|
You need to pluck them out of the craters before you can 'sweep' them away.
Originally posted by belacan79 at 1-2-2009 08:43 PM
Why is it a head-ache ? They are equipment to simply sweep these away. And please there is a difference between runawau denial projectiles and simply dleayed fuse enlarged grenades. That is if the rockets are not shot down first. How difficult it is for highly manuevrable supersonic SAMs to shoot down dumb rockets ?
Can you name one war theatre where artillery shells and 慸umb rockets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hahaa. jangan harapla.
Originally posted by belacan79 at 1-2-2009 09:40 PM
Apasal Mig nak reitre tahun 2010 lak?
....
Dengan megunakan AWAC, Sg jet will always see first and shoot first.
AWACS can forget about seeing anything first. When the war starts they will be shot down first. I must say, your AWACS will turn out to be much bigger flying coffins than your Longbow Apache. LOLz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by belacan79 at 1-2-2009 10:27 PM
Ohh. im so scared. Using air to surface missiles to attack planes. By the way, Sg does not need to have all 4 AWACs in the air. Kh-31P can attack both surface and airborne targets.
I don抰 blame you. If I was a Singaporean I would be scared too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What kind of dumb question is this ?
Artilleries have wheels. They are all designed for mobility. Figure it out !
Originally posted by belacan79 at 1-2-2009 09:10 PM
You mean your Astross has the ability to teleport cam Star-wars yer? What is preparation time about? ....... And finding the sweet open clearing to shoot your Astross so that it can hit with relative accuracy;
And what is so difficult about finding a clear space to start firing ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by belacan79 at 1-2-2009 08:57 PM
You mean you know exactly where our mobile(continously on the move)and fxed radars are? Wow. Even i do not know. SG`s ground radars has a range of 400-450km. Add that to the Phalcon AWAC`s 400 km and it exceeds 800 km. Of course we will see first. Lagipun, you nak tembak aper sekarang? Runaway ke? Jalanraya ker? Radar ke?
Satellite earth stations don抰 have radars. And they are not mobile.
As for your radars, whether they are mobile or not, we will be able to destroy them all with anti radiation missiles once they are turned on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sejak bila pulak laporan oleh majalah persendirian tak boleh diterima ?
Kalau ikut 憄eraturan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tak betul la lobai. Kumpulan sukhoi paling akhir dah diterima oktobr lepas. Jadi ko boleh pikir sendirilah sama ada kita dah habis bayar atau belum.
Originally posted by belacan79 at 1-2-2009 09:40 PM
Sukhois pun lum habis hantar dan habeh bayar tul tak lobai? Ader bukti weapon untuk Cik su sudah dibeli?
Perajurit magazine August 2006 issue.
Even if there were no reports by them, it still doesn抰 take a brain surgeon to figure out that Malaysia would definitely acquire the most advanced version of Russian missiles when they placed the order for the sukhois.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by belacan79 at 1-2-2009 09:10 PM
And aircraft already armed with laser guided munitions and equipped with fantastic SAR capable radars(and linked to Phalcon AWACs and other assets) and targetting pods like Sniper pods can see, target and shoot in seconds. It takes a lot less time to kill these launchers.
As I said previously. No radars, infra red and laser can detect objects hidden beneath the Metrokoats camouflage and coatings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by belacan79 at 1-2-2009 09:57 PM
Ok buy F35 lor. No one`s stopping you. Tell me when it happens k.
Okay. No problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey botak..guess wut..im online today..muahahhah..ready for another round of logical responses as oppose to yours ahem warmomgering points. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quote]Im sorry to be the one telling you this, but AIM-120C-7 range is not more than 120km
while the C5 cannot go more than 105 km.
The F-15SG top speed is mach 2.5 while the sukhoi top speed is mach 2.35
But the 6.4% speed advantage the f-15 has over the sukhoi-30 is cancelled out by the 8.3% range advantage of the R-27AE over the AIM-120C-7.
That means the 憂o escape zone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quote]It takes over 2 years for Amraams to be delivered. Singaporean AMRAAM C7 order was placed in the middle of last year. That means for the next 18 months, Malaysia holds a huge advantage over them.
But don抰 get me wrong. Singapore will still become victims of our zombie shoot even after taking deliveries of AIM-120C-7 middle of next year. The only difference is that the 憐ombie shoot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by belacan79 at 2-2-2009 08:21 PM
Simple answer. You know SG has Amramm C5s and C7s. Does Malaysia has R-27A. Proof. It is not just about top speed and range of missile lobai. It`s also about detection capabilities, jamming, pilot training, etc. RSAF is the only air force with AWACs in the region and extensive array of ground radars that cover nearly all of West Malaysia. They can see you taking off long before you are in a position to do anything. They can jam you first. And shoot you first. Im sure you have some idea when your jets are jammed hard. Forget about using your missiles at long range.
Sorry la lobai .
AWACS flying coffins are just radars. Not jammers.
And you can forget about jamming Sukhoi radars with your fighters' ECMs.
Electronically scanning radars are highly resistant to jamming. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah. Those slow pathetic F-5s and Skyhawks will be first class cannon fodder for our long range R-27s.
Since only 128 Amraam C7 was ordered by Singapore, F-5s and A-4 s will only be carrying the C5 version because the F-15s and F-16s have first claim to the best missiles. That means the A-4s and F-5s will also become cannon fodder to our R-77s and AMRAAMs as well.
You mean you have 128 combat jets har? Tul ke?
The F-5s are not slow. Older models have a top speed of 1.6-1.7 mach. Newer and upgraded ones have better engines. Also, speed is actually a subset of what you carry. Tak tahu ker woii. The F-5s will be carrying lesser weapons. The Su-30s and Migs will carry more weapons. Also, the other advantageous thing is that the F-5 being smaller is very maneuverable as compared to bigger aircrafts. In addition, the F-5s has a lower RCS. You need to come closer for your radar to detect it as compared to the gigantic RCS of F15s and Su-30s. Most importantly, SG`s F5S/T can leverage on the AWACs. They will still see first and shoot first. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by belacan79 at 2-2-2009 08:24 PM
Are your Migs upgraded yet? and your hornets too?
I抦 not sure. But with the 18 sukhois armed with 130 km R-27s already around now, I think Malaysia should seriously think about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry la lobai .
AWACS flying coffins are just radars. Not jammers.
And you can forget about jamming Sukhoi radars with your fighters' ECMs.
Electronically scanning radars are highly resistant to jamming
Says who? Read up about it. Especially the Phalcon AESA. And hello...the F15SGs AESAs are better radars(you are using older PESAs); inclusive of high end Israel jammers. SG`s F16 clk 50/52 carry jamming equipment from Elisra. Eespecially SG`s F16 "spines". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I抦 not sure. But with the 18 sukhois armed with 130 km R-27s already around now, I think Malaysia should seriously think about it.
But you have no proof of the R-27 AE yet. What if i tell you SG has secretly bought Amraam 120-D with a range in excess of 165km-180km ? Dont know then dont say. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by belacan79 at 2-2-2009 08:32 PM
You mean you have 128 combat jets har? Tul ke?
No.
What i mean is
128 AMRAAM C7 is barely enough to equip 12 f-15s and 70+ f-16s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hundreds ?
Nah,
I doubt singapore has more than twenty stretches of roads that can be turned into runways.
So you dont know. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|