CariDotMy

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

Author: tumpanglalu74

Petra Tak Paham Laporan Pusrawi - Doctors Invited

[Copy link]
Post time 2-8-2008 10:48 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by peYno at 2-8-2008 10:34 AM

dan paling kelakau bila Dr tu suruh refer ke HKL.. dia kata... ha tu la buktinya Sepol sebenarnya mmg diliwat


sebab dia akan kecewa klu sepol tak kena liwat.
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 2-8-2008 10:53 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by tobby at 2-8-2008 10:37 AM


TRO tu maksudnya Tidak Kena Liwat.

tu la peguam UMNO... tgk level peguam negara tu pon kita dah boleh tahu
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 10:55 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by DTECCONAN at 1-8-2008 11:56 PM
nama jer lawyer, tapi BODOH rupa2nya

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/4420/pusrawi2mc8.jpg

saja jer tempek, KHAS untuk peguam Maideen. yg BANGANG

sebab dia loyar umno la dia bodoh... kalau loyar bukan umno mmg bijak2..
biasala jadi loyer sebab atas dasar melayu je...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 10:56 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by DTECCONAN at 2-8-2008 10:34 AM
kalau ikut peguam Maideen. cabuk, plastik tu akan dipenjara 20 tahun

satu je kita kena ingat
kalau PEGUAM NEGARA pon jenis bodoh dan tak bijak
apa la yg kita boleh harap dgn PEGUAM KANGKUNG nii
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 10:57 AM | Show all posts
mendap..............
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 10:57 AM | Show all posts
up........................
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 2-8-2008 10:57 AM | Show all posts
mendap lagi
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 10:59 AM | Show all posts

Reply #301 peYno's post

agak2nya kes apa yg peguam cabuk ni menang kes? ker takder satu kes pon menang semua kalah
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 2-8-2008 11:01 AM | Show all posts
adakah peguam cabuk C.I akan turut menjadi peguam Sepol?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:01 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by DTECCONAN at 2-8-2008 10:59 AM
agak2nya kes apa yg peguam cabuk ni menang kes? ker takder satu kes pon menang semua kalah

peguam cabuk mana ada handle kes.. dia setakat sain SnP Rumah je
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:02 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by fly1109 at 2-8-2008 10:27 AM
Apanama favourite quote Maideen............... absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.............. setuju!!!!!!!!!!

Ikut faham aku, burden of proof is the onus of the accuser. Setakat ...


Bagus kalau dah faham tentang evidence itu...yakni laporan itu bukan lah bukti Anwar tidak meliwat Saiful... . Syabas kerana tak benak sangat...

Apa dia? Accuser tak ada proof? Setahu saya Anwar bulom didakwa lagi. Kalau dia didakwa pastinya pendakwa akan mengemukakan bukti...

Anwar~Penat lelah not wasted....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:02 AM | Show all posts
apsal Sepol tak nak lantik peguam cabuk C.I ni jadi peguam? kalau lantik dia jadi peguam kompem ler Sepol boleh menang, ialah takder bukti liwat pon dia boleh buat Anwar bersalah
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:03 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by DTECCONAN at 2-8-2008 11:01 AM
adakah peguam cabuk C.I akan turut menjadi peguam Sepol?

dia dgn peguam level umno cam patail tu ni boleh laa.. cuba dgn peguam2 terhebat non UMNO tu...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:03 AM | Show all posts

Reply #317 DTECCONAN's post

yup peguam penjilat jubuq sepol....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:04 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by DTECCONAN at 2-8-2008 11:02 AM
apsal Sepol tak nak lantik peguam cabuk C.I ni jadi peguam? kalau lantik dia jadi peguam kompem ler Sepol boleh menang, ialah takder bukti liwat pon dia boleh buat Anwar bersalah

kalau prof pon ada jenis kangkung..
peguam pon ada jenis kangkung gak

prof jenis kangkung cam VC UUM yg tak reti IPP
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:06 AM | Show all posts
kalau peguam cabuk C.I jadi peguam Sepol

antara bukti Anwar meliwat Sepol = benda plastik dimasukkan kedlm jubur Sepol
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 2-8-2008 11:13 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by DTECCONAN at 2-8-2008 10:16 AM
peguam Maideen. tak reti membaca

Anda sudah faham penerangan Maideen di post terakhir page ini?

http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=367381&extra=page%3D2&page=6

Anda masih marah kerana Maideen mendedahkan kebodohan anda?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:16 AM | Show all posts
peguam cabuk Maideen titik tak reti membaca, org lain tulis assault maknanya diserang, dia kata org   tulis assault tu maknanya diliwat

kesian, BODOH sangat tu sebab tu takder kes dia menang
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:17 AM | Show all posts

Reply #322 Maideen.'s post

betul tu peguam cebuk Maideen titik, dlm kes Sepol bahan plastik yg dimasukkan ke dlm jubur Sepol akan dipenjara 20 tahun
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-8-2008 11:17 AM | Show all posts

Reply #323 DTECCONAN's post

psssttt
teringat kat PEGUAM NEGARA yg kalah kes dgn PEGUAM SPORE

tu la tarafnya peguam mesia
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

22-11-2024 04:47 AM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.071594 second(s), 28 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list