[MERGED]-Debmey: SHOW PROOF THAT PROPHET MOHAMMAD IS A PAEDOPHILE?

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 12:10 AM

Well, will you give proof that she's unhappy? 100% you can't!!

How could she possibly be under hosue arrest till she died?

If she were unhappy, she could just re-married. Why didn't she?

She would have if she could but she wasn't allowed to.

SHE WASN'T KEPT UNDER HOUSE ARREST. YOU HAVE MADE VERY SERIOUS ACCUSATION TO HER.

Yes she was. She was a ring leader in teh first muslim civil war and lost.

SHE DID PERFORM UMRAH (WHICH HAVE TO BE OUTSIDE HOUSE), AFTER THE DEMISE OF PROPHET.

proof please.
even if she did, she was under supservision.

You don't understand Islam, but you try to pretend understand Islam according to your narrow minded full of hatred towards Islam itself.

No sir, it is you who had no idea of islamic history.

You dared accouse Aisha was unhappy BUT CANNOT PROVIDE SOLID PROOF.

widowed at 17, no kids, kept under house arrest, cannot remarry. What do you expect?
If she claim she was happy, it is you who must bear the burden of proof sir.

mnm77 · Post time 10-6-2007 12:14 AM

Poor, mistakes everywhere and I don't want to EXPLAIN TO SOMEONE WHO WOULD NOT USE HIS BRAIN AND KEEP REPEATING WRONG THING

You accuse she was not happy but you did not give proof but wrong facts.

I rest my case

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 12:21 AM

I already gave it to you. Widowed at 17, cannot remarry, under house arrest until dead.

Where is your proof she was happy? Where?

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 12:22 AM

and not forgetting, she was barren remember? I think it had to do with her starting having sex when she was only 9 years old.

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 12:26 AM

So Mohd was the best of the worst?
And you get the best of the worst as a model for mankind?
Aren't you muslims losers?

Png_Prince · Post time 10-6-2007 10:06 AM

You are a classic hypocrite. See u come up with craps to justify child marriages in hinduism. You say Prophet Muhammad execute all enemies ? Where do you got that info ? As usual u r hallucinating. Nothing new.

Read my post #41 and #42, i have shown the hadiths which contradicts aisya's age. The reference given in red colour.

Png_Prince · Post time 10-6-2007 10:08 AM

You are the real loser coz u r ashamed even to tell ur sect in christianity. Only losers feel ashamed to tell about their religion.

barney50 · Post time 10-6-2007 04:12 PM

Png_Prince,

So you believe what these Muslims scholars had written even though it is mentioned in hadith Bukhari that Mohammed married Aysha when she was 6 years old? Which means to say history is being rewriten, well it is the same when archelogist and scholars said the Quran you have now is not the original one as their discovery in Yeman shows there are quranic text found duirng their dig which shows it differs from what Mulsims have now. Which would proof that the original quran was hidden away and a distorted and corrupted Quran is being used by Muslims around the world for centuries. Care to give your view on that?

loona · Post time 10-6-2007 04:46 PM

Originally posted by barney50 at 10-6-2007 04:12 PM
Png_Prince,

So you believe what these Muslims scholars had written even though it is mentioned in hadith Bukhari that Mohammed married Aysha when she was 6 years old? Which means to say histor ...

Asyik2 Quran kat Yaman..Quran kat Yaman, Quran kat Yaman....
care to elaborate the difference?

Png_Prince · Post time 10-6-2007 04:50 PM

I have already shown the contradicting hadiths regarding aisya's age. I dont know what u r blabbing here. Show me the link to what u claim here otherwise just hallucinate as usual barney

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 06:22 PM

No you didn't. You merely showed some verses that did not even state aisha's age. What you did was to make claims abt Aisha's age based on false assumptions that can never be verified.

Not only that, there was never any dispute over such the alledged contradictions that you brought up, in the Muslism world for more than a thousand years.

Png_Prince · Post time 10-6-2007 06:24 PM

Can u prove to me its a false assumption ? Based on what ?

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 06:30 PM

You did not even back up one of those assumption with evidence at all.

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 06:31 PM

and can you tell me why if your alledge contradictions are true, why didn't muslims do anything to the hadiths for more than a thousand years even up till today?

Png_Prince · Post time 10-6-2007 06:41 PM

The simple question i ask, there are so many contradiction in bible, yet you christians didnt do anything till now. Ur answer is those contradictions didnt affect the doctrine. What a lame excuse. So u got my point ?

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 06:49 PM

Thats because all the alledged contradictions by muslims are not valid contradictions at all but merely different perspectives on an issue and christians have managed to explain all those.

The same cannot be said about those hadiths and suras of yours. It is you who claim contradictions, not me. You need to explain to me.

Png_Prince · Post time 10-6-2007 07:04 PM

Dont bull#. U havent explained anything abt the contradictions in other threads. U r just good at ahahaha and huahahaha monkey chant only

U have to prove to me beyond doubt first before i defend. U couldnt prove beyond doubt in first place. The burden is in you to prove it beyond doubt. Im waiting. Prove to me.

Debmey · Post time 10-6-2007 07:07 PM

Well, Christians don't even recognise those as contradictions, so how can Christianc change the bible.

You on the other hand as a Muslim acknowledge that Muslism recognise there are contradictions in the hadiths and quran. So it is you who shld explain to us why Muslims keep those contradictions around. Ahahahahahahahaha.................

You see how you get so easily stuck in trying to defend Mohd's paedophilia?

cheers

Png_Prince · Post time 10-6-2007 07:28 PM

Then what u call contradictions then ? Contribution ?

See, u have started ur monkey chant ahahahaha when stucked. U failed to prove beyond doubt.

Let say a reporter wrote : Debmey arrived at the mall at 2.32pm
Another reporter wrote : Debmey arrived at the mall at 2.40pm

Can u tell me the contradictions and the impact on the sentence. Is it a major impact or minor. Does the contradiction gives a lot new meaning to the sentence ?

tickmeoff · Post time 10-6-2007 09:04 PM

Originally posted by Png_Prince at 10-6-2007 07:28 PM
Let say a reporter wrote : Debmey arrived at the mall at 2.32pm
Another reporter wrote : Debmey arrived at the mall at 2.40pm

Can u tell me the contradictions and the impact on the sentence. Is it a major impact or minor. Does the contradiction gives a lot new meaning to the sentence ?

That could be explained according to relativity, from an observer point of view. each at different distance from debmey.