|
|
[INFO]MANUSIA TIDAK PERNAH MENDARAT DI BULAN
[Copy link]
|
|
|
aku tak kisah pun kalau manusia x pernah mendarat di bulan..tapi sumbangan NASA teramatlah banyak pada manusia sekelian alam bumi nih..bukan setakat penerokaan space sahaja tapi dari segi teknologi..
THANK YOU NASA!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cik_ainol posted on 22-11-2013 03:50 PM 
saya pun tak caya manusia pernah ke bulan, kalau pernah kenapa tidak ada lagi misi ke bulan berkali ...
Apollo 8 - circumlunar flight - 21 Disember 1968
Apollo 10 - lunar low orbit - 18 Mei 1969
Apollo 11 - 1st moon landing - 21 Julai 1969
Apollo 12 - 2nd moon landing - 18 November 1969
Apollo 13 - circumlunar flight - 11 April 1970
Apollo 14 - 3rd moon landing - 31 Januari 1971
Apollo 15 - 4th moon landing - 26 Julai 1971
Apollo 16 - 5th moon landing - 16 April 1972
Apollo 17 - last moon landing - 7 Disember 1972
bukan sekali aje ye.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nhuser posted on 27-11-2013 11:32 PM
Tak kisahlah, sekarang mrk dah teroka angkasa yg lebih jauh dari bulan.... Kita? Harap2 akan lahir p ...
Dr Mazlan, pengarah agensi apekebenda tah tu pakar angkasa le...pakar angkasa tak semestinya angkasawan
logik angkasawan mampu keluar dari bumi hanya dgn baju yg senipis itu?
Angkasawan dah berkali2 buat EVA (extra vehicular activity) kat angkasa lepas (walaupun cuma 350km dari permukaan bumi, atmosfera dah tak ada dan mereka terdedah kepada radiasi) tak sorang pun kiok akibat radiasi?
Last edited by alphawolf on 28-11-2013 01:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cuma masa cold war tu dia menang la dengan hoax ni sbb russian percaya....
Kalau Soviet Union percaya maka mmg mangkuk hayun le agensi angkasa deme masa tu....kalau amerika buat hoax, itu la can Soviet kasi malu amerika be... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st moon landing (mungkin) hoax tapi landing2 seterusnya? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kalau dah tak caya tu tak caya la jugak kan, walaupun bukti dah jelas....tapi takpe meh aku tolong mana yang boleh
1 – Kenapa bendera Amerika Syarikat yang dipacakkan ke bulan berkibar? Jika di permukaan bulan tidak ada oksigen dan udara, dengan kata lain suasana hampagas, bendera itu tidak sepatutnya berkibar. Memang NASA telah meletakkan satu batang paip horizontal pada bendera tersebut, tetapi tidak diletakkan kipas angin untuk membuatkannya berkibaran dan bergoyang-goyang. Jika hanya diletakkan batang paip, maka sepatutnya bendera itu hanya tegak diam-diam, bukan menari-nari seperti ditiup angin.
Bila tiada udara, maka geseran makin berkurang, 'kibaran' tu bukan kibaran tapi 'memori lipatan' ain bendera....ada gambar Buzz Aldrin beri tabik dan turunkan tangan depan bendera tu, kedua2nya menunjukkan renyuk bendera adalah sama
2 – Tidak ada kesan hentaman jet modul pendaratan pada permukaan bulan. Sepatutnya ada kesan berlepas dan tapak-tapak kaki angkasawan berdekatannya akan terhapus. Tetapi tapak-tapak kaki di situ masih wujud.
Ni teknikal sikit, nak explain pun tak reti sangat
]3 – Tapak kaki angkasawan tersangat jelas. Sedangkan graviti di bulan tidak kuat. Permukaannya tidak lembab. Tetapi kesan tapak kaki tersebut seolah-seolah permukaan di situ lembab dan tarikan gravitinya kuat. Debu-debu di permukaan bulan dikatakan sangat nipis, tetapi mengapa masih wujud kesan tapak kaki yang dalam dan jelas.
Pasir di bulan lain banding di bumi akibat tiada proses luluhawa...dan siapa yang kata debu nipis? Tapak kaki nampak jelas sebab tarikan graviti lebih kuat (sebab di bumi) dan sebab basah? Cuba tengok jejak kaki kita kat tanah atau pasir bumi, nampak lagi kabur banding tapak kaki kat bulan kan? Tu kat tempat yang graviti dia kuat tu....
4 – Pergerakan para angkasawan di bulan jika dilajukan filemnya sedikit akan menunjukkan pergerakan yang sama jika mereka di bumi. Bermakna filem yang merakamkan pergerakan-pergerakan mereka itu kemungkinan besar telah di gambar gerak perlahankan (slow motion).
Dalam Mythbusters sendiri dah tunjuk yang pergerakan angkasawan di bulan nampak lain banding pergerakan bawah pengaruh graviti bumi....
5 – Batu-batu yang dibawa pulang adalah serupa dengan batu-batu yang dikumpul pada ekspedisi saintifik ke Antartika. Kemungkinan batu-batu itu adalah meteor-meteor yang jatuh ke bumi.
Pakar soviet sendiri dah sahkan batu2 tu dari bulan
6 – Bayang-bayang yang wujud pada subjek-subjek di permukaan bulan seperti yang dirakam oleh NASA kadang-kadang tidak menepati yang sepatutnya berlaku. Contohnya, arah muncul bayang tidak kena dengan arah cahaya matahari. Lagi pun angle kamera yang diambil bukan matahari membelakangi jurugambar. Jika matahari membelakangi jurugambar, logik lah bayang dilihat menuju arah yang berlainan sedikit, kerana perspektif jurugambar dari bayang tersebut.
Teknikal sikit...malas nak explain
7 – Seolah-seolah digunakan tali lutsinar dari atas disangkut pada angkasawan-angkasawan itu yang kadangkala dapat kelihatan dalam video rakaman NASA.
Ni yang paling best, mereka yang kata ada konspirasi konspirasi pun tak timbulkan hal ni!
8 – Kesemua 6 kali pendaratan manusia di bulan dilakukan pada masa pemerintahan Presiden Nixon, dan tidak ada satu pun selepas zamannya hinggalah sekarang. Zaman dulu mudah untuk menipu dan memainkan pemikiran orang, tetapi cuba buat zaman sekarang. Silakan NASA hantar seorang ke bulan sekarang kalau dapat, sedangkan teknologi sekarang jauh lebih maju.
Zaman tu kalau nak menipu lagi payah, buat apa susah2 nak menipu. Fokus pun dah berubah. Bila Presiden bertukar2, dasar dan polisi pun bertukar2
9 – Suasana langit ketika di permukaan bulan adalah hitam gelap pekat. Tetapi kenapa sampai langsung tidak nampak bintang di langit? Sedangkan atmosferanya bukan macam bumi, yang ketika matahari memancar terik di atas langit jadi biru. Tetapi alasan aperture kamera dan setting-settingnya untuk mengelakkan over expose mungkin munasabah.
Langit bumi biru sebab ada atmosfera. Bulan takde (atau terlalu nipis) sebab tu hitam. Takyah bulan, Kalau terbang lebih 80,000 kaki, langit dah hitam dah. Pasal bintang tu, gambar diambil waktu siang...siang nampak bintang ke?
10 – Perekabentuk kamera untuk misi ke bulan itu iaitu Jan Lundberg juga mengakui hairan melihat keadaan gambar-gambar yang diambil oleh angkasawan. Dengan hanya cahaya bersumber dari matahari, tanpa flash kamera, mustahil wujud pencahayaan seperti yang dirakamkan. Dengan beberapa bayang-bayang wujud ditempat yang salah. Dan bagaimana kamera yang disangkut ke dada angkasawan itu, boleh merakam gambar-gambar yang jelas dan kemas, sepertimana diambil oleh jurugambar professional.
Gambar buruk sah2 ada tapi takkan gambar tak cun nak tunjuk kan orang ye tak? Dan satu lagi, ni mesti korang yang percaya hoax ni seronok...ada gambar2 tu dah di ubahsuai (sebab nak kasi nampak lagi cun)
Gini la, kerajaan US tak dapat nak sorok skandal Watergate yang libatkan cuma berpuluh-puluh orang sampai Nixon kena letak jawatan. Inikan pula penipuan yang melibatkan beratus malah mungkin ribuan orang dalam NASA sahaja, tu tak campur tentera ke, agensi awam lain, kontraktor, studio filem (kalau hoax la) tukang cuci, tukang sapu.....
Dan satu lagi, benda pun dah lebih 40 tahun dah...cuba2 le buat konspirasi baru, kata pendaratan Sojourner, Curiosity dan sebagainya kat Marikh tu konspirasi ajer..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alphawolf posted on 28-11-2013 02:35 PM
Kalau dah tak caya tu tak caya la jugak kan, walaupun bukti dah jelas....tapi takpe meh aku tolong m ...
no 8 tu banyak org persoalkan...sedangkan soviet sendiri pun xnk hantar orang ke bulan sbb hantar ke bulan will prove nothing...dah ada org achieve..so dia aim kat yg lebih tinggi....sedangkan dua2 negara berlumba2 nak tunjukkan siapa lebuh hebat...dan menghantar angkasawan ke bulan xkan membuktikan dia lebih hebat pun...so why do it??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tak dak nak percaya la orang amerika yg first landing di bulan....PROPAGANDA je tuh.....
setahu mek ler...AYAH PIN jer yang pernah sampai ke bulan....
awwwww...nyah oiiiiiiii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eleh, g ke bulan nak bising...malaysia nak ke matahari...tp time malam la...hehe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dah2 lah pihak soviet dan usa dah tak boleh pi bulan lagi...'Kami' dah duduk di bulan lama sblm manusia bumi dtg..earthlings sudah dilarang mendarat ke bulan... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alphawolf posted on 28-11-2013 01:42 PM
Dr Mazlan, pengarah agensi apekebenda tah tu pakar angkasa le...pakar angkasa tak semestinya angka ...
dan utk informative anda lagi...
di ruang angkasa bumi ada dua satelit yg ada angkasawan tinggal. satu dari amerika dan satu dari russia.
mereka tinggal di stesen angkasa lepas utk buat kajian.
yg kita selalu baca ttg NASA, selain NASA, byk lagi agensi angkasa negara lain buat penerokaan cuma kita tak didedahkan sbb tak masuk exam...
org islam merupakan cendekiawan angkasa lepas yg paling ulung skali.
saintis dan pengkaji angkasa lepas buat kajian berdasarkan kajian cendekiawan islam,
yg tahu bumi ni sfera, yg tahu bumi ada graviti, bumi berputar pada orbit, bumi berputar pada kelajuan berapa,
ada sistem solar, ada matahari bulan dan bintang
sumer nya dah diceritakan dalam al Quran. so NASA cedok je dan claim dorg buat kajian.
waku peristiwa israk dan mikraj, ramai tak percaya rasulullah boleh bergerak ke banyak tempat dlm satu mlm,
tp skg bila nasa kata boleh guna kelajuan cahaya percaya plak.... abis tu nabi guna kelajuan apa?
nabi sulaiman juga dikurniakan mukjizat mengawal alam sekitar seperti angin, udara, hujan, so sapa lagi hebat kita ke dorg....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rasulullah pernah ke bulan ke?
Rasulullah belah bulan dan cantumkan balik pernah ler,
dan ketika NASA amik gambar pakai robot dia, mmg di tgh2 bulan ada parit dalam seoalh2 bulan pernah di kerat dua. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NBM posted on 22-11-2013 11:40 AM
betul tu..lagi satu bulan kan bercahaya, walaupun xlah sepower matahari, dah tentu ianya panas kan ...
bulan tidak bercahaya.. cahaya yg kita lihat pantulan dr cahaya matahari kn.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ada pernah terbaca yang kemungkinan no more ekspedisi ke bulan sebab mereka jumpa DNA makhluk asing dlm bahan2 yg depa ambil dan kaji dari bulan... teori saja... x tahu betul ke x.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ummukender posted on 29-11-2013 03:11 PM
bulan tidak bercahaya.. cahaya yg kita lihat pantulan dr cahaya matahari kn..
cahaya bulan adalah hasil dari penyerapan cahaya dari pantulan sinar matahari. Tu yg aku belajar dulu laa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sebab tak pegi bulan lagi.
- Kos (1.8B sekali pegi).
- Matlamat.
- Birokrasi politik. (dulu sebab nak belumbe sape jadi no 1)
- Jepun, China, India dah buat unmanned program ke bulan.
- Banyak dah ade gambar2 bulan baru... kalo nak kate potoshop gak memang tak leh nak buat ape la...
Tapi sebab (1) + (3) jadi masalah sampai harini... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sumer soalan2 kat page 1 tu bleh dijawab kalo google. NASA pun ade jawab... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aku dah lama tak ikut perkembangan moon landings hoax ni...
yang jelas, point2 yang diberikan oleh para doubters ni memang berasas ... penjelasan Nasa permulaannya hanyalah pada level teori yang tidak akan 100% menolak hujah2 yang timbul dari keraguan tentang pendaratan di bulan 1969 itu.. sebab itu ianya masih wujud pada masa sekarang walaupun pengaruhnya tak sekuat dulu.. sebahagiannya kerana penjelasan nasa ini boleh dibalas balik, sebahagiannya disebabkan kerana tak update tentang isu ini, sebahagiannya kerana lebih suka memiliih dipihak doubters kerana reason tertentu, etc...
sebab itu ramai para doubters ini mahukan bukti konkrit iaitu bukti tinggalan mission dahulu melalui mission era zaman ini...
jika dapat dibuktikan semua tinggalan itu masih ada, maka semua hujah doubters ini hanyalah pada level teknikal, yang apa pun tafsirannya sudah tidak relevan...
ini artikel akhir tahun lepas...
10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax
The theory that the moon landings were hoaxed by the US government to assert their victory in the space race over Russia, is something which has grown in popularity over time.
Recent polls indicate that approximately 20% of Americans believe that the U.S. has never landed on the moon. After the Apollo missions ended in the seventies, why haven’t we ever been back? Only during the term of Richard Nixon did humanity ever land on the moon, and after Watergate most people wouldn’t put it past Tricky Dick to fake them to put America in good standing in the Cold War.
In this list I have presented some of the proposed evidence to suggest that the moon landings were hoaxes. I tried to include NASA’s explanations to each entry to provide an objective perspective.

10The Waving Flag
Bendera berkibar?
Conspiracy theorists have pointed out that when the first moon landing was shown on live television, viewers could clearly see the American flag waving and fluttering as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin planted it. Photos of the landing also seem to show rippling in a breeze, such as the image above which clearly shows a fold in the flag. The obvious problem here is that there’s no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and therefore no wind to cause the flag to blow.
Countless explanations have been put forward to disprove this phenomenon as anything unusual: NASA claimed that the flag was stored in a thin tube and the rippled effect was caused by it being unfurled before being planted. Other explanations involve the ripples caused by the reaction force of the astronauts touching the aluminum pole, which is shown to shake in the video footage.


9
Lack of Impact Crater
Kesan lekukan dibawah kapal angkasa sepatutnya ada..
The claim goes as follows: had NASA really landed us on the moon, there would be a blast crater underneath the lunar module to mark its landing. On any video footage or photograph of the landings, no crater is visible, almost as though the module was simply placed there. The surface of the moon is covered in fine lunar dust, and even this doesn’t seem to have been displaced in photographic evidence.
Much like the waving flag theory, however, the lack of an impact crater has a slew of potential explanations. NASA maintains that the module required significantly less thrust in the low-gravity conditions than it would have done on Earth. The surface of the moon itself is solid rock, so a blast crater probably wouldn’t be feasible anyway – in the same way that an aeroplane doesn’t leave a crater when it touches down on a concrete airstrip.


8Multiple Light Sources
Lebih dari satu sumber cahaya? kerana bayang2 tidak tida selari..
On the moon there is only one strong light source: the Sun. So it’s fair to suggest that all shadows should run parallel to one another. But this was not the case during the moon landing: videos and photographs clearly show that shadows fall in different directions. Conspiracy theorists suggest that this must mean multiple light sources are present -suggesting that the landing photos were taken on a film set.
NASA has attempted to blame uneven landscape on the strange shadows, with subtle bumps and hills on the moon’s surface causing the discrepancies. This explanation has been tossed out the window by some theorists; how could hills cause such large angular differences? In the image above the lunar module’s shadow clearly contradicts that of the rocks in the foreground at almost a 45 degree angle.


7The Van Allen Radiation Belt
Radiasi Allen yang sepatutnya bahaya kepada manusia
In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place. The Apollo missions to the moon marked the first ever attempts to transport living humans through the belt. Conspiracy theorists contend that the sheer levels of radiation would have cooked the astronauts en route to the moon, despite the layers of aluminum coating the interior and exterior of the spaceship.
NASA have countered this argument by emphasizing the short amount of time it took the astronauts to traverse the belt – meaning they received only very small doses of radiation.


6The Unexplained Object
Terdapat objek misteri yang tidak dapat dijelaskan
After photographs of the moon landings were released, theorists were quick to notice a mysterious object (shown above) in the reflection of an astronaut’s helmet from the Apollo 12 mission. The object appears to be hanging from a rope or wire and has no reason to be there at all, leading some to suggest it is an overhead spotlight typically found in film studios.
The resemblance is questionable, given the poor quality of the photograph, but the mystery remains as to why something is being suspended in mid-air (or rather lack of air) on the moon. The lunar module in other photos appears to have no extension from it that matches the photo, so the object still remains totally unexplained.
5Slow-Motion Walking and Hidden Cables
Kesan berjalan dalam graviti rendah boleh dibuat dstudio dengan bantuan tali
In order to support claims that the moon landings were shot in a studio, conspiracy theorists had to account for the apparent low-gravity conditions, which must have been mimicked by NASA. It has been suggested that if you take the moon landing footage and increase the speed of the film x2.5, the astronauts appear to be moving in Earth’s gravity. As for the astronaut’s impressive jump height, which would be impossible to perform in Earth’s gravity, hidden cables and wires have been suggested as giving the astronauts some extra height. In some screenshots outlines of alleged hidden cables can be seen (the photograph above supposedly shows a wire, though it is extremely vague).


4Lack of Stars
Tiada bintang pada gambar2 dibulan
One compelling argument for the moon landing hoax is the total lack of stars in any of the photographic/video evidence. There are no clouds on the moon, so stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter than what we see through the filter of Earth’s atmosphere.
The argument here is that NASA would have found it impossible to map out the exact locations of all stars for the hoax without being rumbled, and therefore left them out – intentionally falling back on an excuse that the quality of the photographs washes them out (an excuse they did actually give).
Some photographs are high-quality, however, and yet still no stars are shown. Certainly eerie, considering you can take pictures of stars from Earth in much lower quality and still see them.


3The “C” Rock
Terdapat huruf C pada salah satu batu di bulan
One of the most famous photos from the moon landings shows a rock in the foreground, with what appears to be the letter “C” engraved into it. The letter appears to be almost perfectly symmetrical, meaning it is unlikely to be a natural occurrence. It has been suggested that the rock is simply a prop, with the “C” used as a marker by an alleged film crew. A set designer could have turned the rock the wrong way, accidentally exposing the marking to the camera.
NASA has given conflicting excuses for the letter, on the one hand blaming a photographic developer for adding the letter as a practical joke, while on the other hand saying that it may simply have been a stray hair which got tangled up somewhere in the developing process.


2The Layered Cross-hairs
Tanda pangkah yang berada dibelakang objek. Tanda + ini sepatutnya ada didepan kerana ini feature kamera
The cameras used by astronauts during the moon landings had a multitude of cross-hairs to aid with scaling and direction. These are imprinted over the top of all photographs. Some of the images, however, clearly show the cross-hairs behind objects in the scene, implying that photographs may have been edited or doctored after being taken. The photograph shown above is not an isolated occurrence. Many objects are shown to be in front of the cross-hairs, including the American flag in one picture and the lunar rover in another.
Conspiracy theorists have suggested NASA printed the man-made objects over a legitimate photograph of the moon to hoax the landings – although if they really planned on doing this, then why they used cross-hairs in the first place is a mystery.


1The Duplicate Backdrop

Gambar landskap yang diambil pada dua tempat berlainan yang berbatu jauhnya adalah sama, match
The two photos from the Apollo 15 mission shown above clearly have identical backdrops, despite being officially listed by NASA as having been taken miles apart. One photo even shows the lunar module. When all photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how can it possibly be there for one photo and disappear in another? Well, if you’re a hardcore conspiracy theorist, it may seem viable that NASA simply used the same backdrop when filming different scenes of their moon landing videos.
NASA has suggested that since the moon is much smaller than Earth, horizons can appear significantly closer to the human eye. Despite this, to say that the two hills visible in the photographs are miles apart is incontrovertibly false.


BonusThe Stanley Kubrick Theory
Gosip Stanley Kubrick yang mungkin bantu amerika buat filem moon landing ni
This loose extension of the popular conspiracy theory states that acclaimed film director Stanley Kubrick was approached by the US government to hoax the first three moon landings. There are two main branches of this somewhat implausible theory: one group of believers maintain that Kubrick was approached after he released 2001: A Space Odyssey (released in 1968, one year before the first moon landing), after NASA came to appreciate the stunning realism of the film’s outer-space scenes at that time; another group contends that Kubrick was groomed by the government to film the moon landing long before this, and that 2001: A Space Odyssey was a staged practice run for him.
So what evidence might support such claims? Well: apparently, if you watch The Shining (another Kubrick picture), you can pick up on some alleged messages hidden by Kubrick to subtly inform the world of his part in the conspiracy. The most obvious is the child’s Apollo 11 shirt worn in only one scene. Another supposed gem is the line written on Jack Nicholson’s character’s typewriter: “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy”, in which the word “all” can be interpreted as A11, or Apollo 11.
If you aren’t convinced yet, Kubrick made the mysterious hotel room in the film number 237. Guess how many miles it is from here to the moon: 238,000. So divide that by a thousand and minus one, and you’ve got one airtight theory right there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sudah ada beberapa third party yang dapat memberikan 'bukti' yang memang berlaku pendaratan dibulan pada 1969, walaupun bukti ini tidaklah memuaskan hati semua pihak kerana gambar hanya dapat diambil dari jauh..
imej landskap yang dibina semula dari selene, kapal angkasa jepun, itu memberi hasil yang sama dengan gambar yang diambil oleh apollo 15
dalam kes kapal angkasa india itu chandrayaan 1 ramai yang memberi hujah, warna yang berbeza ditempat pendaratan apollo 15 dengan sekitarnya adalah bukti bahawa pendaratan dibulan pada 1969 itu benar..
Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings
In this section are only those observations that are completely independent of NASA—no NASA facilities were used, and there was no NASA funding.
Each of the countries mentioned in this section (Soviet Union, Japan, China, and India) has its own space program, builds its own space probes which are launched on their own launch vehicles, and has its own deep space communication network.
SELENE photographsIn 2008, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings.[1] On the left are two photos taken on the lunar surface by Apollo 15 astronauts in July or August 1971. On the right is a 2008 reconstruction from images taken by the SELENE terrain camera and 3D projected to the same vantage point as the surface photos. The terrain is a close match within the SELENE camera resolution of 10 metres.
Selene dari jepun, ini hanya mampu ambil gambar dari dari jauh dan hanya perbandingan bentuk landskap dapat dibuat.
Gambar yang ketiga diambil oleh selene ini konsisten dengan bentuk landskap yang diambil oleh apollo 15.
The light-coloured area of blown lunar surface dust created by the lunar module engine blast at the Apollo 15 landing site was photographed and confirmed by comparative analysis of photographs in May 2008. They correspond well to photographs taken from the Apollo 15 Command/Service Module showing a change in surface reflectivity due to the plume. This was the first visible trace of manned landings on the Moon seen from space since the close of the Apollo program.
Chandrayaan-1
Chandraaan probe indian ini hanya dapat bagi gambar yang jauh, hanya ada tompokan kecil pada gambar dimana ada pendaratan dilakukan.
As with SELENE, the Terrain Mapping Camera of India's Chandrayaan-1 probe did not have enough resolution to record Apollo hardware.
Nevertheless, as with SELENE, Chandrayaan-1 independently recorded evidence of lighter, disturbed soil around the Apollo 15 site.[2][3]
Chang'e 2China's second lunar probe, Chang'e 2, which was launched in 2010 is capable of capturing lunar surface images with a resolution of up to 1.3 metres. It claims to have spotted traces of the Apollo landings, though the relevant imagery has not been publicly identified.[4]
Last edited by ninja9 on 30-11-2013 02:31 PM
|
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASA releases stunning new moon-landing snaps No, not taken at a secret Hollywood film studio By Rik Myslewski, 6th September 2011
NASA has released a series of photos of Apollo moon-landing sites that are dramatically improved over previous photos taken as recently as 2009.The photos were taken by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), which was launched on June 18, 2009 aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket, along with the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS).
The landing sites in the new photos included those of the second manned moon landing, Apollo 12 of November 1969; the third, Apollo 14 of January 1971 (all Tom Hanks fans know what happed to Apollo 13); and the final visit of man to the moon, Apollo 17 of December 1972 – nearly 39 years ago.
The photos made in 2009 were also captured by the LRO, but at its standard altitude of 50 kilometers (31 miles). For the new series, its elliptical orbit was adjusted so that it dipped as low as 21 kilometers (13 miles).
The landing site of the Apollo 17 mission, as photographed in 2009
The landing site of the Apollo 17 mission, as photographed in 2011 (click to enlarge)
"Without changing the average altitude, we made the orbit more elliptical, so the lowest part of the orbit is on the sunlit side of the Moon," said deputy LRO project scientist John Keller in a NASA release. "This put LRO in a perfect position to take these new pictures of the surface."
The new images clearly show the lunar landing modules for each mission, plus the instrument cluster known as the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), variations of which came along on each mission.
The landing site of the Apollo 12 mission, as photographed in 2009
The landing site of the Apollo 12 mission, as photographed in 2011 (click to enlarge)
Also clearly visible in the new images are the astronauts tracks in the lunar dust. The Apollo 17 images also show tracks of the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) – more affectionately known as the "moon buggy", along with its final resting place.
One striking detail in the Apollo 12 image is a pair of lines radiating out from the ALSEP at a right angle. These are cables leading to two of the ALSEP's instruments, brightly lit by the reflection of the sun.
Another detail in the Apollo 12 image: astronauts' footprints leading to the unmanned Surveyor 3 spacecraft, which had landed on the moon in April of 1967, and which the Apollo 12 astronauts photographed during their visit.
Dengan gambar2 dari mission LRO ini sangat susah untuk mengatakan bahawa pendaratan dibulan itu adalah hoax. Adakah Nasa akan terus2an menipu seluruh umat manusia pada masa banyak negara didunia sekarang maju dalam penerokaan angkasa. Lambat laun pasti akan kantoi juga dan kesalahan yang ditanggung Nasa lebih besar. Walaupun begitu, mungkin masih ramai yang tidak yakin dengan perkembangan terbaru ini. Tepuk dada tanya selera...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 28-11-2013 12:23 PM
Author
