|
|
|
uk band lagi best kot dari us |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Takder poll ker??
Aper pon, aku rasa UK band ada sikit creative... tapi musically, US bands are a lot better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aku ske both us n uk bands....but since us lagi besa dr uk, probability utk dpt excellent sounding bands mmg tinggi arr... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i like UK, but took too long to produce an album... US bands are more productive  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #20 Ustaz_SUFI's post
=[. oh well, to each their own.
and singalegna, it's about the quality for me, nevermind the time taken to produce an album, its worth the wait as you listen to the beautiful songs that have been taken months to make. the songs which have been edited endlessly to it's perfection. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US bands = POWER, MUSICAL STRENGTH
UK bands = CREATIVITY, SOUL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US bands tend to sound alike, IMHO... the music, the vocalists' style of singing... cam lebih kurang je. tgk baper byk nirvana-wannabe mase zaman2 grunge dulu...
UK bands, they have their own sounds. cthnya mase british invasion dulu, spearheaded by the likes of oasis and blur, musically wise dorang adelah berbeza.
so UK produced better bands compared to US walaupon US bands mungkin lebih masyukk dari UK bands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us band kebanyakannya bermuzik tipikal.
uk band banyak kepelbagaian dalam muzik mereka.
nampak persamaannya macam malaysian nye mainstream muzik dengan indon nye mainstream muzik skarang. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aku tak kisah memana...asal lagu dia aku suka..layannnnn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nfmbf This user has been deleted
|
|
US lar.haha. kalau UK, mellow2 cket lar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 5-8-2007 11:18 AM
