CariDotMy

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

Author: Acong

antara asal usul agama

[Copy link]
 Author| Post time 20-3-2016 12:45 PM | Show all posts
sam1528 replied at 20-3-2016 12:19 PM
LOL , ko tau ke apa thermodynamics ni?

Kita dok cakap ttg kiamat dan mekanisma dia dari sudut s ...

tuhan ko suruh aku bagitau ko bahawa takde syurga & neraka  
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


 Author| Post time 20-3-2016 12:46 PM | Show all posts
sam1528 replied at 20-3-2016 12:13 PM
LOL , baca lah apa yg diberi. Jangan lah bengap sgt ..... ko tak malu ke org lain baca hujah ko yg ...

ko tu org gila...... sejak bila sains sudah buktikan kewujudan tuhan?   

This post contains more resources

You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register

x
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2016 01:40 PM | Show all posts
Acong replied at 20-3-2016 12:45 PM
tuhan ko suruh aku bagitau ko bahawa takde syurga & neraka

LOL , skg dah mengaku bercakap dgn tuhan pulak.

Rasa2 ko ni dah kena tampar kuat sangat ...... dah mereng. Sekali lagi aku tanya , bukti macamana yg ko nak ttg wujudnya syurga / neraka?

Dah kiamat ke skg? Macamana ni 'mat slow'? Last2 ko dah jadi bengap dan mereng dah .... ha ha

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2016 01:52 PM | Show all posts
Acong replied at 20-3-2016 12:46 PM
ko tu org gila...... sejak bila sains sudah buktikan kewujudan tuhan?   

Kan dah bagi 'the first cause argument' yg gunakan pendekatan sains & logik utk buktikan wujudnya tuhan. Ko langsung tak mampu hujah balas melainkan tanya soalan yg sama dgn harapan dapat jawapan berlainan. Macam aku kata ..... orang gila aje berharap demikian.

LOL , no problems with the burden of proof lying on the claimant. Your rhetoric state to utilise the scientific method. Ta da! ..... the 'first cause argument' uses the scientific method by looking into
  • Einstein’s theory of general relativity
  • the red-shifting of light from distant galaxies
  • the cosmic background radiation (which also disproves the oscillating model of the universe)
  • the second law of thermodynamics applied to star formation theory

And using these models to formulate the conclusion of the existence of God with the following premise :
  • Whatever begins to exist requires a cause.
  • The universe began to exist.
  • Therefore, the universe requires a cause.

Until now you are incapable to even question the argument much less provide a counter argument.


Macamana tambi , kemungkinan topik ini terlalu sukar utk kamu yg mempunyai daya pemikiran dan intelek yg rendah.


Atheist macam ko pulak kata tuhan tak wujud. Ok mana bukti ko? The burden of proof is on you claiming that God does not exist. Use the scientific method yeah ..... ha ha. Kalo ko ikut hujah aku .... konsisten mintak ko bagi bukti tiada tuhan gunakan sains ... last2 ko setuju dgn aku gunakan pendekatan sains utk bukti. Yg ko dok bebel selama ni , ko tak sedar ke apa yg ko cakap ...... bengap semacam aje ....


Terkincit lagi 'mat slow' ni .....
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 20-3-2016 02:11 PM | Show all posts
sam1528 replied at 20-3-2016 01:40 PM
LOL , skg dah mengaku bercakap dgn tuhan pulak.

Rasa2 ko ni dah kena tampar kuat sangat ......  ...

mak ko adalah seorg lelaki  
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 20-3-2016 02:12 PM | Show all posts
sam1528 replied at 20-3-2016 01:52 PM
Kan dah bagi 'the first cause argument' yg gunakan pendekatan sains & logik utk buktikan wujudnya  ...

tuhan tak pernah wujud & tidak akan wujud sama sekali  
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 20-3-2016 02:27 PM | Show all posts
Acong replied at 20-3-2016 02:11 PM
mak ko adalah seorg lelaki

Laa ..... dah habis modal ke? Apa daa ko ni , dah tak mampu hujah balas tiba2 kata 'mak ko adalah seorg lelaki' pulak.

Tak ada kelas langsung. Mungkin dah kena tampar kuat sgt kot ..... ha ha

Macamana skg? Lagi sekali aku tanya - bukti macamana yg ko nak ttg syurga / neraka?

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2016 02:29 PM | Show all posts
Acong replied at 20-3-2016 02:12 PM
tuhan tak pernah wujud & tidak akan wujud sama sekali

Tu hanya klaim ko dari fantasy ko atau from your wet dreams.

Ko klaim tuhan tak wujud .... ok mana bukti ko? Bagi bukti dari sudut sains & logik ye.

Oops .... ko tau ke apa makna 'bukti'? Bukti bukan klaim kosong spt ko selalu buat. Hanya 'mat slow' aje buat macam tu .... LOL

Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 21-3-2016 01:16 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Louis CK tu pun dungu... Ada lak org percaya....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-3-2016 01:16 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Louis CK tu pun dungu... Ada lak org percaya....
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 21-3-2016 02:14 AM | Show all posts
sam1528 replied at 20-3-2016 02:29 PM
Tu hanya klaim ko dari fantasy ko atau from your wet dreams.

Ko klaim tuhan tak wujud .... ok m ...

mak ko adalah lelaki   
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-3-2016 09:16 AM | Show all posts

LOL , perangai org yg dah kalah .... kesian

'mat slow' .... 'mat slow' ..... tu lah cabar lagi orang , skg ko dah malu

Bila pulak ko nak bagi bukti yg tuhan tak wujud dari sudut sains & logik? Ha ha  .....

Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 21-3-2016 09:40 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
sam1528 replied at 21-3-2016 09:16 AM
LOL , perangai org yg dah kalah .... kesian

'mat slow' .... 'mat slow' ..... tu lah cabar lagi  ...

Camne nk bukti kan benda yg x wujud? Ko ni mmg bengap

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-3-2016 02:18 PM | Show all posts
Acong replied at 21-3-2016 09:40 AM
Camne nk bukti kan benda yg x wujud? Ko ni mmg bengap

LOL , itu andaian ko aje. Andaian ko bukan betul. Ia hanya ' from your wet dreams'.

Kalo ko kata tak wujud , ok apa bukti yg ko boleh bagi dari sudut sains & logik

Ha ha .... tu lah dia 'mat slow' , kalo ko tak ada jawapan - pasal apa ko cabar org utk buktikan sesuatu.

Kan dah susah skg ..... nampak betul ko ni kureng cerdik.

Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 21-3-2016 05:02 PM | Show all posts
sam1528 replied at 21-3-2016 02:18 PM
LOL , itu andaian ko aje. Andaian ko bukan betul. Ia hanya ' from your wet dreams'.

Kalo ko kat ...

sebab tu aku kata mak ko laki  
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-3-2016 05:10 PM | Show all posts
Acong replied at 21-3-2016 05:02 PM
sebab tu aku kata mak ko laki

Ha ha , ko dah mereng lah 'mat slow'.

Jawapan yg kontradik .... 'mak adalah ko lelaki' ..... macam org kata 'he is a married bachelor'

Ini bukti yg ko ni bengap atau kureng cerdik

Bukan ko yg gatal pungguk cabar org buktikan tuhan wujud. Kalo ko dah cabar makna ko mesti ada bukti yg tuhan tak wujud. Skg macamana 'mat slow'?

Lintang pukang nak lari nampak .... LOL ....

Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


 Author| Post time 21-3-2016 05:59 PM | Show all posts
sam1528 replied at 21-3-2016 05:10 PM
Ha ha , ko dah mereng lah 'mat slow'.

Jawapan yg kontradik .... 'mak adalah ko lelaki' ..... ma ...

mak ko laki.....

pasal tu ko dilahirkan melalui dubur.....

otak ko cuma mengandungi tahi   
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-3-2016 07:16 PM | Show all posts
Edited by sam1528 at 21-3-2016 07:18 PM
Acong replied at 21-3-2016 05:59 PM
mak ko laki.....

pasal tu ko dilahirkan melalui dubur.....

otak ko cuma mengandungi tahi   

LOL , 'mat slow' yg dah kalah debat meroyan.

Cuba cerita sikit macamana mak boleh jadi lelaki ..... belum ada lagi 'medical breakthru' yag beranak melalui dubur

Ha ha , tahi kat otak pulak ..... hmmmm mungkin kepada org yg tak mampu buktikan cabaran dia iaitu tuhan tak wujud ..... dari pendekatan sains & logik ye ...

Laaa .... silap haribulan ko nanti kena potong credit dgn 'big brother' ..... tapi ko tak kisah kan .... dah naik ke otak meroyan ....

Ini lah dia atheist , nak cuba debat berat sebelah asyik dia tanya aje dan mintak bukti. Kalau dia pulak kena bagi bukti ..... lintang pukang cuba nak lari .... tak cukup tanah lari ....

Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 21-3-2016 10:19 PM | Show all posts
Edited by Acong at 21-3-2016 10:20 PM
sam1528 replied at 21-3-2016 07:16 PM
LOL , 'mat slow' yg dah kalah debat meroyan.

Cuba cerita sikit macamana mak boleh jadi lelaki . ...

ko nie lembam kaa?  


masa ko kecil, pernah terhantuk kepala? demam panas?  


camnie laa....... aku guna analogi lain.......

ko nie anak haram.... anak lahir drpd zina.... mak ko zina dgn anjing dan lalu bunting...
pastu ko dilahirkan... nie tuhan ko khabarkan pd aku kejap tadi masa tengah berak  



This post contains more resources

You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register

x
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-3-2016 11:36 PM | Show all posts
Edited by sam1528 at 21-3-2016 11:59 PM
Acong replied at 21-3-2016 10:19 PM
ko nie lembam kaa?  


masa ko kecil, pernah terhantuk kepala? demam panas?  


camnie laa....... aku guna analogi lain.......

ko nie anak haram.... anak lahir drpd zina.... mak ko zina dgn anjing dan lalu bunting...
pastu ko dilahirkan... nie tuhan ko khabarkan pd aku kejap tadi masa tengah berak  
religion fake.jpg(214.79 KB, Downloads: 0)




LOL , ni dah meroyan gila. Ini padah 'mat slow' macam ko yg kureng bijak dan kurang didikan mak bapak (kira2 org yg tak ada ugama lah). Errr , sapa salah yek? Mak bapak ko , yang mungkin dok mencarut depan ko masa ko budak2 kot .... ha ha .... what to do

Macamana ni 'mat slow'? Mana bukti ko dari sudut sains & logik yg tuhan tak wujud? Ha ha , gelak ko pun dah nampak gelak paksa .... 'mat slow' yg dah kalah tapi tak mau mengaku ...

Ha ha , bagi lagi retorik yg sama. Ko paham ke bahasa inggeris? Aku copy paste balik kenyataan aku dari pos#84
LOL , no problems with the burden of proof lying on the claimant. Your rhetoric state to utilise the scientific method. Ta da! ..... the 'first cause argument' uses the scientific method by looking into

    1. Einstein’s theory of general relativity
    2. the red-shifting of light from distant galaxies
    3. the cosmic background radiation (which also disproves the oscillating model of the universe)
    4. the second law of thermodynamics applied to star formation theory


And using these models to formulate the conclusion of the existence of God with the following premise :

    - Whatever begins to exist requires a cause.
    - The universe began to exist.
    - Therefore, the universe requires a cause.


Until now you are incapable to even question the argument much less provide a counter argument.

Bila nak bagi hujah balas atau ko tak mampu? Mungkin bahasa inggeris pon ko tak paham ..... kesian. Lepas tu mengaku pulak tuhan cakap dgn ko ..... Kesian .....

Macamana ni kalo pompuan boleh zina dgn anjing bunting? Genetic makup lain daaa .... mana boleh bunting ..... 'mat slow' macam ko ni buta sains ka? Ada hati pulak tu mintak '... you must follow the scientific method ....'. Ko paham ke apa yg ko baca?

Ha ha ..... I am really enjoying this. I am making a fool out of you ..... which happens to be natural for you .... oops

Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

8-11-2024 10:10 PM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.733718 second(s), 28 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list