Meghan and Harry Planned Money-Making Schemes Long Before They Left the Royal Fold, Embittered Staffers Claim
[CLAIM AND COUNTERCLAIM]
The couple was forthright about making bank when they left for California. But new allegations suggest they had those wheels in motion while they were still working royals.
Tom Sykes Royalist Correspondent Published Jul. 27, 2021 6:48AM ET
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were “clearing the way to make millions” through commercial deals while they were still working members of the British royal family, it has been claimed.
The allegation is one of a series of new charges to be leveled at the couple by disgruntled former employees. Given that provenance, the new allegations will be treated with some skepticism.
However, the fresh claim does jibe with charges made last week that Meghan and David Furnish secretly pitched Netflix as early as 2018 with her idea for an animated series, Pearl, about a girl of the same name who draws inspiration from strong historical female figures. At the time, Meghan was still a fully fledged royal and would have been expected to seek permission from the palace to pitch commercial or non-commercial media projects.
The new allegation reportedly emanates from a small band of former Sussex employees who are are said to be considering whether to dish the dirt on the couple, apparently out of concern that Harry’s forthcoming memoir will not present “a full and accurate picture” of their lives as royals. Former employees have in the past jokingly referred to themselves as the Sussex Survivors Club.
The Daily Mail’s Dan Wootton, the journalist who first broke the news that Harry and Meghan were quitting the U.K., quoted a source in his report late Monday as saying that consideration was being given to a plan to allow former Sussex staffers to put their side of the story to reporters through friends, and that a “blind eye” could be turned to any violation of the Official Secrets Act that typically restricts former employees from divulging details of their royal appointments.
Wootton quotes a source as saying that the former staffers are “convinced” the book aims to “settle scores,” adding: “Many of the secrets they know are explosive and would blow up much of the victim narrative so carefully crafted by those two. For example, some of these staff members were aware of commercial conversations that were going on when they were still full-time royals—they were clearing the way to make millions long before Megxit was revealed.”
At the time of their departure from the royal family, Harry and Meghan said they valued “the ability to earn a professional income, which in the current structure they are prohibited from doing. For this reason they have made the choice to become members of the Royal Family with financial independence.”
That the new threat of turbulence on this front should come from former employees is not, perhaps, entirely surprising.
The couple’s troubled relationship with their staff is well known. They experienced a high turnover of employees by royal standards, with several key aides and assistants quitting after only brief spells working for them. For instance, Meghan was said to be a demanding boss, sending staff emails as early as 5 a.m.
The pair were previously accused of bullying employees when they were working royals. The relationship with their staff deteriorated to the extent that their former righthand man, Jason Knauf, wrote a letter to his superiors complaining about Meghan’s behavior, saying: “I am very concerned that the duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household in the past year. The treatment of X was totally unacceptable.”
He added: “The duchess seems intent on always having someone in her sights. She is bullying Y and seeking to undermine her confidence.”
The letter was leaked to The Times just before the couple’s bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey. Harry and Meghan condemned the leak as a “smear.” A private inquiry by Buckingham Palace is taking place into the allegations.
It has been reported that at least 10 former employees have sought to give evidence to the investigation, which is being conducted by a team of external lawyers.
A spokesperson for the Sussexes did not respond to a request for comment.
Post time 29-7-2021 11:03 AMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
The sussex is scammers on charity.. isu utama mana mereka ada modal nak tubuhkan charity n furthermore both of them not working??? So called duit simpnan mereka x de pun smp 100juta pound pun.. lifestyle lavish even angie jolie yg berkerja pun boleh bankrupt kalo based on lifestyle mcm mereka ni.. seriously x de org audit foundation mereka ni ke??
yupp, sheols jadi sleeping beauty, pretending to be a victim, tapi sheols sebenarnya the killer. Her acting was so bad, not convincing as the victim and the killer. Smeg patut invest $$$ on taking acting classes, not hiring PR firm to craft her faux humanitarian image.
Post time 29-7-2021 02:00 AM
