[MERGED] SPIRULINA

Kesahihan product ni ada merata-rata di dunia..tapi mungkin gak sebab orang yang sentiasa mencari keuntungan, tu la sebabnya harga spirulina ni tak munasabah kekadang..perbezaan harga yang ketara sangatlah dikesali .

Namun dari penggunaan bahan ni, bagi yang telah menggunakannya memang boleh dipercayai, terpulang pada result dia kan...

Gastrik yang aku alami akibat gangguan stress, tekanan kerja dan hidup, dapat ku atasi dgn spirulina ini, kalau dulu aku selalu makan ubat gatrik sekarang aku tidak lagi memakan ubat yang ada dos dadah ini. Namun aku bersyukur kerana, ada alternatif untuk mengurangkan kesakitan ku ini. Malah, aku boleh makan yang dulu aku selalu dilarang makan, yang penting sebelum makan aku mesti megambil spirulina..

Bagi yang telah memakannya juga, ianya sejenis supplement yang boleh membuang toksik dlm badan, kalau tak percaya, cuba memakan pada awal pagi sebelum breakfast, dan selepas breakfast atau tak breakfast, mesti nak ke toilet pada masa itu.

Namun, aku suka nak share pengalaman aku mengambil supplement ini dan aku tak pasti kalau semua orang 100% mengambil diet yang sempurna dari makanan seharian dalam gaya hidup yang tak menentu sekarang ni...

Anyway, selamat mencuba

Acong

Algae: False Claims and Hype

Blue-green algae (one of eleven groups of algae) are microscopic plants that grow mainly in brackish ponds and lakes throughout the world. Of the more than 1500 known species, some are useful as food, while others have been reported to cause gastroenteritis and hepatitis. Spirulina entered the limelight in 1981 when The National Enquirer promoted it as an "all natural," "safe diet pill" that contains phenylalanine (an amino acid), which "acts directly on the appetite center." The article also said it was "an incredible 65% protein, making it the most protein-packed food in the world."

These claims are bunkum. The FDA has concluded that there is no evidence that spirulina (or phenylalanine) is effective as an appetite suppressant. The FDA has also noted that the "65% protein" claim is meaningless because, taken according to their label, spirulina products provide only negligible amounts of protein.


MISCORP and Light Force

In 1982, Microalgae International Sales Corp. (MISCORP) and its founder, Christopher Hills, agreed to pay $225,000 to settle charges that they had made false claims about spirulina. The company had claimed that its spirulina products were effective for weight control and had therapeutic value against diabetes, anemia, liver disease, and ulcers.

Light Force, also founded by Hills, marketed spirulina products with claims that they can suppress appetite, boost immunity, and increase energy. Company sales materials claimed that spirulina is a "superfood" and "works to cleanse and detoxify the body." In a 1987 issue of Light Force's magazine, The Enlightener, vice president and corporate attorney Steve Kochen spells out the company's "legal guidelines." These include:

*  Current regulations . . . prohibit both the company and its Distributors from using any medical research to promote, advertise or sell the products.
*  You are free to provide any responsible medical research for the sole purpose of education and information . . . . as long as no mention is made to any specific products, and no attempt is made to sell products at the time the information is made available.
*  When using the mail to send research information . . . . any sales information must be provided separately and may not be linked to the medical research.
*  You are free to share your personal experience with any of our products, even if that experience involves the alleviation of some health problems or symptoms. However, it is also imperative that you qualify your personal testimonial by saying, "Of course, we cannot make any medical claim for our products or guarantee you will have the same experience."

Despite all this, The Enlightener carried reports about users who lost weight or recovered from arthritis, cancer, multiple sclerosis, and serious injuries while taking Light Force products. None of these reports is accompanied by significant documentation. In 1996, Light Force merged into Royal BodyCare, a multilevel company with a much larger product line.


K.C. Laboratories and Cell Tech

In 1982, K.C. Laboratories of Klamath Falls, Oregon, and its president, Victor H. Kollman, began selling Blue Green Manna products (derived from another type of alga) with claims that they were effective against a wide range of health problems. In 1983, the FDA began legal action to stop the scheme, but marketing of the products did not stop. Finally, in 1986, at the agency's request, a U.S. District Court judge issued a permanent injunction ordering all parties involved to stop manufacturing, distributing, and selling blue-green algae harvested from Klamath Lake, Oregon. Explaining his decision, the judge said:

At the trial on January 9, 1986, the government introduced additional evidence of the widespread use of blue-green algae Manna products, and of the therapeutic claims that were made for these products. Victor Kollman denied that he had made therapeutic claims. . . . Nevertheless he continued to claim his product has a beneficial effect on the human body . . . as a food, and not a drug. The government showed that taken at the recommended dosage of 1.5 grams, its value as a nutrient is negligible. Further, the cost of the defendant's products, which exceeds $300 per pound, is so high as compared to other sources of the same nutrients that it is apparent that these products are not intended to be used as a food.

In 1985, the judge had ruled that the products were misbranded and unapproved new drugs, and had issued a preliminary injunction against their sale. His 1986 order cited evidence that more than 2,500 people had been distributing Manna products with therapeutic claims that defied the injunction. He also reported that since the injunction was issued, hundreds of distributors had written or telephoned with claims that Manna products had cured them or members of their families of such problems as Alzheimer's disease, heart trouble, skin disturbances, allergies, prostate problems, lack of sex drive, emotional problems, and alcoholism.

At the 1986 trial, the defendants argued that because other algal products are sold as foods or food supplements, they too should be allowed to sell blue-green algae as food-changing the packaging, trade name, and distribution system if necessary. But the judge ruled that "the demand can no longer be controlled, even if the defendants have a desire to do it." Stating that Kollman had attempted to mislead not only the court but also purchasers of the products, the judge concluded that a permanent injunction was necessary to prevent the defendants from "benefiting from their past violations by meeting the demand they had created for their products." In other words, even if questionable claims were stopped, people who believed the previously made claims would still buy the products [1,2].

Although the judge's ruling appears to have ended the sale of Manna products, a similar line called Super Blue Green Algae is still marketed by Cell Tech Inc., a company headed by Kollman's brother Daryl. According to a company promotional tape, "By detoxifying your systems and balancing your nutritional levels, Super Blue Green provides your body and spirit with ingredients that result in experiences of increased energy, mental clarity, dietary control and feelings of overall well-being. This can enable people to deal with the many stresses of this modern world."

Cell Tech's literature states that the products do not provide "cures" for diseases and are not intended as a substitute for medical care. Despite this disclaimer, many distributors have made dubious therapeutic claims in advertisements, at health expositions, and in private sales pitches to prospective customers. In 2003, a California judge ruled that 30 of Cell Tech's claims has been deceptive and ordered the compan y to stop making them [3].


Possible Toxicity

On May 5, 1999, the Canadian Health Protection Branch warned that products containing blue-green algae may contain toxins harmful to the liver and some species of blue-green algae naturally produce toxins known as microcystins. To determine the extent of this problem, Health Canada, through the Office of Natural Health Products, Therapeutic Products Program, and the Food Directorate of the Health Protection Branch, surveyed products to determine how many are on the market, in what forms they are, and the levels of microcystins they contain. On September 27, 1999, the survey results were announced in a news release:

Results of Health Canada's market survey testing of blue-green algal products show that no microcystins were detected in products made from only one type of blue-green algae, Spirulina blue-green algae, which is generally harvested from controlled ponds.

However, testing indicates that for many non-Spirulina blue-green algal products, harvested from natural lakes, consumption according to manufacturers directions results in a daily intake of microcystins above that considered acceptable by Health Canada and the World Health Organization. Microcystins are toxins which accumulate in the liver and can cause liver damage. They are naturally produced by some kinds of blue-green algae. Blue-green algal products are sold in tablet, capsule, or powder forms as food supplements, often as a natural source of minerals.

Health Canada began its broad sampling of blue-green algal products available on the Canadian market in May 1999, after several blue-green algal products were found to contain unacceptable levels of microcystins. Analytical testing was then performed to measure the levels of microcystins in the blue-green algal products, and the level of risk to Canadian consumers was determined. Based on the results, products made only from Spirulina blue-green algae are no longer considered a microcystin-related health risk.

For non-Spirulina blue-green algal products, follow-up will be done on a case by case basis. Health Canada's Food Directorate has communicated the test results and their health significance to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, and has indicated that products on the Canadian market, when consumed according to manufacturers directions, should not exceed the daily intake of microcystins considered acceptable by the World Health Organization and Health Canada. Subsequent compliance measures are the responsibility of the CFIA.

Health Canada recommends that children not be given products containing the non-Spirulina blue-green algae until measures to address any risk have been implemented. Because of their lower body weight, children are at greater risk of developing serious illness from blue-green algal products containing elevated levels of microcystins, especially if these products are ingested for an extended period of time.

Despite recent reports that blue-green algal products can be used as a treatment for Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), Health Canada has not received any evidence to support such claims, and has not authorized the marketing of any blue-green algal products for any therapeutic purpose. In Canada, the blue-green algal products examined to date are sold as foods, and Health Canada does not allow therapeutic claims for substances sold as foods.

Adult consumers who choose to use products containing non-Spirulina blue-green algae should do so for short periods of time only. Adverse symptoms from long-term use of these products (weeks to months) may not be obvious but could range from a feeling of general malaise or gastrointestinal discomfort, to jaundice. Concerned consumers should contact their health care professionals for advice [4].

In May 2000, the Oregon Department of Health released data from a survey which found that 63 out of 87 samples contained microcystin levels above its regulatory limit of 1 microgram/gram. The published abstract states:

The presence of blue-green algae (BGA) toxins in surface waters used for drinking water sources and recreation is receiving increasing attention around the world as a public health concern. . . . BGA products are commonly consumed in the United States, Canada, and Europe for their putative beneficial effects, including increased energy and elevated mood. Many of these products contain Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, a BGA that is harvested from Upper Klamath Lake (UKL) in southern Oregon, where the growth of a toxic BGA, Microcystis aeruginosa, is a regular occurrence. M. aeruginosa produces compounds called microcystins, which are potent hepatotoxins and probable tumor promoters. Because M. aeruginosa coexists with A. flos-aquae, it can be collected inadvertently during the harvesting process, resulting in microcystin contamination of BGA products. In fall 1996, the Oregon Health Division learned that UKL was experiencing an extensive M. aeruginosa bloom, and an advisory was issued recommending against water contact. The advisory prompted calls from consumers of BGA products, who expressed concern about possible contamination of these products with microcystins. In response, the Oregon Health Division and the Oregon Department of Agriculture established a regulatory limit of 1 礸/g for microcystins in BGA-containing products and tested BGA products for the presence of microcystins. Microcystins were detected in 85 of 87 samples tested, with 63 samples (72%) containing concentrations > 1 礸/g. HPLC and ELISA tentatively identified microcystin-LR, the most toxic microcystin variant, as the predominant congener [5].


The Bottom Line

Spirulina products contain no nutrients that are not readily available from food -- at a much lower price. They have no proven value for treating any medical problem, and some may contain potent toxins.

Link........!!!

Kalau benda ada posibbility toxin seperti yang digembar gemburkan oleh ko ni, apasal penjualannya tidak dihentikan oleh kerajaan...Talking nonsense jer all the way...Sekarang ni dah byk sykt yg menjual spirulina ni...pharmacy pun jual..Kalau betul le tak ada faedah...kenapa dibiarkan menjual produk ni kat pasaran...

Acong

Originally posted by meeonly at 20-3-2004 03:35 PM:
Kalau benda ada posibbility toxin seperti yang digembar gemburkan oleh ko ni, apasal penjualannya tidak dihentikan oleh kerajaan...Talking nonsense jer all the way...Sekarang ni dah byk sykt yg men ...

sila baca btol

Acong

Spirulina products contain no nutrients that are not readily available from food -- at a much lower price. They have no proven value for treating any medical problem, and some may contain potent toxins.

mbhcsf

i dah lupa you know what i called someone at one instituition, he asked me to become a salesperson / dealer may be about this spirulina or this unicell microoraganism lah stuffs lah.... ..i said to him that i am quite sceptical about it and i don't think he should do that esp when something is consumed and  per oral stuffs ni.. so ..i was convinced by him that there is aguy ( a professor actually) in JApan that has conducted  a lot of research regarding spirullina lah ..over the past 70 ? may be 17 years..what should i do?/
i kindly decline the offerlah..no prob with that...

but then.. i just wondering whether  there are any  evidence based medicine articles about this  matter  or randomised controlled trials conducted to back up  their  points???

Originally posted by Acong at 03-12-2003 15:20:
Spirulina products contain no nutrients that are not readily available from food -- at a much lower price. They have no proven value for treating any medical problem, and s ...

:spd:

CIK OII, BENDA INI MASIH BERLELUASA DIJUAL, KALAU DIA BERTOXINS, IMPOTENT SEKALIPUN, KENAPA TAK BANNED JER PRODUCT NI TERUS DARI MARKET....KO NI TAK PAHAM KE

mbhcsf

you must know dear sometimes things happened before any effective  measure could have been taken place. Like thalidomide.. and all those ..things in medicine  ade randomised controlled trial yg screen everything itu pun...ade juga missed out ..kita tak nak itu jer...tapi up to you...lah..just careful though...amalkan cara hidup sihat ..ambil gizi seimbang..senaman...

Acong

Originally posted by meeonly at 23-3-2004 11:22 AM:


:spd:

CIK OII, BENDA INI MASIH BERLELUASA DIJUAL, KALAU DIA BERTOXINS, IMPOTENT SEKALIPUN, KENAPA TAK BANNED JER PRODUCT NI TERUS DARI MARKET....KO NI TAK PAHAM KE[ ...

tak nampak ke aku underline 'some may' tue? :hmm:

Kalau bertoxin, dah lama Kementerian Kesihatan announce dan melarang rakyat dia ambil supplement ni macam di lakukan pada satu produk keluaran Australia tu...

What do you think?

Acong

Originally posted by meeonly at 24-3-2004 10:06 AM:
Kalau bertoxin, dah lama Kementerian Kesihatan announce dan melarang rakyat dia ambil supplement ni macam di lakukan pada satu produk keluaran Australia tu...

What do you think?

since i hightlighted 'some may', it's difficult for Kementerian Kesihatan to ban all Spirulina products..... then again, it's the same 'tidak apa' attitude by the related authority.

miss_baby

sapa yg nak makan..makan lah..
sapa yg tak nak ..tak yah makan..
tak yah gaduh2..

i baru je nak try elken nyer spirulina..
since dah bace article tu..
mcm sceptical plaks..

hi all....

just nak tanya, for those yang kata spirulina tak elok tu, how do u explain those yang sakit and then consume spirulina, then penyakit dia bertambah baik? any medical/scientific explanation for that? any doctors can explain?

for me la kan.... at least spirulina tu natural food... compared if you pegi doctor, then doctor bagi ubat yang mengandungi macam2 jenis drugs tu.. mana lagi elok?  

tambahan pulak, the food yang kita makan nowadays taklah sesegar seperti zaman dulu-dulu...   contohnya vegetables kena sembur dengan chemicals supaya nampak segar...  ikan pun kena tambah chemicals masa kat laut sebelum sampai ke darat,pun untuk nampak segar...  then ayam pun dah jadi ayam ekspress,tak membesar secara natural lagi,sebaliknya disuntik macam-macam hormon supaya cepat besar ...  hari ni apa yang kita makan banyak dicemari dengan chemicals...   sebab tu lah nowadays penyakit kanser dah jadi macam kebiasaan... where do you think it comes from? hmm... i'm not a doctor or scientist... but as a normal consumer, we have our rights to 'preserve' our health... kalau hari-hari makan benda-benda yang penuh dengan chemicals,apa kesannya nanti pada jangka panjang?

for me, i consume spirulina with quality grade AAA everyday jugak... ada certification ISO 9002, ada certification from Drug Control Authority Malaysia, and the source is from Hawaii...  harga pun reasonable...

benda ni terpulang pada individu sebenarnya.... kalau rasa perlu and mampu then amalkan la...  kalau semua orang sihat sebab makan spirulina,takut nanti doctors dah hilang income kot...  oppss...;) jangan marree....

rani

masa my friend pregnant, dia kerap buat check-up kat klinik swasta sbb mengalami masalah kurang darah dan cepat letih. then doktor kat klinik tu suggest dia makan spirulina. now dah bersalin dan kesihatan dia lebih baik dari dulu.
pada pendapat i, pengambilan spirulina utk mengubati sesuatu jenis penyakit adalah lebih baik daripada pengambilan ubat doktor yang memang diketahui banyak menggunakan dadah. just my 1 cent.

mix_chinese

kawan mix pula dia ambil spirulina ni dlm mengandung.. Sekali anak dia keluar.. ha 4.5 kg... besar gila..

Acong

Algae: False Claims and Hype

Blue-green algae (one of eleven groups of algae) are microscopic plants that grow mainly in brackish ponds and lakes throughout the world. Of the more than 1500 known species, some are useful as food, while others have been reported to cause gastroenteritis and hepatitis. Spirulina entered the limelight in 1981 when The National Enquirer promoted it as an "all natural," "safe diet pill" that contains phenylalanine (an amino acid), which "acts directly on the appetite center." The article also said it was "an incredible 65% protein, making it the most protein-packed food in the world."

These claims are bunkum. The FDA has concluded that there is no evidence that spirulina (or phenylalanine) is effective as an appetite suppressant. The FDA has also noted that the "65% protein" claim is meaningless because, taken according to their label, spirulina products provide only negligible amounts of protein.


MISCORP and Light Force

In 1982, Microalgae International Sales Corp. (MISCORP) and its founder, Christopher Hills, agreed to pay $225,000 to settle charges that they had made false claims about spirulina. The company had claimed that its spirulina products were effective for weight control and had therapeutic value against diabetes, anemia, liver disease, and ulcers.

Light Force, also founded by Hills, marketed spirulina products with claims that they can suppress appetite, boost immunity, and increase energy. Company sales materials claimed that spirulina is a "superfood" and "works to cleanse and detoxify the body." In a 1987 issue of Light Force's magazine, The Enlightener, vice president and corporate attorney Steve Kochen spells out the company's "legal guidelines." These include:

*  Current regulations . . . prohibit both the company and its Distributors from using any medical research to promote, advertise or sell the products.
*  You are free to provide any responsible medical research for the sole purpose of education and information . . . . as long as no mention is made to any specific products, and no attempt is made to sell products at the time the information is made available.
*  When using the mail to send research information . . . . any sales information must be provided separately and may not be linked to the medical research.
*  You are free to share your personal experience with any of our products, even if that experience involves the alleviation of some health problems or symptoms. However, it is also imperative that you qualify your personal testimonial by saying, "Of course, we cannot make any medical claim for our products or guarantee you will have the same experience."

Despite all this, The Enlightener carried reports about users who lost weight or recovered from arthritis, cancer, multiple sclerosis, and serious injuries while taking Light Force products. None of these reports is accompanied by significant documentation. In 1996, Light Force merged into Royal BodyCare, a multilevel company with a much larger product line.


K.C. Laboratories and Cell Tech

In 1982, K.C. Laboratories of Klamath Falls, Oregon, and its president, Victor H. Kollman, began selling Blue Green Manna products (derived from another type of alga) with claims that they were effective against a wide range of health problems. In 1983, the FDA began legal action to stop the scheme, but marketing of the products did not stop. Finally, in 1986, at the agency's request, a U.S. District Court judge issued a permanent injunction ordering all parties involved to stop manufacturing, distributing, and selling blue-green algae harvested from Klamath Lake, Oregon. Explaining his decision, the judge said:

At the trial on January 9, 1986, the government introduced additional evidence of the widespread use of blue-green algae Manna products, and of the therapeutic claims that were made for these products. Victor Kollman denied that he had made therapeutic claims. . . . Nevertheless he continued to claim his product has a beneficial effect on the human body . . . as a food, and not a drug. The government showed that taken at the recommended dosage of 1.5 grams, its value as a nutrient is negligible. Further, the cost of the defendant's products, which exceeds $300 per pound, is so high as compared to other sources of the same nutrients that it is apparent that these products are not intended to be used as a food.

In 1985, the judge had ruled that the products were misbranded and unapproved new drugs, and had issued a preliminary injunction against their sale. His 1986 order cited evidence that more than 2,500 people had been distributing Manna products with therapeutic claims that defied the injunction. He also reported that since the injunction was issued, hundreds of distributors had written or telephoned with claims that Manna products had cured them or members of their families of such problems as Alzheimer's disease, heart trouble, skin disturbances, allergies, prostate problems, lack of sex drive, emotional problems, and alcoholism.

At the 1986 trial, the defendants argued that because other algal products are sold as foods or food supplements, they too should be allowed to sell blue-green algae as food-changing the packaging, trade name, and distribution system if necessary. But the judge ruled that "the demand can no longer be controlled, even if the defendants have a desire to do it." Stating that Kollman had attempted to mislead not only the court but also purchasers of the products, the judge concluded that a permanent injunction was necessary to prevent the defendants from "benefiting from their past violations by meeting the demand they had created for their products." In other words, even if questionable claims were stopped, people who believed the previously made claims would still buy the products [1,2].

Although the judge's ruling appears to have ended the sale of Manna products, a similar line called Super Blue Green Algae is still marketed by Cell Tech Inc., a company headed by Kollman's brother Daryl. According to a company promotional tape, "By detoxifying your systems and balancing your nutritional levels, Super Blue Green provides your body and spirit with ingredients that result in experiences of increased energy, mental clarity, dietary control and feelings of overall well-being. This can enable people to deal with the many stresses of this modern world."

Cell Tech's literature states that the products do not provide "cures" for diseases and are not intended as a substitute for medical care. Despite this disclaimer, many distributors have made dubious therapeutic claims in advertisements, at health expositions, and in private sales pitches to prospective customers. In 2003, a California judge ruled that 30 of Cell Tech's claims has been deceptive and ordered the compan y to stop making them [3].


Possible Toxicity

On May 5, 1999, the Canadian Health Protection Branch warned that products containing blue-green algae may contain toxins harmful to the liver and some species of blue-green algae naturally produce toxins known as microcystins. To determine the extent of this problem, Health Canada, through the Office of Natural Health Products, Therapeutic Products Program, and the Food Directorate of the Health Protection Branch, surveyed products to determine how many are on the market, in what forms they are, and the levels of microcystins they contain. On September 27, 1999, the survey results were announced in a news release:

Results of Health Canada's market survey testing of blue-green algal products show that no microcystins were detected in products made from only one type of blue-green algae, Spirulina blue-green algae, which is generally harvested from controlled ponds.

However, testing indicates that for many non-Spirulina blue-green algal products, harvested from natural lakes, consumption according to manufacturers directions results in a daily intake of microcystins above that considered acceptable by Health Canada and the World Health Organization. Microcystins are toxins which accumulate in the liver and can cause liver damage. They are naturally produced by some kinds of blue-green algae. Blue-green algal products are sold in tablet, capsule, or powder forms as food supplements, often as a natural source of minerals.

Health Canada began its broad sampling of blue-green algal products available on the Canadian market in May 1999, after several blue-green algal products were found to contain unacceptable levels of microcystins. Analytical testing was then performed to measure the levels of microcystins in the blue-green algal products, and the level of risk to Canadian consumers was determined. Based on the results, products made only from Spirulina blue-green algae are no longer considered a microcystin-related health risk.

For non-Spirulina blue-green algal products, follow-up will be done on a case by case basis. Health Canada's Food Directorate has communicated the test results and their health significance to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, and has indicated that products on the Canadian market, when consumed according to manufacturers directions, should not exceed the daily intake of microcystins considered acceptable by the World Health Organization and Health Canada. Subsequent compliance measures are the responsibility of the CFIA.

Health Canada recommends that children not be given products containing the non-Spirulina blue-green algae until measures to address any risk have been implemented. Because of their lower body weight, children are at greater risk of developing serious illness from blue-green algal products containing elevated levels of microcystins, especially if these products are ingested for an extended period of time.

Despite recent reports that blue-green algal products can be used as a treatment for Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), Health Canada has not received any evidence to support such claims, and has not authorized the marketing of any blue-green algal products for any therapeutic purpose. In Canada, the blue-green algal products examined to date are sold as foods, and Health Canada does not allow therapeutic claims for substances sold as foods.

Adult consumers who choose to use products containing non-Spirulina blue-green algae should do so for short periods of time only. Adverse symptoms from long-term use of these products (weeks to months) may not be obvious but could range from a feeling of general malaise or gastrointestinal discomfort, to jaundice. Concerned consumers should contact their health care professionals for advice [4].

In May 2000, the Oregon Department of Health released data from a survey which found that 63 out of 87 samples contained microcystin levels above its regulatory limit of 1 microgram/gram. The published abstract states:

The presence of blue-green algae (BGA) toxins in surface waters used for drinking water sources and recreation is receiving increasing attention around the world as a public health concern. . . . BGA products are commonly consumed in the United States, Canada, and Europe for their putative beneficial effects, including increased energy and elevated mood. Many of these products contain Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, a BGA that is harvested from Upper Klamath Lake (UKL) in southern Oregon, where the growth of a toxic BGA, Microcystis aeruginosa, is a regular occurrence. M. aeruginosa produces compounds called microcystins, which are potent hepatotoxins and probable tumor promoters. Because M. aeruginosa coexists with A. flos-aquae, it can be collected inadvertently during the harvesting process, resulting in microcystin contamination of BGA products. In fall 1996, the Oregon Health Division learned that UKL was experiencing an extensive M. aeruginosa bloom, and an advisory was issued recommending against water contact. The advisory prompted calls from consumers of BGA products, who expressed concern about possible contamination of these products with microcystins. In response, the Oregon Health Division and the Oregon Department of Agriculture established a regulatory limit of 1 礸/g for microcystins in BGA-containing products and tested BGA products for the presence of microcystins. Microcystins were detected in 85 of 87 samples tested, with 63 samples (72%) containing concentrations > 1 礸/g. HPLC and ELISA tentatively identified microcystin-LR, the most toxic microcystin variant, as the predominant congener [5].


The Bottom Line

Spirulina products contain no nutrients that are not readily available from food -- at a much lower price. They have no proven value for treating any medical problem, and some may contain potent toxins.

Link........!!!

rani

Originally posted by Acong at 17-5-2004 03:00 PM:
Algae: False Claims and Hype

Blue-green algae (one of eleven groups of algae) are microscopic plants that grow mainly in brackish ponds and lakes throughout the world. Of t ...

thanks Acong. kena ambil masa jugak la nak translate benda ni. dak paham sangat english baku.

i dont understand..why when comes to supplement..and terbukti berkesan..mesti ada article yang menafikannya...:sad::sad::sad:

Acong

Originally posted by enot03 at 25-5-2004 02:25 PM:
i dont understand..why when comes to supplement..and terbukti berkesan..mesti ada article yang menafikannya...:sad::sad::sad:

;) terbukti berkesan camne tu??? ader rujukan scientifik tak??? :hmm:

Sample Text

Betulke spirulina pil binari boleh merosakkan hempedu...seperti thread sebelum ni.sebab tak pernah dengar pun spirulina pil binari ni? macam tak wujud je.siape boleh confirm kan. setahu i, spirulina dan pil binari adalah dua jenis supplementary yang berlainan.tak pernah lak plak dengar ia digabungkan sekali,..