|
|
[Tempatan]
Tun Mathathir Sebak Ketika Ditemubual TV Indonesia
[Copy link]
|
|
|
aku ingat lagi asa budak2, tv dan media, paper asyik kutuk negeri aku saja
dr mahadey pun kata kerajaan pas kelantan takkan bertahan, lepas menang masa tahun 1990
tgok tgok dah 26 tahun bertahan! dia pun gagal ambik semula kelantan 
lepas tu mula la politik balas dendam
semua peruntukan disalurkan melalui JPP jabatan pembangunan persekutuan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chazey replied at 18-3-2016 03:28 PM
Lansung takda.
Sebab tu bodoh macam kamu masih label ummah Sabah dan Sarawak bercawat. Kerana ...
Amboi sis...sentap yg teramat nampak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
baca .. baca komen ..
mata sentiasa tertarik dengan komen @Muntz @chazey @cmf_shalom dan @kak_sue
tetiba baca komen sekngucing
palpatine? 
menda tu ....
rupa2 nya ..
pakcik google bgtau ni
edit
credit to :
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Palpatine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
u kena bg backup utk point yg u sebut ni. duti eksais, o & g revenue semua tu u belum masuk lg operational cost/belanja mengurus dia. pernah tengok x bp byk belanja mengurus kerajaan persekutuan? ok fine, u nak semua revenue to di bg kpd sarawak, u ambik sekali la belanja mengurus dia. gaji2 staff government tu semua kerajaan negeri bayar la. 5% royalti o & g tu net amt dpt kpd sarawak tanpa buat apa2 ok. u mn blh tuding jari salahkan kerajaan persekutuan 100% utk majukan negeri sarawak (sama jugak dgn negeri2 lain, kalau kerajaan negeri x pandai nak tadbir urus kewangan negeri x blh la nak salah 100% kerajaan persekutuan). kerajaan negeri buat apa? xde hasil? sarawak xde sumber hasil? tengok penang, dpd kerajaan bn sampai la kerajaan pakatan sekarang, apa sumber hasil je yg diorang ada, elok je generate income. n utk sarawak kan, lebihan hasil negeri terkumpul sebelum najib jd pm 6.7b++, lebihan rizab termasuk pemberian kerajaan persekutuan 12b++. tanya la kerajaan negeri sarawak knp x ambik sikit dpd lebihan tu utk upgrade apa yg patut di sarawak tu. ya, mahathir mungkin anaktirikan sabah sarawak n najib bg perhatian lebih utk sabah sarawak tp utk salahkan kerajaan persekutuan 100% mmg mengarut la.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sentimen pun still ada point. sampai sekarang xde yg dpt jwb knp tun mahathir anaktirikan sabah sarawak. najib masa awal2 jd pm dia pusing 1 malaysia kan nak tau apa yg rakyat malaysia ni nak, tun det ada buat mcm tu? kalau tanya sy la kan, beza dua2 org ni, najib suka mendengar tp tun det suka org degar ckp dia n tun det ni pendendam plus ego tinggi melangit, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mahathir lakon utk dpt belas kasihan?
aku tepuk tangan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abdul Ghapur pun not bad. I like him. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by Muntz at 21-3-2016 05:47 PM
Why we vote BN? OK, I answer for Sarawak only for this time ya. 
BN in Sarawak consists of all LOCAL parties, all parties under BN in Sarawak is purely local, made in Sarawak. They have been long grassrooted to the core of Sarawakians. While PR or PH (whatever names u want to call them), are all imported parties from Malaya. PAS, DAP, PKR, PAN.. all are Malayan parties. How can we be assured when we vote for them, Sarawakian will get what they want from Federal? Don't have to foresee future lah, just see who's their CWC. Sarawakian only one person each inside their CWC, both DAP and PKR. PAS and PAN - nil. If CWC already show bias or discrimination towards Sarawak, how can they steer Sarawak later on under Federal? 
Secondly, ok.. Sarawak has never been governed by pacts other than BN. Sabah did, once. U can try to read how Sabah fare under Malayan rule when they chose oppo pact to be the govt. Federal has abused darurat acts, mass import of Indonesian & Filipino for Project IC until they become majority now. Are Sabahan at fault? If u say yes.. yes, they didn't vote for BN, but they suffered too! So which one is better? That is why Sarawakians learnt a lot from Sabahans when it comes to political/relationship with Malaya.
So we with Malaya is like mentimun dengan durian.. kena golek pun kena, digolek pun kena. What choice do we have left? We vote for opposition to rule, federal will abuse us. We vote BN to rule, they also discriminate us. So the best choice for now - YUP, vote BN. And now we r at better position because now most Malayans have sided with opposition with remaining few still clinging to UMNO. The advantage is now on us. We have that bargaining power. We somehow have to grab their balls, so they will follow what we want.. it's what smart politicking is all about. That is why, we still have our many rights secured due to this. And many more coming afterward, if Sarawakian still choose BN. Last time, we don't have it because most Malayans are with BN (during Mahathir time), so they r like don't need our votes that much. But now.. YES! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dr mahathir
mau jadi apa? hantu atau buaya? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ko bandingkan Penang dgn Sarawak. Wow! Penang tu Kuching lagi besar kut. Dengan populasi lebih 1.5 juta, tapi tanah cuma besar salah sebuah daerah kecil di Sarawak, how can u compare? Ko develop Sarawak takleh ko samakan ko develop Penang, patutnya ko compare cmner Federal develop Malaya berbanding develop Sarawak. Sbb tu Sarawak request 20% - both BN dan PR/PH buat tuntutan sama. Bukan besar pun. Sarawak nie ko kena pegi ke kawasan pedalaman, walaupun takleh nak develop sangat, tapi at least ada kemudahan asas. Diorg tanak mcm2 pun, janji ada jalan, elektrik, air, telefon, cukop. Pegi jer lah kat kampung2 merata ceruk di Malaya, ko akan nampak jalan semua proper, air ada, elektrik ada, walaupun yg tinggal situ cuma ntah berapa isi rumah jah. Kenapa benda camtu takleh apply kat Sarawak? Hanya sbb cost dia byk maka tak perlu buat gitu? Banding dgn bandar pun dah cukop. Kat Malaya, bandar mcm Kuantan pun ada highway antara bandar. Kenapa Kuching takleh ada? Kalau dari Miri masuk Brunei, ko akan tengok sendiri mcm mana Brunei nyer infrastruktur. Jauh beza. Kita tengok pun malu. Sedangkan boleh jer federal buat macam tu kat Sarawak. Janji bagi cukup duit jer. Mintak 20% pun liat. Pastu salahkan kerajaan negeri pulak taknak tolong develop. Camner kerajaan negeri nak develop kalau peruntukan tu ciput? Nak harap duit lesen berjudi mana cukup nak develop seluruh Sarawak? Adoiyai..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heshe tue maksum, uols. Kau jangan tak tau die tak penah salah, mamak never wrong hoccey 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I lagi suka kitorang jadik negara pertanian jer, Sue. Tak suke lar banyak2 bangunan neh, PATI pun banyak mak geliii tak semenggahhh  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
badaksumbu replied at 20-3-2016 07:03 AM
u kena bg backup utk point yg u sebut ni. duti eksais, o & g revenue semua tu u belum masuk lg ope ...
Zaman dulu memang sabahsarawak dibiarkan mundur supaya senang hasil bumi diambil. Tektik yang sama digunakan kepada kebanyakan negara-negara mundur. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bedah.Cun replied at 21-3-2016 06:25 PM
I lagi suka kitorang jadik negara pertanian jer, Sue. Tak suke lar banyak2 bangunan neh, PATI pun ...
Betul tu, negara berasaskan pertanian lebih baik. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suspek diorang takut kau sume jadi separate dari federal so diornag tak boleh nak control korang. Even skang pun diorang xceli takleh nak directly kontrol korang
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
peruntukan dpd kerajaan pusat tu dah cerita lain, kalau betul kerajaan pusat bg sikit peruntukan tanpa sbb mmg salah kerajaan pusat la. sekarang yg ditanya rizab dpd hasil negeri yg berbelas2 bilion zaman taib mahmud tu knp x ambik sikit utk upgrade apa yg patut. rizab tu hasil cukai tanah, cukai balak semua yg kerajaan pusat x blh masuk campur. kumpul byk2 nak buat apa? nak ikut contoh tski? ke hulu ke hilir canang rizab selangor berbilion2, jln berlubang sana sini.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is only my opinion ya.....after reading what you wrote.
1. You all choose BN cause in sarawak it was represented by the local. Whereas Opposition is imported from tanah melayu. Akak rasa ini tak salah.
But ................Is the local representative/leader you have choosen take good care /welfare of sarawak people?
Or they just bow to Mathathir....or even sapu the forest makan sendiri?
You all blame Tun M 100% on what sarawak/sanah is today. Im trying to say....Mathathir cannot be blamed 100%....maybe 60%.
The other 40% the blame shud goes to your local representative that you have choosen.
How long Tun Mustapha govern you all?
2. Sabah did, once. U can try to read how Sabah fare under Malayan rule when they chose oppo pact to be the govt. Federal has abused darurat acts, mass import of Indonesian & Filipino for Project IC until they become majority now. Are Sabahan at fault?
Ok I got it......Sama lah dgn nasib Kelantan. kena punish dgn Federal.
Sabahan not at fault....its the leader at fault. The leader choosen by Sabahan belum ready to manage a country.
Its not easy to get a good leader.
Now I know why you all hated Tun M so much.....
Thanks for your explanation.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by chazey at 22-3-2016 02:54 PM
Modngengade replied at 19-3-2016 11:34 PM
Amboi sis...sentap yg teramat nampak
Haruslah. Nama jah tinggal di hutan bandar tapi lagi bodoh dari aku yang dari kecik tinggal di pedalaman hutan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bedah.Cun replied at 21-3-2016 06:21 PM
Pati Paki Pashtoon bagai tue sume masuk ke Malaya guna IC dari Sabah tue lar, noks. Diorang datang ...
Anak2 lokal Sabahan kacuk Paki ni cantik2, hensem2, tapi bukan book smart. Namun deyol excellent sebagai ahli politik () atau bisnis man/woman. Very street smart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 19-3-2016 07:49 PM
