|
[Jenayah]
Sirul: Saya tak pernah mengaku bunuh Altantuya
[Copy link]
|
|
Judges defend decision not to call Musa in Altantuya case
January 27, 2015
KUALA LUMPUR: The five-member panel of judges ruled that Deputy Supt Musa Safri, a former aide de camp of prime minister Najib Razak, was not required to be called before the Federal Court simply because his testimony could not have helped in the defence of Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azhar Umar, both of whom were convicted of murdering Altantuya Shaariibuu.
According to Malaysiakini, in an 88-page judgement released recently, Justice Suriyadi Halim Omar, said, “It (Musa’s testimony) is only useful to Abdul Razak (Baginda). It merely confirmed evidence adduced from Altantuya Shaariibuu’s cousin and friend that he had had a relationship with the deceased.”
“We are therefore unable to see how much more details DSP Musa could produce that would contribute to the respondents’ defence. The calling of DSP Musa – let alone the tendering of the text messages – would not have affected the evidence pertaining to Abdul Razak’s relationship one tiny bit.”
Lawyer for Sirul, Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin, however said his client’s convictions opened “a can of worms” because of the many unanswered questions surrounding the murder.
He argued that despite the conviction, no motive had been established yet, and that evidence showed calls and text messages between Abdul Razak, Musa and Azilah three days prior to and on the night of the victim being killed.
“Who gave, and what were, the alleged instructions? Why was DSP Musa not called to testify?” Sirul’s lawyer has demanded.
He also pointed out that Abdul Razak’s affidavit during his bail proceedings resulted in his acquittal, with the court’s attention then been focussed on his client and Azilah instead.
Kamarul said Abdul Razak’s affidavit was never made available to the press by his lawyers except for a small portion that was revealed after his acquittal.
In arguing the conviction of Sirul and Azilah for the Mongolian’s murder in 2006, Justice Suriyadi maintained that the prosecutions’s case was based entirely on circumstantial evidence and that the evidence was strong.
He was referring to the call-logs of Azilah showing he had made a call from the crime scene thereby squashing his alibi altogether.
“By no account could Azilah have been at Bukit Aman or Wangsa Maju (the alleged alibi) at the material time.”
In the case of Sirul, Justice Suriyadi said, “His car that was detected at the Kota Damansara toll booth en route to Puncak Alam had totally discredited his unsworn testimony.”
He also said the court was satisfied by the circumstantial evidence presented and that the prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt, necessitating the restoration of the conviction of murder and the mandatory death sentence.
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com ... -in-altantuya-case/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cas2rie replied at 19-2-2015 10:29 PM
Biar betul dia nak dedahkan. Beraninya dia. Kalau betul seperti dakwaan sesetengah pihak berhubung o ...
Akak syak maksud sirul pasal bencana yg bakal menggugat keselamatan negara itu ialah Elohim bakal memberi bala gempa bumi maha dasyat dgn 20 skala richter di putrajaya
Barangkali sis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adakah mereka silap interpret arahan?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenapa sirul tak berani sebut nama? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siapa kata orang melayu x pandai putar belit....tapi kes Altantuya memang memalukan bangsa melayu dan negara malaysia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Napa sirul je yg bising2? Aritu ada 2org kan? Mana pergi sorg?
Adekah ni fireback dr kes nuar kalah lps lwn sepol yg disokong arituh?
Malaysia's politic scene is like a circus nowadays. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pertamanya, sirul dan azilah membunuh altantuya. Fact. Itu mmg takleh lepas. Walaupun pemberi arahan dan motif telah dikenalpasti (I.Allah suatu hari nanti), untuk tuduhan membunuh altantuya depa takkan boleh lepas..tetap kena hukuman..atas budi bicara hakim.
untuk tertuduh pemberi arahan, pdrm akan kena buka satu kertas siasatan then dakwa pulak kat mahkamah.
well, agak2 senang tak nak dakwa org yg terselindung tu nanti walaupun dah dapat dikenal pasti? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kat negara dunia ketiga, mundur, miskin takkan berlaku
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TERKINI: Kes Altantuya Shaaribuu ( Model Mongolia) Tajuk: Siapakah yang mengarahkan Cif Insp. Azilah Hadri, 38 dan Kop. Sirul Azhar, 43 untuk bunuh Altantuya. Sebelum Sirul mendedahkannya di Australia ramai rakyat Malaysia sudah pun mengetahuinya siapakah org misteri itu ? Ahkirnya maklumat bocor sebelum Sirul melarikan diri ke Australia beliau sempat menceritakan keadaan sebenar kepada Ibunya mengapa beliau melarikan diri ke Australia. Sirul memberitahu bahawa ms. ' y ' telah menggunakan kuasanya utk mengarahkan beliau dan rakannya Chif Inspektor Azilah utk membunuh Altantuya dan mayatnya haruslah diletopkan agar tidak dapat dikesan. Tujuan membunuh Altantuya bagi mengelakkan anak yg bakal dilahirkan tersebut hasil pengkongsian dgn mr. ' x ' Satu deal tertutup telah dibuat antara mr. ' x ' dgn Altantuya agar menggugurkan kandungan tersebut. Tetapi Altantuya terlalu sygkan bayi yg bakal dilahirkan nanti maka deal tersebut tidak berjaya dicapai. Malah Altantuya telah cuba diberikan wang sogokan sejumlah RM Juta ??? jika setuju menggugurkan bayi di dlm kandungannya. Malah gagal juga. Maka mr ' x ' menceritakan situasi sebenar kpd ms' y ' untuk beliau berpoligami secara senyap ( kahwin diam-diam) Tindakan mr ' x ' dikatakan tersilap langkah dan menempah maut maka ms ' y ' sgt marah dan tidak setuju lalu mengatakan bahawa Altantuya harus dibunuh dgn segera dan segala rekod masuknya di Malaysia yg terdapat di Jabatan Imigresan haruslah dihapuskan. Kita tunggu laporan penuh pendedahan sebenar Sirul Azhar kpd media di Australia. Siapakah mr ' x ' dan ms ' y ' yg dimaksudkan dlm cerita di atas like emoticon Harap maklum
Chif Inspektor Azilah telah melepaskan beberapa tembakan di kepala Altantuya manakala Kop. Sirul Azhar telah meletopkan mayat Altantuya dgn bom C4 pada tahun 2006.
Kes bunuh model Mongolia ini disiasat mengikut Seksyen 302 Kanun Keseksaan (Akta 574) yang membawa hukuman gantung sampai mati jika sabit kesalahan.. Manakala Mahkamah Persekutuan telah mengekalkan hukuman mati kepada Sirul & Azilah memenglah dia tak bunuh tapi tukang letup mayat jer eh yeker ..entahlah sandiwara
smile emoticon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kalau diarah pun takkan tak boleh beza mana buruk mana baik...
Arahan sampai nak letupkan manusia sesuatu yg tak boleh diterima akal pakcik sirul oii... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodo punye macai...
smpi kes nie pun nk kaitkan kes sayfool Nuar...
mana boleh azilah & sirul kena dulu...
dakwa juga sapa yg arah...
klu sabit gantung...
gantung sume...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
belilies replied at 20-2-2015 09:34 AM
Napa sirul je yg bising2? Aritu ada 2org kan? Mana pergi sorg?
Adekah ni fireback dr kes nuar kal ...
Ada macai ckp..sirul tak nak buka mulut takut anak bini jd mangsa..so..dia sanggup ke tali gantung tanpa buka mulut.
Tapi lani buka mulut...tanpa sebut nama..anak sedara saya pun boleh ckp.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kambeng_masam replied at 20-2-2015 09:41 AM
pertamanya, sirul dan azilah membunuh altantuya. Fact. Itu mmg takleh lepas. Walaupun pemberi arahan ...
Polis nak buka siasatan semula berdasarkan apa beng?.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cerita ceriti tanpa bukti . Berbagai tiori dan spekulasi tapi tak sampai kemana pun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cerita belum habis lagi kan? kalau dalam muvi tu kira belum klimaks lagi lah ...misteri masih tak terungkap. Andaikata KPN beri lampu hijau (maybe dah taubat ke apa)...tanpa sebarang bukti baru pun buleh buka siasatan semula siasat balik barang2 bukti yg tersedia ada..then pi siasat balik yg terlibat bagai...cuma bergantung atas pendakwaraya la pulak kan nak dakwa yg tertuduh tu ke tidak nanti. Anehnya, hakim kata tak perlu panggil musa safree..sedangkan ini kes bunuh...high profile...buleh busuk nama negara, apa tak bolehnya panggil juga memana saksi yg ebrkaitan secara langsung atau tidak? sedangkan tilam busuk berlendir boleh dibawa ke mahkamah. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
akusukaq replied at 20-2-2015 10:11 AM
Cerita ceriti tanpa bukti . Berbagai tiori dan spekulasi tapi tak sampai kemana pun.
Opkos sirul nak lepaskan tengkoknya..memang mengarut... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dalam negara malaysia boleh, semua boleh....
pembunuh boleh bunuh tanpa motif....polis pun tak minat nak tahu apa motif....hakim pun tak minat nak tahu apa motif...
motif tak perlu, kata mereka.....
lain kali, kalau nak membunuh, boleh lah guna pembunuh upahan je, kalau kena tangkap pun, pembunuh upahan je yang kena tangkap...
hanya di malaya... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kambeng_masam replied at 20-2-2015 10:17 AM
cerita belum habis lagi kan? kalau dalam muvi tu kira belum klimaks lagi lah ...misteri masih ...
Citer memang tak boleh habis..kalau nak buat bersiri2 pun boleh...fantasi ke, true stori ke, speku ke?..tengok selera penonton lah..kalau buat movie true stori bersiri2..tapi penonton tak mahu byr dan tengok..kes close lah..tapi kalau fantasi speku tu menarik org ramai nak tengok...cerita bodoh pun siri tu boleh sampai siri 100. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
korang tgk, macai punya komen
rakyat nak bela nasib yg kena bunuh dgn kejam... achai2 pegi cover lak... pelik |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anak_Nogori replied at 20-2-2015 02:01 AM
Ada macai ckp..sirul tak nak buka mulut takut anak bini jd mangsa..so..dia sanggup ke tali gantung ...
Ooo.. Skrg ni anak bini kat mana yg dia brani nak dedah ni? Derang masih kat msia lg kan? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|