View: 3742|Reply: 11
|
Antara Aruba & Ruckus?.. mane controller lagi baik
[Copy link]
|
|
Post Last Edit by metalique at 3-7-2011 23:44
salam all, aku skg ni tgh buat penilaian teknikal tuk opis... antara Aruba Controller dgn Ruckus Controller??.. mane korang prefer ??...
pastu nak mintak pendapat ttg blue coat content filter skali.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alamak... x de otai network nak jawab ke ??.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aruba ak xpenah pakai lagi...tp ak rase ruckus better... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drp blue coat ak suggest ko pakai palo alto. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok.. thanks for feedback... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruckus better on coverage..aruba better on security but..not all free on aruba...for me, buy ruckus..for better coverage..and Cisco always the best one.dah beli ke belum?hehe..meh aku buat POC nak? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dh buat perolehan pun.. tapi x dapek lg... Aruba 105 for AP.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
otai network yg level mana ko cari?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
helo!
just curious, so you are using Aruba or Ruckus right now? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UM dahulu purnah guna Aruba |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skg ni pakai aruba 3200 dgn 105 AP.... same goes to KPT my HQ.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alamak. ye ker bro metallique . tapi based aku pnyer experience..signal Ruckus much better than Aruba, even signal Cisco much better than Aruba. tapi bila kita concern pasal security, customer slalunya akan pilih Aruba. Tapi,bila security di enforce dalam satu box,dia akan buat performance wireless to downgrading. it is better to have 3rd party security appliance. tapi, alang-alang dah beli, utiliza sajee apa yang ada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|