video ppuan yg menagku kena romen dek DSAI pon dia tak jumpa lagi latu..
kalau tak mesti dia dah paste kat sini sesambil berbangga kununnya dia dah JUMPA BUKTI TERBARU
Originally posted by TENOK at 5-7-2008 09:49 AM
apa punya bangang la newbie ni.! dah tak de modal tu tak payah la bukak thread baru.
newbie!newbiw! apsal la bangang.
ni musti baru lepas baligh.... ko mimpi ke dapat periyed?
org lain sudah ke depan, ko masih lagi tehegeh hegeh ......
otak umno memang mcm tu... sentiasa cetek iq nya.....
itu pengakuan sukma dalam tahanan ....semasa dalam penjara....dalam keadaan mental dan fizikal didera....diugut dan juga dijanjikan pelbagai harapan.....
cuba tengok pula video dalam link dibawah ini....pengakuan semasa sukma sudah bebas....tiada tekanan seperti semasa dalam penjara....tiada paksaan dan ugutan bagai....
Originally posted by zyarunzurro at 5-7-2008 10:01 AM
itu pengakuan sukma dalam tahanan ....semasa dalam penjara....dalam keadaan mental dan fizikal didera....diugut dan juga dijanjikan pelbagai harapan.....
cuba tengok pula video dalam link dibawah ini....pengakuan semasa sukma sudah bebas....tiada tekanan seperti semasa dalam penjara....tiada paksaan dan ugutan bagai....
PUTRAJAYA - The Federal Court today freed Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, setting aside the former Deputy Prime Minister's conviction and nine-year jail sentence for sodomy handed down in August 2000. In amajority decision, Judges Datuk Abdul Hamid Mohamed and Tengku Datuk Baharuddin Shah Tengku Mahmud also overturned the conviction of Anwar's adopted brother, Sukma Dermawan Sasmitaat Madja. Anwar and Sukma had been found guilty of sodomising Azizan Abu Bakar, the former driver of Anwar's wife, Datin Seri Dr Wan Azizah Ismail. However, the third member of the panel, Federal Court judge Datin Paduka Rahmah Hussain,dissented. Anwar, who was in a wheelchair and wearing neck and backbraces for an old back injury, was calm as Hamid began delivering his written judgment to a packed courtroom about 9.15am. When Hamid pronounced his freedom, Anwar raised his hand and said: "Yang Arif, thank you and may God bless you." Anwar's lawyer Zulkifli Nordin leftthe courtroom to deliver the verdict to waiting friends and supporters. An excited hubbub in the public gallery and outside the courtroom crescendoed into near-chaos for a moment, but the situation calmed down. In the written judgment, Hamid said the High Court should havea cquitted Anwar and Sukma instead of calling for their defence.
Hamid said the judges did find evidence that both Anwar and Sukma were involved in homosexual activities
and are inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen but our decision must be based only on the evidence adduced and nothing else. "The prosecution, Hamid said, had not proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and some parts of Azizan's evidence were inconsistent. In her dissenting judgment, Rahmah disagreed that Azizan had been an unreliable witness.
Contending that Azizan's testimony was intact and credible, she said the trial judge had been correct in finding Anwar and Sukma guilty of sodomy.
Although the defence had contended there were contradictions in Azizan's testimony, such as on the dates of the alleged offences, Rahmah said they had not made him an unreliable witness or rendered his evidence unacceptable. She said in sexual offences, the essential ingredientswere the sexual act and the identity of the offender, not the date.
[ Last edited by tumpanglalu74 at 5-7-2008 10:41 AM ]
Apa yang biasa ?
Memang Sukma biasa cakap camtu ke ?
ish...nko ni pun....percakapan ni biasa la....ia cuma sebagai alat.....sukma tu owang indon...lagi la pulak...sama ngan melayu...cina atau india...owang UK pun tak sama style cakap ngan US....owang kelantan pun tak sama cakap ngan owang kedah....apa nak sebok sangat pasal mender tuh.....ia cuma sebagai alat.....
Originally posted by tumpanglalu74 at 5-7-2008 10:38 AM
PUTRAJAYA - The Federal Court today freed Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, setting aside the former Deputy Prime Minister's conviction and nine-year jail sentence for sodomy handed down in August 2000. ...
mengapa hakim hakim berkenaan mengulas sedemikian rupa....?....
ini adalah kerana hakim hakim tersebut membuat penggulungan berdasarkan"perbicaraan yg telah dijalankan oleh Ariffin Jaka"....yang banyak dipertikaikan oleh NGO dan badan kehakiman serta banyak negara negara luar....
Hakim hakim tersebut bukannya mengadakan perbicaraan yg baru .... tetapi mereka terpaksa mengulas"skrip perbicaraan" ariffin jaka yg amat dipertikaikan tersebut....hakim hakim tersebut tiada pilihan lain selain menggunakan skrip yg telah disediakan oleh ariffinjaka sebelumnya....
walaubagaimanapun DSAI tetap dibebaskan walaupun menggunakan "isi perbicaraan" yg amat dipertikaikan tersebut.....