ini sejenis manusia yg mana org kata sesuatu pasal dia, dia convincekan diri dia yg org kata sesuatu yg lain, justeru itu tuduhan org itu tak benar...ada istilah psikologi utk org sebegini, tapi sel otak x berapa nak berhubung tika ini, lupa
dari awal lagi dia ni sangat konsisten, yg bagi dia, wsj dah tuduh dia songlap usd700juta utk kepentingan peribadi dia, takleh cakap apa dah, mungkin loyar dia pun fail utk yakinkan dia yg wsj x kata gitu pun
actually.. aku pun sama terpikir.. put aside whether the allegation is true or not.. but if i were in the same position as him.. and aku bebtul yakin aku tak bersalah.. i dont need to buy time to sue...as a PM, my reputation has been tarnised by the allegation.. bukan sket2..ni banyak.. sue straight away..tak payah nak LoD , show cause bagai..kalah benang lain cerite.. this is the time aku akan cari the most reputable law firm kat US.. AG pun mesti ada contact US firm kat sana.. start filing suit . as simple as that...why do u need to buy time..
Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's legal letter to The Wall Street Journal has left lawyers puzzled.
For Lawyers for Liberty executive director Eric Paulsen, it is a "bizarre" document.
"How bizarre asking for clarification. Just read the articles yourselves.
"If you don't understand what was written by WSJ or you have something to hide, in all likelihood, the articles were not defamatory," he tweeted.
Contacted later, Paulsen (photo) said any letter of demand should be clear and to the point.
"For defamation, it must state which parts are defamatory, the meanings attributed, the loss of reputation etc. Here, the lawyers are unclear as to which parts are defamatory," he said.
Former de facto law minister Zaid Ibrahim (photo) also tweeted his views on the letter.
Zaid, who previously owned the biggest law firm in the country, said lawyers could write good letters if they are clear what the client wants.
"If the client wants a spin, ask his PR (public relations) guys to do it, not you," he said.
Selangor exco member and lawyer Teng Chang Khim (photo) also expressed surprise.
“If the money did not go to your account, any reasonably competent lawyer will advise you to issue a statement categorically denying it and then issue a letter demanding for apology and in default of which legal action ensues.
“I don't know what happened to you or your lawyer,” he said.
Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's legal letter to The Wa ...
see.. simple kan.. nak buat apa kau nak belok kiri kanan..nak tunggu masa utk sue.. when is the right time to sue? why u dont need a right time to sue.. sue je terus... deny je la...
najib nak saman pon payah amat.. sbb tak paham artikel wsj
org dok kecoh wang rakyat masuk akaun personal dia.. dia dok kalut tak guna duit tu utk diri dia..
deyyyyy... senyum sinis aja la
"For defamation, it must state which parts are defamatory, the meanings attributed, the loss of reputation etc. Here, the lawyers are unclear as to which parts are defamatory," he said.
bila dah takleh terima kenyataan, jadi camni la...
akan cari apa jua kesalahan, malah kesalahan tatabahasa, ejaan, lupa letak noktah, tak guna perkataan yang dikehendaki, tak ikut skema jawapan macai....
macai ingat benda remeh tu boleh kekalkan "kebenaran" tuduhan dorang kot...
abu : basikal aku hilang, kena curi
ahmad : eh, camne boleh jadi camtu?
abu : ko curi kan?? sebab ko tak nafikan
ahmad : nape ko cakap camtu
abu : haaa tengok.. sampai sekarang ko tak nafikan
ahmad : takkan la aku nak curi barang ko, bu
abu : kali ketiga, ko masih tak nafikan
ahmad : aku tak curi!
abu : kenapa ko tak berani sebut perkataan "basikal"??nampak sangat ko nak putar belit...
ahmad : aku tak curi basikal ko!
abu : yela, memang ko tak curi, ko ambil je kan?
ahmad : aku tak curi dan tak ambil basikal ko!
abu : eleh, pencuri mana ngaku dia pencuri
ahmad : abu, aku tak tau mana pergi basikal ko
abu : haaa, aku tak tanya pon mana pergi basikal aku.. ko tetiba vakap ko tak tau, kenape?? dah rase bersalah ke??
ahmad : ya Allah, abu.. nape ko tuduh aku.. aku tak curi basikal ko!
abu : aku nak pinjam duit ko boleh tak.. aku hutang kat along RM10,000.00. bulan ni tak bayar lagi bunga RM1,000 sebulan..
Post time 8-7-2015 09:18 PMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
hzln replied at 8-7-2015 09:00 PM
Lawyers pan Najib's legal letter to WSJ
Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's legal letter to The Wa ...
Kita kita ni yg bukan lawyer dr awal td pun kata letter ni ada yg tak kena...apatah lagi loyer kat us sana yg specialized dlm bidang defamation tu...terus point out...tp depa berkias jugak dr kata stupid tu. Kih kih kih...malu lagi kita org malaysia
susah bercakap dengan orang takleh terima kenyataan ni
If the money did not go to your account, any reasonably competent lawyer will advise you to issue a statement categorically denying it and then issue a letter demanding for apology and in default of which legal action ensues.
“I don't know what happened to you or your lawyer,” he said.
Post time 8-7-2015 08:50 PM
Author
