Mahkamah Agung Amerika Syarikat memutuskan bahawa Donald Trump telah melangkaui bidang kuasanya sebagai seorang Presiden dengan mengenakan tarif timbal balik yang tinggi menyebabkan perdagangan global terjejas.
Panel Mahkamah Agung yang terdiri daripada majoriti berhaluan konservatif 6-3 telah merumuskan, Akta Kuasa Ekonomi Kecemasan Antarabangsa (IEEPA) bahawa, "Presiden tidak mempunyai kuasa mutlak mewujudkan tarif perdagangan".
Walaupun Trump menggunakan isu tarif sebagai helah dan strategi rundingan, beliau menggunakan akta kuasa ekonomi kecemasan yang tidak pernah dibuat oleh seorang presiden sebelumnya ke atas rakan-rakan dagangan AS.
Selepas dilantik semula sebagai presiden, Trump mengumumkan tarif timbal balik dengan menggunakan alasan seperti masalah penyeledupan dadah yang meningkat serta kelemahan pihak imigresen bagi menekan negara-negara seperti Mexico, Kanada dan China.
Penghujahan oleh Mahkamah Agung turut menyebut tarif yang dikenakan oleh pentadbiran Trump melalui akta IEEPA adalah tidak sah di sisi undang-undang negara dan perlu mendapat persetujuan anggota kongres AS.
Post time 21-2-2026 08:04 AMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Trump nailed it.... Ummah hypocrisy mahu hancur kan economy amerika... Fail big time... during reciprocal tariff negotiation...apabila perlu buat transparency...
Boycott hanya hatred propaganda reality bilateral trade US - Malaysia perlu stick like glue.. Untuk malaysia economy ecosystem..
If aku jadi macai pakar economy anwar ibrahim sembang forecast ter paling BRICS - US geopolitic... And macai kuat copy and paste link .. Already losing face... Economy ecosystem negara sendiri fail..
Now.... Back to normal.. Proven... Majority hanya sembang kencang...luckily dia tidak replace ambassador dengan nick adam...respect is earned not given
Post time 21-2-2026 09:04 AMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Yang penting during negotiation...malaysia-US secure businesses... Dari earth mineral... EE.. semiconductor industry.. AI data centre andcloud...and etc
Too bad if macai ter sakiti...orang lain lebih tahu mana lebih untuk di prioritized...
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
Tsk tsk tsk..typical Yuen Kong.. bila dah takde modal mula petik isu bangsa. Amerika pun tak hingin nak tengok muka sendu ko la wey setakat pernah duduk US jual baju baby online tu.
Btw, selamat menyambut tahun kuda...DARSITAAAAA!!
Trump nak juga kenakan tarif.. ada alternatif katanya...
Trump brings in new 10% tariff as Supreme Court rejects his global import taxes
60 minutes ago
US President Donald Trump has imposed a new 10% global tariff to replace ones struck down by the Supreme Court, calling the ruling "terrible" and lambasting the justices who rejected his trade policy as "fools".
The president unveiled the plan shortly after the justices outlawed most of the global tariffs the White House announced last year.
In a 6-3 decision, the court held that the president had overstepped his powers.
The decision was a major victory for businesses and US states that had challenged the duties, opening the door to potentially billions of dollars in tariff refunds, while also injecting new uncertainty into the global trade landscape.
Speaking from the White House on Friday, Trump indicated that refunds would not come without a legal battle, saying he expected the matter to be tied up in court for years.
He also said he would turn to other laws to press ahead with his tariffs, which he has argued encourage investment and manufacturing in the US.
"We have alternatives - great alternatives and we'll be a lot stronger for it," he said.
The court battle was focused on import taxes that Trump unveiled last year on goods from nearly every country in the world.
The tariffs initially targeted Mexico, Canada and China, before expanding dramatically to dozens of trade partners on what the president billed as "Liberation Day" last April.
The White House had cited a 1977 law, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president power to "regulate" trade in response to an emergency.
But the measures sparked outcry at home and abroad from firms facing an abrupt rise in taxes on shipments entering the US, and fuelled worries that the levies would lead to higher prices.
Arguing before the court last year, lawyers for the challenging states and small businesses said that the law used by the president to impose the levies made no mention of the word "tariffs".
They said that Congress did not intend to hand off its power to tax or give the president an "open-ended power to junk" other existing trade deals and tariff rules.
In his opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, sided with that view.
"When Congress has delegated its tariff powers, it has done so in explicit terms and subject to strict limits," he wrote.
"Had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs, it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes."
Subtitle
Well, thank you very much for being here. The Supreme Court's ruling on tariffs is deeply disappointing. And I'm ashamed of certain members of the court, absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what's right for our country.
I'd like to thank and congratulate Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh for their strength and wisdom. and love of our country. Which is right now very proud of is right now very proud of those justices. When you read the dissenting opinions, there's no way that anyone can argue against them.
There's no way. Foreign countries that have been ripping us off for years are ecstatic. They're so happy. And they're dancing in the streets, but they won't be dancing for long, that I can assure you. The Democrats on the court, are thrilled, but they will automatically vote no. They're an automatic no, just like in Congress, they're an automatic no.
They're against anything that makes America strong, healthy. And great again they also are a frankly disgrace to our nation, those justices.
They're an automatic no no matter how good a case you have. it's a no. you can't knock their loyalty. It's one thing you can do with some of
our people.
Others think they're being politically correct, which has happened before far too often with certain members of this court, and it's happened so often with this court. What a shame, having to do with voting in particular, when in fact they're just being fools and lapdogs for the RINOs and the radical left Democrats and not that they should have anything at all to do with it. They're very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution.
It's my opinion that the court has been swayed by foreign interests and a political movement that is far smaller than people would ever think. It's a small movement. I won by millions of votes. We won in a landslide with all the cheating that went on. There was a lot of it, but we still won in a landslide, too big to rig. But these people are obnoxious, ignorant, and loud, they're very loud, and I think certain justices are afraid of that.
They don't want to do the right thing. They're afraid of it. This was an important case to me, more as a symbol of economic national security. And also I would say. Just for our country itself so important because we're doing so well as a country we've never done so well.
The good news is that there are methods, practices, statutes, and authorities as recognized by the entire court in this terrible decision. And also is recognized by Congress which they refer to that are even stronger than the IEPA tariffs available to me as President of the United States and in actuality I was very modest in my ask of other countries and businesses because I wanted. To do, and it's very important. I want to be very well behaved. Because I wanted to do anything, I didn't want to do anything that would affect the decision of the court because I understand the court. I understand how they're very easily swayed. I want to be a good boy. I have very effectively utilized tariffs over the past year to make America great again.
Our stock market has just recently broken 50,000 on the Dow and simultaneously and even more amazingly broken 70, broken 7000 on the S&P, two numbers that everybody thought upon our landslide election victory could not be attained. Think of that. Nobody thought it was possible to do it within 4 years, and we did it in 1 year. They said you'll never be able, you'll go back and you read the geniuses read their statements, all of the Nobel Prize winners.
In economics they said no you couldn't do it in 4 years. Well, we didn't do it in 4 years, we did it in 1 year. We broke every record in the book and we're continuing to do so.
Post time 21-2-2026 12:51 AM
变色卡
Author
