Hudud Boleh Hakis Hak-Hak Wanita – Sister In Islam

cmf_acura

kah..kah..tak baca draf hudut lepas tu dok buat tafsir sendiri...lepas tu kata hudud zalim... membaca malas..   

lavanoteloo

gooooooooo sis goooooooo............... agreed no hooded in malaysia.

lavanoteloo

cmf_acura replied at 26-3-2015 11:16 PM
kah..kah..tak baca draf hudut lepas tu dok buat tafsir sendiri...lepas tu kata hudud zalim... membac ...

zalim ke tak zalim kalau kau nak hudud pergi pindah afghanistan , sudan ataupun some african country, sudan.

cmf_acura

binasalah orang yang memfitnah hudud...dan mwnyebabjan fitnah keatasnya....
nasihat aku..baca dulu...dqn jangan menjadi penyebab berlakunya fitnah keatas hukum hudud ini....mudahan allah bersama dengan orang yang ikhlas...

Maideen.

Anak_Nogori replied at 26-3-2015 09:29 PM
Tu kes rogol..bukan zina...patutnya kalau tak ada saksi..maka masuk takzir...bukan dibawah hudud.. ...

Maaf mencelah AN. Dalam soalan @elmen tadi ada dua kesalahan yang dilakukan . yang pertama ialah "hirabah" (yakni menyamun) dan merogol. Jika pon "rogol" tak termasuk dalam hudud ala PAS versi Kelantan, "hirabah" termasuk dalam hudud PAS itu.  Jika semasa melakukan hirabah itu mangsanya rompakan itu dibunoh, maka pesalah akan dihukum bunoh juga dan kemudiannya di salib. Jika tidak dibunoh, potong tangan!

Didalam hudud ala PAS, untuk memsabitkan kesalahan mustilah dengan keterangan lisan oleh saksi (yang layak i.e. lelaki, Isle dll) dan bukan pakai dna ka. Jumlah saksi bagi kesalahan hirabah pula ialah 2 orang. Ini bermakna, tidak seperti dimahkamah sivil, pendakwa tidak boleh membawa video ka, laporan doktor ka dsbnya. Mangsa juga tidak boleh memberi keterangan sebab dia tidak layak (yakni perempuan).

Seksyen 39(3) enekmen itu menyatakan keterangan mustilah berbentuk lisan dari saksi! Di dalam kes yang @elmen tanya, tidak ada saksi, jadi tanpa saksi, susahlah kesalahan "hirabah" itu dapat dibuktikan.

Tapi apa yang peliknya AN, Seksyen 47 Enekmen itu ada memperuntukan : " Apabila seseorang tertuduh itu tidak boleh dihukum dengan hukuman hudud kerana saksi saksi telah menarik bakik keterangan.......atau kerana keterangan yang ada tidak memenuhi syarat syarat yang dikehendaki untuk membuktikan kesalahan hudud maka tertuduh boleh lah dihukom dengan hukuman takzir...yang difikirkan patut oleh mahkamah..."

Ini bermakna, walaupon tertuduh tidak boleh disabitkan kesalahan (oleh kerana kekangan pembuktian yang mereka sundri kenakan), dia boleh juga dihukom....


Wallahualam.

lavanoteloo

Countries using strict forms of Sharia Law include:

Death for Blasphemy:

1. Afghanistan
2. Bahrain
3. Iran
4. Mauritania
5. Oman
6. Pakistan
7. Yemen
8. Saudi Arabia
9. Gaza

Imprisonment for Blasphemy:

1. Algeria
2. Bangladesh
3. Egypt
4. Iraq
5. Kuwait
6. Libya
7. Malaysia
8. Maldives
9. Morocco
10. Somalia
11. Tunisia
12. United Arab Emirates


Nations that include some level of Sharia (lenient sentences for honor killings, ban on new churches, floggings, etc):


1. Indonesia (Flogging, caning; Sharia applied strictly in Aceh province)
2. Turkey (Restrictions on alcohol)
3. Brunei (Caning; alcohol is illegal)
4. Jordan (2 years or less for honor killings)
5. Eritrea (Girls as young as 8 can be married; spousal rape is not recognized)
6. Syria (1 year or less for honor killings)
7. Djibouti (Sharia law regarding divorce)
8. Chechnya (Modest dress enforced; alcohol and gambling suppressed by local authorities)
9. Niger (girls can be married off before they reach puberty)
10. Nigeria (Sharia is enforced in the northern states)
11. Kenya (Ad hoc Sharia enforced in the east near the border with Somalia)
12. Gambia (Sharia courts decide all family matters, including for non-Muslims)
13. Qatar (public consumption is illegal during Ramadan; alcohol heavily restricted; blood money acceptable punishment for murder; "kafala" law, which is also shared by all Gulf states but Bahrain, is technically slavery)
14. Uganda (Kadhi Courts overseeing family and civil matters)

Most "Western" nations also have parallel Sharia legal systems (for example, in Canada polygamy is widely practiced and authorities look the other way; Imams refusing to condemn or work to stop it). Sharia finance is also practiced in many nations around the world. Many other Islamic nations that do not apply Sharia (such as Azerbaijan, Albania, Bosnia, Uzbekistan, and Tajikstan) have large portions of their population who do want it applied or who actively seek to abide by it extra-legally.

lavanoteloo

tentu ramai yang bercita cita nakan number 5 & 8

manjalara_01

FanTasyCreaTioN:   bg4.png Terimakasih yang bukak thread ni adik cuma nak lepak sini sambil bacer2 komen2 nantisuka bacer komen2 yang berilmiah tanpa carutan d ...

mmg menyakitkan mata & mencemarkan forum je....
mod....why not do something about those posts....?
delete je...kalau bleh....

cmf_acura

cuba laa bagi hujjah yg hudud menyebabkan..kezaliman ker....kemunduran ka....baru sedap sikit nak salahkan hudud...ni fakta tarak...baca malas...buat andaian sendiri....

cuba laa ambil kes yg hudud ni menyebabjan kezaliman....dengan ambil contoh di brunai...co tohnya...baru sedap sikit nak berhujjah...ni pun nak kena ajar kerr...

lavanoteloo

The Sharia is a Muslim text that is based upon the Sunnah, the Koran, the Ijma, and the Qiyas.
__________________________________________________________________


Sharia law is based on:
Quran, Muslims holy book revealed by God to prophet Muhammad (PBUH),
Sunnah, prophet Muhammad (PBUH) teachings (sayings and practices),
Qias, comparing with similar cases in Quran or Sunnah. For example, drugs are forbidden although not mentioned in Quran and Sunnah but because drug effects are the same when compared with alcohol (that is forbidden in Quran and sunnah explicitly), and
Ijmaa, issues where all Islam religion leaders agree upon.



Answer 1
Sharia law is based mainly on God holy book Quran and the prophet Sunnah (sayings and practices). Accordingly, no one can claim that he/she has the authority to claim that sharia law is subject to debates about pros and cons.

The only point is that the application of Sharia law needs good understanding and sound judgement.

Answer 2
While the divine nature and purpose of Shari'a Law may be beyond debate, the nature of those who claim to govern according to its principles can easily be debated. Shari'a-style governments tend to have certain general features that can be weighted and discussed. Such governments include the current governments of Iran and Saudi Arabia, the temporary governments of Al-Shabaab in Somalia and Ansar ed-Dine in north Mali, the former Taliban government in Afghanistan, and the recently elected government of Egypt.

Pros:
Islamic Unity: Shari'a Law tends to create the prospect of a new type of unity in states that are fractured by ethnic and tribal divides, a union through Islam. This helps to cement the idea of a united country.

Religious Principles Applied to Public Life: Those who support Shari'a government often do so because they believe that Liberal governments have a net result of removing religion from people (whether or not that is true is subject to debate). However, Shari'a governments often require the religious principles to be applied by law, such as the wearing of head-scarves, the banning of alcohol, and other such religious requirements which make it more common for people to be religious.

Cons:
Non-Muslim Discrimination: Nearly every government that implements Shari'a Law has an uptick in the amount of violence and repression against non-Muslims. Christian Churches in Egypt have been more frequently bombed, Sunni communities in Iran and Shiite communities in Saudi Arabia are actively prevented from praying as they would like. Jews are forbidden from living in Saudi Arabia in any long-term capacity and the Jews of Iran are forbidden from expressing any form of Zionism. Baha'i communities in Iran are actively discriminated against and attacked.

Criminalization of Apostasy and Homosexuality: Iran and Saudi Arabia both enforce strong punishments (such as 20 year prison sentences or executions) against those who are believed to be homosexuals and those who openly renounce Islam as their religion. The government in effect is punishing people for how they choose to associate and what they choose to believe. Additionally, many countries that implement some minimal form of Shari'a Law also have blasphemy laws that result in a vast limitation of both freedom and an excuse for people to settle petty grievances.

Authoritarianism: No Shari'a based society has fully accepted democracy or popular rule in anything but name. This comes from the idea that Shari'a leaders think that they are beyond reproach, save by God himself. As a result, they do not need to cater to different opinions held by other men.

Barbaric Punishments: Al-Shabaab, Ansar ed-Dine, and the Taliban were quite famous for hacking off limbs as punishments for thieving. Saudi Arabia has public stoning for adulterers.

GhostWalking

Depa musykil jadi apakata awok2 yang arif jawabkan instead of mengaum
...

Maideen.

ultra78 replied at 26-3-2015 07:25 PM
Nak jadi saksi, seseorang itu perlu dikira dosa & pahala. Boleh la tambah satu lagi jawatan awam. Pe ...

Jawatan tetap dan berpencen ka ni? Prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrpffffftght

GhostWalking

Kita pun syiok juge nak baca menambah ilmu.persoalan depa pun dah di highlightkan

lavanoteloo

Are there any similarities between Sharia Law and Judaism?

Answer 1Shariah law is similar to Judaic law as Mohammed copied from the Jews (at first he wanted to be the last Jewish prophet but was rejected by them). The difference is that the Jews have progressed beyond stoning and having more than one wife. Of course, there are idiosyncrasies of pre-Islamic culture within Islam that was not in Judaism, such as pilgrimage to Makkah.

Answer 2
Shariah law is similar to Jewish halacha in that both sets of laws are associated with religions. However, the laws, and application of those laws are radically different between the two religions.

As for the examples provided above, clarification must be provided. In the case of capital punishment, such a sentence can only be passed by the Sanhedrin according to Jewish law. Plus, the burden of proof required to sentence someone to death is so high according to Jewish law that it is almost impossible to set such a sentence. This is highlighted by the fact that a Sanhedrin that sentenced even one person to death in 70 years would have been noted for that one sentence.

In regard to multiple wives, the only reason as to why Jews do no have multiple wives is because secular law in most country does not allow this. In countries where polygamy is allowed, some Jews do choose to have multiple wives.

kentutmanis

Jakim dah fatwakan SIS sesat, lantakla pensaksian pompuan tu semue bwh tapak kasut, so bdosa tau lawan Jakim wakil tuhan ni, dosa pahala Jakim tentukan ok,halal haram makan minum Jakim jugak tentukan, lg satu fatwa gst pon kite kene patuh ye, jgn lawan kjaan nanti masuk nerake u..

jonedoe

mula2 kata hudud ni zalim - potong tgn la, rejam la, apa la. hukuman zalim gini tak sesuai utk negara kita la.

tapi bila tgk susahnya pulak nak lps piawaian jadi saksi, marah pulak. mintak bagi senang. mcm nak bagi senang je hukuman yg zalim tu dijatuhkan.

biar betul weh. nak bagi senang jatuh hukum hudud ka nak bagi susah?

manjalara_01

silap pulak..

jonedoe

manjalara_01 replied at 26-3-2015 04:19 PM
yea la manja pun x nampak kesalahannye kalau nak argue...tentang isu ni...
not really argue..mcm  ...

in the first place, utk bwk kesalahan di bwh hudud adalah consciously memilih pesalah itu akan dihukum dgn hukuman hudud - rejam sampai mati ka apa ka. kalau boleh bwk, cukup dgn syarat sabit kesalahan, maka bwklah utk org itu direjam.

tapi kalau tak cukup kriteria, maka pilihlah utk bwk kesalahan bwh ta'zir. pesalah jika sabit kesalahan masih dihukum, tapi tak kena rejam je la. tak puas hati ka kalu pesalah tu tak direjam?

jgn sewenang2 nak go for blood

manjalara_01

sorry....silap lagi...

CrowneGlory

Walau pun selalu SIS ni mcm x betul.. Tp this time adala betul gak apa yg dia ckp tu...