapi pakai kereta mewah dan hidup bergaya...sekali-sekala dato'-dato' datang hantar bekalan saja weh.

Normala17

Sekali dengar memang pelik tapi saya percaya this is a compromise - a choice of a lesser evil - bagi mengelakkan a promiscuous life. At least, practitioner akan stick to one partner.

Ada sesapa yang boleh ringkas kan bagaimana rasional kelonggaran ini dalam bahasa mudah ? Kalau pernah dibincang boleh provide link ?

Really curious.

Terima Kasih.

Gravedigger

Originally posted by Muntz at 23-4-2006 09:50 AM
actually aku nak try gak kawin kontrak nie.. sajer utk mengaburi mata family aku. takut nanti kena tuduh gay pulak. padahal aku malas nak kawin2 nie.

Aikks...ini satu kes lain pulak nie. Awat tak mau kawin...menyesal nanti kalau kawin lambat??

ibnur

kalau nak kontrek jugak, masuk syiah terus, jangan nak sekerat sini sekerat sana.

Hadith sahih muslim
Chapter 3 :TEMPORARY MARRIAGE AND ITS PROHIBITION FOR ALL TIMES TO COME

Abdullah (b. Mas'ud) reported: We were on an expedition with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and we had no women with us.We said: Should we not have ourselves castrated?He (the Holy Prophet) forbade us to do so He then granted us permission that we should contract temporary marriage for a stipulated period giving her a garment, and 'Abdullah then recited this verse: 'Those who believe do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you, and do not transgress.Allah does not like trangressers" (al-Qur'an, v. 87).

This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Jarir with the same chain of transmitters and he also recited this (above-mentioned verse) to us, but he did not say that 'Abdullah recited it.

This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Isma'il with the same chain of transmitters (and the words are): "We were young, so we said: Allah's Messenger, should we not have ourselves castrated?But he (the narrator) did not say; We were on an expedition."

Jabir b. 'Abdullah and Salama b. al-Akwa' said: There came to us the proclaimer of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) has granted you permission to benefit yourselves, i.e. to contract temporary marriage with women.

Salama b. al.Akwa' and Jabir b. Abdullah reported: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) came to us and permitted us to contract temporary marriage.

Ibn Uraij reported: 'Ati' reported that jibir b. Abdullah came to perform 'Umra, and we came to his abode, and the people asked him about different things, and then they made a mention of temporary marriage, whereupon he said: Yes, we had been benefiting ourselves by this temporary marriage during the lifetime of theHoly Prophet (may peace be upon him) and during the tinie of Abi! Bakr and 'Umar.

Jabir b. 'Abdullah reported: We contracted temporary marriage giving a handful of (tales or flour as a dower during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and durnig the time of Abu Bakr until 'Umar forbade it in the case of 'Amr b. Huraith.

Abu Nadra reported: While I was in the company of Jabir b. Abdullah, a person came to him and said that Ibn 'Abbas and Ibn Zubair differed on the two types of Mut'as (Tamattu' of Hajj 1846 and Tamattu' with women), whereupon Jabir said: We used to do these two during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him).Umar then forbade us to do them, and so we did not revert to them.

Iyas b. Salama reported on the authority of his father that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) gave sanction for contracting temporary marriage for three nights in the year of Autas 1847 and then forbade it.

Sabra Juhanni reported: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) permitted temporary marriage for us.So I and another person went out and saw a woman of Bana 'Amir, who was like a young long-necked she-camel. We presented ourselves to her (for contracting temporary marriage), whereupon she said: What dower would you give me?I said: My cloak.And my companion also said: My cloak. And the cloak of-my companion was superior to my cloak, but I was younger than he. So when she looked at the cloak of my companion she liked it, and when she cast a glance at me I looked more attractive to her.She then said: Well, you and your cloak are sufficient for me.I remained with her for three nights, and then Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: He who has any such woman with whom he had contracted temporary marriage, he should let her off.

Rabi' b. Sabra reported that his father went on an expedition with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) during the Victory of Mecca, and we stayed there for fifteen days (i.e. for thirteen full days and a day and a night), and Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) permitted us to contract temporary marriage with women.So I and another person of my tribe went out, and I was more handsome than he, whereas he was almost ugly.Each one of us had a cloaks, My cloak was worn out, whereas the cloak of my cousin was quite new. As we reached the lower or the upper side of Mecca, we came across a young woman like a young smart long-necked she-camel.We said: Is it possible that one of us may contract temporary marriage with you? She said: What will you give me as a dower?Each one of us spread his cloak. She began to cast a glance on both the persons. My companion also looked at her when she was casting a glance at her side and he said: This cloak of his is worn out, whereas my cloak is quite new. She, however, said twice or thrice: There is no harm in (accepting) this cloak (the old one). So I contracted temporary marriage with her, and I did not come out (of this) until Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) declared it forbidden.

Rabi' b. S'abra al-jahanni reported on the authority of his father.We went with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) to Mecca during the year of Victory and he narrated like this a hadith transmitted by Bishr (the previous one) but with this addition: "She said: Can it be possible?" And it is also mentioned in it: "He said: The cloak of this (man) is old and worn out."

Sabra al-Juhanni reported on the authority of his father that while he was with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon hm) he said: 0 people, I had permitted you to contract temporary marriage with women, but Allah has forbidden it (now) until the Day of Resurrection.So he who has any (woman with this type of marriage contract) he should let her off, and do not take back anything you have given to then (as dower).

This hadith has been narrated on the authority of 'Abd al-'Aziz b 'Umar with the same chain of transmitters, and he said: I saw Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) standing between the pillar and the gate (of the Ka'ba) and he was relating a hadith as narrated by Ibn Numair.

'Abd al-Malik b. Rabi' b. Sabraal-Juhanni reported on the authority of his father who narrated it on the authority of his father (i e. 'Abd al-Malik's grandfather, Sabura al-juhanni): Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) permitted us to contract temporary marriage in the Year of Victory, as we entered Mecce, and we did come out of it but he forbade us to do it.

Sabra b. Ma'bad reported that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) permitted his Companions to contract temporary marriage with women in the Year of Victory.So I and a friend of mine from Banu Sulaim went out, until we found a young woman of Banu Amir who was like a young she-camel having a long neck.We made proposal to her for contracting temporary marriage with us, and presented to her our cloaks (as dower).She began to look and found me more handsome than my friend, but found the cloak of my friend more beautiful than my cloak. She thought in her wind for a while, but then preferred me to my friend.So I remained with her for three (nights), and then Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) commanded us to part with them (such women).

Rabi' b. Sabra reported on the authority of his father that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) prohibited the contracting of temporary marriage.

Rabi' b. Sabra reported on the authority of his father that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) forbade on the Day of Victory to contract temporary marriage with women.This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Rabi' b. Sabra that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) forbade to contracf temporary marriage with women at the time of Victory, and that his father had contracted the marriage for two red cloaks.

'Urwa b. Zabair reported that 'Abdullah b. Zubair (Allah be pleased with him) stood up (and delivered an address) in Mecca saying: Allah has made blind the hearts of some people as He has deprived them of eyesight that they give religious verdict in favour of temporary marriage, while he was alluding to a person (Ibn 'Abbas). Ibn Abbas called him and said: You are an uncouth person, devoid of sense.By my life, Mut'a was practised during the lifetime of the leader of the pious (he meant Allah's Messenger, may peace be upon him), and Ibn Zubair said to him: just do it yourselves, and by Allah, if you do that I will stone you with your stones.Ibn Shihab said.Khalid b. Muhajir b. Saifullah informed me: While I was sitting in the company of a person, a person came to him and he asked for a religious verdict about Mut'a and he permitted him to do it.Ibn Abu 'Amrah al-Ansari (Allah be pleased with him) said to him: Be gentle.It was permitted in- the early days of Islam, (for one) who was driven to it under the stress of necessity just as (the eating of) carrion and the blood and flesh of swine and then Allah intensified (the commands of) His religion and prohibited it (altogether).Ibn Shihab reported: Rabi' b. Sabra told me that his father (Sabra) said: I contracted temporary marriage with a woman of Banu 'Amir for two cloaks during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him); then he forbade us to do Mut'a.Ibn Shihab said: I heard Rabi' b. Sabra narrating it to Umar b. 'Abd al-'Aziz and I was sitting there.

Sabra al-Juhanni reported on the authority of his father: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) prohibited the contracting of temporary marriage and said: Behold, it is forbidden from this very day of yours to the Day of Resurrection, and he who has given something (as a dower) should not take it back.

ni pun aku buang sikit sebab terlalu banyak pakai memori.

ibnur

oh ya...  nanti ada yang baca hadith kata masa saidina abu bakar dengan umar tu ada muta'ah dan jugak muta'ah pernah dibenarka.

jawapnya...  sila check kedudukan hadith mana yang lebih kuat.  

dan muta'ah hanya dibenarkan 2 kali sahaja.  itupun rasulullah yang benarkan.  orang lain jangan nak memandai.

Gravedigger

Originally posted by ibnur at 23-4-2006 02:04 PM
oh ya...  nanti ada yang baca hadith kata masa saidina abu bakar dengan umar tu ada muta'ah dan jugak muta'ah pernah dibenarka.

jawapnya...  sila check kedudukan hadith mana yang lebih kuat.  
...

Ya silakan check hadis mana yang lebih kuat lagi. Amat mengherankan sekali hadis yang menerangkan haramnya nikah muta'ah hanya diriwayatkan oleh Sabirah dan keluarganya saja, pada hal kaum Muslimin yang ikut serta menyaksikan pembukaan kota Mekah di kala Rasulullah saaw berdiri di atas mimbar juga ramai. Kemudian kenapa penduduk asli Mekkah yang juga ikut serta menyaksikan saat itu tidak meriwayatkannya? Dan kenapa Ibnu Masud, Ibnu Abbas, Jabir bin Abdullah, Imam Ali AS dan pembesar-pembesar sahabat lainnya juga tidak meriwayatkannya agar dapat dijadikan dalil?
Bukhari sendiri tidak memasukkan dalam kitab sahihnya. Ini pertanda bahawa beliau tidak menganggap hadis tersebut shahih, pada hal beliau memerlukan hadis itu untuk dijadikan dalil atas keharamannya. Kalau hadis tersebut shahih, maka tidak mungkin beliau akan diam.

dan muta'ah hanya dibenarkan 2 kali sahaja.  itupun rasulullah yang benarkan.  orang lain jangan nak memandai.

Aikk awat pulak kontradik dengan kenyataan ko sebelum ini?? Maksudnya memang pernahlah Rasulullah saaw menghalalkan zina...oops sorry, aku maksudkan muta'ah.  

ibnur

Originally posted by Gravedigger at 23-4-2006 09:51 PM
Ya silakan check hadis mana yang lebih kuat lagi. Amat mengherankan sekali hadis yang menerangkan haramnya nikah muta'ah hanya diriwayatkan oleh Sabirah dan keluarganya saja, pada hal kaum Muslimin yang ikut serta menyaksikan pembukaan kota Mekah di kala Rasulullah saaw berdiri di atas mimbar juga ramai. Kemudian kenapa penduduk asli Mekkah yang juga ikut serta menyaksikan saat itu tidak meriwayatkannya? Dan kenapa Ibnu Masud, Ibnu Abbas, Jabir bin Abdullah, Imam Ali AS dan pembesar-pembesar sahabat lainnya juga tidak meriwayatkannya agar dapat dijadikan dalil?
Bukhari sendiri tidak memasukkan dalam kitab sahihnya. Ini pertanda bahawa beliau tidak menganggap hadis tersebut shahih, pada hal beliau memerlukan hadis itu untuk dijadikan dalil atas keharamannya. Kalau hadis tersebut shahih, maka tidak mungkin beliau akan diam.

Aikk awat pulak kontradik dengan kenyataan ko sebelum ini?? Maksudnya memang pernahlah Rasulullah saaw menghalalkan zina...oops sorry, aku maksudkan muta'ah.   

larr.. kan dah jadik debat syiah sunni...  

saja aku letak riwayat ibnu masud dengan jabir sekali, biaq bagi adil...  aku agak dah kau mesti masuk punya...  

jadik aku kata awal-awal lagi....  kalo nak kawen konterk masuk syiah, tok sah dok dalam mazhab syafie.  tak baik main sekerat-sekerat.  


tapi tak apa...  kan saidina ali tu bapa kepada muslimin...  jadik tak cukup power la kalau riwayat tu dari ibnu masud, jabir dan ibnu abbas  ...  kan kan kan kan...


Book 8, Number 3263:
'Ali b. AbiTalib reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) prohibited on the Day of Khaibar the contracting of temporary marriage with women and the eating of the flesh of domestic asses.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 8, Number 3264:
Malik narrated this hadith on the authority of the same chain of trans- witters that 'Ali b. Abil Talib said to a person: You are a person led astray; Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) forbade us (to do Mut'a), as is stated In the hadith transmitted on the authority of Yahya b. Malik.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 8, Number 3265:
Muhammad b. 'Ali narrated on the authority of his father 'Ali that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) on the Day of Khaibar prohibited for ever the contracting of temporary marriage and eating of the flesh of the domestic asses.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 8, Number 3266:
'Ali (Allah be pleased with him) heard that Ibn Abbas (Allah be pleased with them) gave some relaxation in connection with the contracting of temporary marriage, whereupon he said: Don't be hasty (in your religious verdict), Ibn 'Abbas, for Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the Day of Khaibar prohibited for ever the doing of it-And eating of the flesh of domestic asses.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book 8, Number 3267:
'Ali (Allah be pleased with him) said to Ibn 'Abbas (Allah be pleased with them) that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the Day of Khaibar forbade forever the contracting of temporary marriage and the eating of the flesh of domestic asses.

Gravedigger

Originally posted by ibnur at 23-4-2006 10:25 PM

tapi tak apa...  kan saidina ali tu bapa kepada muslimin...  jadik tak cukup power la kalau riwayat tu dari ibnu masud, jabir dan ibnu abbas  ...  kan kan kan kan...

Hehehee...ni syok juga bahas tentang hadis mengharamkan nikah muta'ah yang disandarkan dari Imam Ali. Ada 5 hadis tu yang berturut-turutan tu. Takpa lah nanti marah pulak forumners yang lain ataupun nanti mod pindahkan lak ke board mazhab. Ni sudah keluar sikit dari tajuk ni! Kita bincang di board mazhab udah ler. Sapa yang berminat bolehlah join sekaki.

Sebelum tu hadis dari Imam Ali tu adalah pada hari peperangan Khaibar dan hadis pengharaman muta'ah sebelum tu adalah semasa pembukaan Mekkah. Ishk..konfius lah!

[ Last edited by  Gravedigger at 23-4-2006 10:48 PM ]

ibnur

ok aku akan bawak quote grave ke thread muta'ah....  jom ke sana.

Syd

Perkahwinan muta'ah haram, tidak diiktiraf di Malaysia - Hakim
Oleh NOR ZAINAH NORDIN

PUTRAJAYA 14 April -Mahkamah Rayuan hari ini berpendapat ia perlu bertanggungjawab untuk memperbetulkan salah anggapan bahawa rakyat Malaysia beragama Islam boleh melangsungkan perkahwinan muta'ah di luar negara dan diiktiraf di sisi undang-undang Islam.

Hakim Datuk Mohd. Noor Abdullah berkata, hanya golongan Syiah Asna-Ashari masih mengakui kahwin muta'ah sebagai satu amalan sah sedangkan kalangan Syiah lain termasuk aliran Ismaili tidak mengiktiraf perkahwinan jenis itu.

Katanya, negara Malaysia mengamalkan mazhab Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah yang berpandangan bahawa nikah muta'ah tidak sah dan haram serta tidak boleh diamalkan.

``Tidak lama dulu, terdapat laporan yang menyatakan pelajar kita di Iran dan Asia Barat mengamalkan nikah kontrak - satu nama lain bagi kahwin muta'ah.

``Dengan ini, biarlah diketahui umum bahawa pernikahan jenis itu adalah haram dan tidak diterima di negara ini. Ia tidak sah dan tidak diiktiraf,'' katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian dalam penghakiman bertulis bagi permohonan kebenaran merayu seorang guru agama, Ishak Shaari terhadap sabitan dan hukuman penjara dua tahun kerana mencabul pelajarnya sendiri yang berusia 14 tahun.

Hakim Mohd. Noor berkata, dalam kes itu, perbuatan Ishak menikahkan dirinya dengan mangsa seolah-olah meniru pernikahan yang diamalkan oleh rakyat Negeri Sabaa' dan pengikut fahaman Zoroaster pada zaman dahulu.

Penghakiman bertulis itu diperoleh hari ini walaupun Mahkamah Rayuan telah menyampaikan keputusan pada 18 Januari lalu yang menolak permohonan Ishak dan mengembalikan hukuman asal penjara empat tahun dan sebatan dua kali yang diputuskan oleh Mahkamah Majistret Alor Gajah, Melaka.

Hakim Datuk Gopal Sri Ram yang bersidang bersama Hakim Datuk Azmel Ma'amor dan Hakim Mohd. Noor menggunakan kuasa sampingan di bawah Peraturan 76 Peraturan-Peraturan Mahkamah Rayuan 1994 dalam membuat keputusan itu.

Peguam pemohon, Datuk Muhammad Shafee Abdullah memaklumkan bahawa tindakan Mahkamah Rayuan sebagai tidak sah dan telah mengemukakan permohonan di Mahkamah Persekutuan untuk menyemak tindakan tersebut. Ia akan didengar pada 22 Mei ini.

Dalam penghakiman bertulis Hakim Sri Ram yang juga diperoleh hari ini, beliau berkata, sekalipun mereka terkhilaf menterjemah peraturan itu, mereka masih boleh bergantung kepada bidang kuasa semulajadi dalam mengekalkan keputusan Mahkamah Majistret.

Katanya, berdasarkan keputusan dua mahkamah terdahulu, Ishak telah menjemput mangsa ke rumah, melaksanakan upacara pernikahan antara dirinya dengan pelajar tersebut dan mencabul mangsa.

``Ini menunjukkan satu kes di mana tertuduh menggunakan kedudukan sebagai guru agama untuk memuaskan nafsu syahwatnya. Ini adalah kesalahan serius dan Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi terkhilaf apabila mengurangkan hukuman,'' katanya.

Pada 28 Januari 2004, Majistret Nor Hasmiza Othman menjatuhkan hukuman penjara empat tahun dan sebat dua kali ke atas Ishak, 42, setelah didapati bersalah mencabul kehormatan pelajar tingkatan dua, 12 tahun lalu.

Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Melaka, Datuk Abu Samah Nordin mengurangkan hukuman itu kepada hanya penjara dua tahun walaupun beliau menolak rayuan Ishak berhubung sabitan.

Pada 14 November tahun lalu, Ishak berjaya mendapat penangguhan hukuman tetapi perintah itu ditarik balik pada 4 Januari lalu. Dia mula menjalani hukuman penjara dari tarikh tersebut.