|
tang kena gang sendiri semua betul muhasabah lah, aku kena gang sendiri, aku abaikan je, usah pertahankan benang yg basah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lagi penjelasan AGC dibakulsampahkan
GEORGE TOWN: A lawyer, who acted for the complainant in the trial of former Penang chief minister Lim Guan Eng and businesswoman Phang Li Koon, has rubbished the explanation given by Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) with regards to their acquittal.
Gunamalar Joorindanjn also demanded that an inquiry be commissioned immediately to investigate the circumstances that led to the acceptance of the letters of representation by both Phang and Lim.
“In the meantime, we call upon the Attorney General to file a notice of appeal within the stipulated time to give the Court of Appeal an opportunity to review the decision of the honourable judge to order an acquittal, instead of a discharge not amounting to an acquittal, was justified, given the circumstances of the case,” she said in a statement made available to the NSTP.
“Therefore, we have reasons to believe, or at least suspect, that the decision of the AGC to enter ‘nolle prosequi’ in this case was not made in good faith,” she stressed.
sumber : www.nst.com.my
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dah boleh agak dah....hampeh!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Betul ke AG tak terlibat? tanya peguam singh pulak
GEORGE TOWN: Why should it be up to Attorney-General (AG) Tommy Thomas to decide whether or not to file an appeal against the acquittal of former Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and businesswoman Phang Li Koon’s corruption charges?
This was the poser raised by senior lawyer Datuk Baljit Singh, who reiterated his call for the prosecution to appeal against the Penang High Court’s decision on Monday.
“Isn’t it not the AG who had recused himself from all deliberations on the case from the onset as mentioned by the Attorney-General’s Chambers (A-GC) Appellate and Trial Division head Datuk Mohamad Hanafiah Zakaria yesterday?
“So, why is it that only he can decide to appeal the case? Is he involved or not involved in the first place?” asked Baljit, who is also Gerakan’s Legal and Human Rights Bureau head.
Meanwhile, Baljit also questioned the so-called “fresh evidence” that had arisen during the cross-examination of prosecution witness, which led to Hanafiah concluding that the case against both accused would not succeed at the end of the prosecution case.
“I want to ask what is this evidence? If there is fresh evidence, why wasn’t it handed over to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to investigate since they had been investigating the case from the very beginning?
“Instead, the MACC too was shocked over the acquittal. Obviously, something is not right here,” he added.
sumber: www.nst.com.my
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bukan senang nak tegakkan benang basah.rakyat sekarang dh terdedah pd berbagai sumber maklumat .lagi byk penjelasan taraf sampah lagi ramai rakyat menyampah. hilang respek pd AG dn sistem perundangan gomen ph. bukan saja nampak hauk tp sememangnya sgt hauk . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perlembagaan dilanggar jika benar Tommy lepas tangan
KUALA LUMPUR: If it is true that Attorney-General (A-G) Tommy Thomas had nothing to do with the withdrawal of Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng’s graft case, then there has been a breach of the Federal Constitution.
Former law minister Tan Sri Dr Rais Yatim tweeted that the revelation by Attorney-General Chamber’s (A-GC) Appellate and Trial Division head Datuk Mohamad Hanafiah Zakaria that the A-G was not involved in the case dismissal pointed to a violation of Article 145 of the Federal Constitution.
“Only the A-G has the power to withdraw a criminal case,” he posted on Twitter yesterday.
Rais’ remarks came amid growing speculation on why and how Lim’s case was withdrawn.
sumber: www.nst.com.my |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by akusukaq at 6-9-2018 11:50 AM
lagi baik bagi alasan kes lge berbeza dgn kes khir toyo sbb banglo lge tk de swimping. yang lni lagi masuk akal netizen.yg lain memang tak ada byk beza nya dr segi jual beli rumah.usah nak temberang.wakakakaka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|