|
|
Originally posted by Muntz at 19-1-2007 09:57 PM
Utk album sesimple Jack tu pun dia dapat $200,000.. bertuah betul lah. Aper pon, dari figure tu, nampak macam JLO tak memilih sangat kan? Rasanya dia tak nego sangat dgn producer kot.... kala ...
masa tuh j.lo awal2 lagi kan? zaman2 x femes, she starts to make an impact dlm film out of sight ( the only j.lo film yg aku rasa die pandai berlakon) in which she realy pushes for a raise....
tp j.lo ni betul2 popular lepas appearance dkt grammy 2000 dgn baju hijau yg seksi giler tuh...
tapi aku rasa byk jer celeb yg ade perfume n clothing line sendiri...
yg ade perfume : beyonce, sarah jessica parker, britney,
yg ade clothing line: j.lo jessica simpsons, eve... ntah, yg lain aku lupe lak... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by calmille at 20-1-2007 01:33 AM
olsens lagi kaya dari britney? :
olsens ni byk merchandise die yg cater for little girls n early teenage ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by sayang_mulut at 19-1-2007 08:36 AM
aku agak surprised sandra bullock dalam list...bagi aku antara die ngan reese witherspoon..reese lagi banyak salary untuk satu flim...
dan aku rase mary kate tu lagi kaye dari madonna..at leas ...
sandra bullock pun dlm top 5 highest paid actress kan? skali ngan julia, nicole, renee, reese, lagipun die dh lama dh popular sejak mid 90's compared to reese yg femes after legally blonde (2001) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by `pSyCho` at 19-1-2007 07:41 PM
Forbes isn't just about money, it's about FAME as well. How popular they are.
This list are sucks. They are alot of more Richest girl than above. Etc Tyra Banks, Beyonce, Shania Twain & mo ...
tp list ni aku rasa mmg base on their wealth la... kalo most powerful people in hollywood usually mmg combine salary n fame in which tom cruise yg top that list |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
korang baca full article dalam Forbes ni baru terjawab segal persoalan yg timbul...
These days, just about any lip-smacking starlet can land a cable reality show or become YouTube's flavor of the week. But fame's 15 fleeting minutes can elapse quicker than it takes to refresh a Web page. Only a bona fide superstar can parlay a moment's stardom into a long and lucrative career. And even that's not enough to land a coveted spot on our first-ever listing of the 20 Richest Women in Entertainment. For that, you'd need a minimum net worth of $45 million.
To compile the list, we scoured the music, television, film and publishing industries to determine which female celebrities have, over the course of their careers, amassed the greatest fortunes in entertainment. We ruled out non-working celebs who essentially live off royalties (Barbra Streisand, for example), and we also excluded "old Hollywood" types like Elizabeth Taylor. The list is entirely confined to today's active megastars.
Of course, the celebrities with the longest careers proved the most daunting to evaluate. Since beginning her career in the early 1980s, Madonna has sold some 200 million albums worldwide and starred in a string of largely disappointing films. She owns an impressive portfolio of properties and briefly ran her own record label, Maverick, a part of Warner Music Group. Our estimate of her net worth--$325 million--is definitely on the conservative side.
Indeed, most of the women on our list cull their earnings from multimedia enterprises. Jennifer Lopez, for example, boasts valuable perfume and fashion lines in addition to her film and music careers; Harry Potter scribe J.K. Rowling now enjoys millions of dollars in royalties and merchandising revenues from the incredibly successful film adaptations of her books; and supermodel Gisele Bundchen, a fixture of Victoria's Secret catalogs, earned her $70 million fortune not just from modeling, but also from a line of successful sandals sold in Brazil.
The youngest women on the list? Twenty-year-old twins and former child stars Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen, who have converted their supporting roles on a middling 1980s sitcom into a multimillion dollar retail empire called Dualstar Entertainment. The twins are often credited in the media as presiding over a fortune of as much as $1 billion. Not so. Despite Dualstar's retail sales of $1 billion, the waifish mini-moguls don't pocket all of it. We estimate their combined net worth at around $100 million.
Britney Spears, 25, also makes the list, despite a relatively brief career that took off only in 1999 with the release of her hit single "...Baby One More Time." Her $100 million fortune was earned largely from music--she has sold over 75 million albums to date--but she has supplemented her income with a profitable line of perfumes and multimillion-dollar endorsement deals.
The richest actress on the list is Julia Roberts, who built her estimated $140 million fortune film by film. The Pretty Woman star was the first actress in Hollywood to command a $20 million-per-film paycheck, a fairly common salary for male superstars like Will Smith and Johnny Depp. Other actresses who make the list largely due to their film fees are Nicole Kidman and Cameron Diaz. Sandra Bullock, who checks in at No. 14 on the list, supplemented movie earnings by producing the ABC sitcom The George Lopez Show, which went into syndication last year.
Martha Stewart is the only woman on the list whose net worth fluctuates just about every second. Her nearly $650 million fortune is based almost entirely on the 28 million shares she owns in Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (nyse: MSO - news - people ). (In 2005, that stake was worth $1 billion.) Though her brief stint in prison forced her to relinquish the chief executive title, she still collects upwards of $2 million a year in salary and bonuses from the firm.
Methodology: Net worth estimates were arrived at by tallying the total earnings, including salaries, record sales, tours, merchandising and royalties over the course of a career. When relevant, we included real estate holdings, shares and other assets. A conservative rate of return was applied, less taxes and agent fees. The list is limited to those female celebrities active in their professional lives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by milo84 at 20-1-2007 03:38 AM
masa tuh j.lo awal2 lagi kan? zaman2 x femes, she starts to make an impact dlm film out of sight ( the only j.lo film yg aku rasa die pandai berlakon) in which she realy pushes for a raise... ...
jessica ada clothing line sendiri? bukannya dia endorse product clothing line orang ker? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by sayang_mulut at 19-1-2007 08:36 AM
dan aku rase mary kate tu lagi kaye dari madonna..at leas ...
Ye la, Madonna mmg miskin berbanding dua ekor tu. MISKIN SESANGAT sampai tak layak masuk list langsung.
Puas hati? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hehe... lama tak tengok ko orseas??  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARIS X MASUK KE ??
NI MESTI PSL HARTE DH ABISKAN KT CLUB ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #28 *Orseas_Urusha's post
|
amboi marah nampak ...dulu beriye2 tak nak masuk forum...:lol... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: ...........Mary Kate & Ashley Olsen = $100 million........
dia org nih start dr kecil.......so dah besar...lagi kaya laa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #32 Eddlisa_uyuk's post
|
tak silap pernah bace kat news mane tah..by the age dorang 25 kot..dorang leh jadi billionaire |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Ustaz_SUFI at 20-1-2007 04:25 PM
PARIS X MASUK KE ??
NI MESTI PSL HARTE DH ABISKAN KT CLUB ...
Dia tak masukkan harta warisan dia.. sbb Paris kata dia nak independent. Pakai duit atas usaha sendiri katanya. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #35 milo84's post
|
paris was fired from her own club kan? klau x silap co-owner die yg pecat die sendiri. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quote]Originally posted by calmille at 21-1-2007 05:47 AM
paris was fired from her own club kan? klau x silap co-owner die yg pecat die sendiri. [/quote
a'a, dh kene pecat dh pun sbb x buat appearance seperti yg dijanjikan, but the club still retain it's name though |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
derang kat sana mana la tak makin kaya.. nak appear kat red carpet pun kena bayar tau.. kat sini ada tak?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by aYuGiLeR at 20-1-2007 10:13 PM
derang kat sana mana la tak makin kaya.. nak appear kat red carpet pun kena bayar tau.. kat sini ada tak??
kat sini,kena di undang oleh pihak media hiburan baru dpt lalu kat karpet merah tu...:bgrin: bayaran?:hmm: brape agaknya diorg bagi tu... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #39 narvmarishka's post
|
mane tak nye..tak silap seat dalam academy award pun dorang dapat gift..pernah dengar hadia2 untuk seat dalam academy awards sampai berpuluh ribu... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|