|
View: 3272|Reply: 6
|
what are leaders scared of this dubious claim?
[Copy link]
|
|
|
wake up Malaysian leaders!!!!!
The dream of 'Claim on Sabah' undermined by own thoughts, deeds and neglects
Everyone is worried needlessly when the claim on Sabah by the Philippines is mentioned every now and then. It must have driven quite a lot of people mad that they decided to migrate even without knowing the full impact of such claim which I believe is dubious. Just because it is very much in the minds of many and repeated so often that it becomes so real but it is still a deception engineered with hidden agenda by various quarters on our soil and across the Sulu Sea.
So we must make every concerted effort to put the issue to rest hence removing this scourge of more than 4 decades. Nothing much has been done by the Federal Government for reasons best known to them to resolve this long standing thorn in the flesh. While there are lots of propaganda from the press across the Sulu seas for decades for agitation, there is comparative much less counter moves on our side towards that claim which is actually dead. Why should we be less active on this issue? Many have unfortunately acted on the lack of knowledge or misrepresentation.
Some may think they have a lot to gain from such claim as regularly revived over a fickle of irritation coming from Sabah whenever illegal people from the Philippines are arrested to be deported home.
As we search for facts from written materials in the libraries and the archives of the internet, many fresh ideas come to mind. How can this claim be valid when there are some fundamental questions to some key issues like locus standi to pursue the case, the definition of the word 'padjak', the real owner of part of North Borneo, the sovereignty of the area at the time when the agreement was signed when there is a complicity of claims by various parties (L R Wright), the inter twinning events since 1878 till 1962 to be analysed plus the amount of RM5,000 paid since 1878. This letter is not going into details of that but hopefully a book of substantial size would be ready soon.
The whole scenario of Malaysia to be in 1962 with North Borneo (now Sabah) as part of the new nation did create an unusual history for the region. Is there any special reason for such hoo haa over the new Federation? Whatever that may be, much unpleasantness had occurred surrounding the announcement of the new nation and delayed with the intervention of the United Nations on the requests of Philippines and Indonesia.
The new nation was born but not without any critical challenges as Philippines revived the dormant claim on North Borneo and Indonesia declared a military Confrontation to crush Malaysia.
Was it so many coincidences that there were many sudden changes to the leaders in the region who had been involved with the birth of the new nation? Diosdado Macapagal (1961-65) lost his Presidency in the Philippines within a few years. The Sultan of Brunei also abdicated in favour of his teenage prince in 1965. Sukarno lost his power in 1965 and with that the Confrontation ceased. The founder of Malaysia also was forced out of power in 1970 after the race riots in the young nation. Singapore also was forced out in 1965 for a sort of power struggle. Do we learn anything from the omen of such sudden changes affecting Sabah? Is that not good enough to send a vivid message of the futility of disturbing the destiny of the people of Sabah?
That is only the beginning of sorrows as much more tribulations occurred when manipulations over the dubious claim were perpetuated. A long list of complicity and complexity as driven by the dubious claim can be made out after going through the writings available in the Internet. We can observe how a devious deception as perpetuated with criminal intent can give rise to all sort of woes with many deaths known and unknown. Amina Rasul a prominent writer and Senator writing in the Manila times described "The history of the Sabah Claim is a fascinating one complete with intrigue, rebellion, palace maneuverings, massacre, and greed." (Manila Times May 14, 2006). I would add that there are also many hidden agenda with deception and manipulation resulting in many victims of circumstances both in Sabah and land across the Sulu Sea.
A few major ones of the multi facets of conflict following the birth of the challenged nation, there must some very expensive lessons for all in the region and yet there is no end to the dubious claim which should be left as a historic item. God knows how many more unreported insidious costly efforts have been deployed with Sabah as the punching bag.
The obvious ones as reported regularly are
1) Tensions flared again in the early 1970s when the largest Muslim separatist group in the Philippines, the Moro National Liberation Front, began to receive material support from the Sabah chief minister, Tun Mustapha. Only after his electoral defeat in 1976 did Malaysian aid to the Philippine rebels cease and bilateral relations begin to improve. (Sabah dispute - http://www.bookrags.com/Sabah_dispute)
2) The Jabida Massacre in 1968 where it was reported mainly due to the effort of Benigno Aquino. The Massacre was intended to get rid of evidence of the scheme to attack Sabah but the proposed mission failed to move beyond the shore of the Southern Philippines. Could this unwanted exposure be the main excuse that Benigno Aquino met his assassination on Aug. 21, 1983 at the tarmac on return after a self imposed exile?
1
3) Tens of thousands of Moro well trained soldiers in Sabah and elsewhere appeared to have sort of disappeared for whatever reasons and this is obvious very costly lessons for the 'claimants' by using intended force.
4) In the case of Michael Meiring, an American, there were failed schemes arranged in the Philippines to invade Sabah in the period 1990/1991 by mercenaries but after incurring millions US$ of slush funds, Michael himself was self inflicted by a bomb in his hotel room. It is much rumoured that some Sabahans were also involved with that aborted attempts. (US faking terror in Philippines by Craig Hanley)
5) There were always very unhealthy rumours of the much feared Moro Army believed to be in and outside Sabah ready to be in action to enforce the Claim but till today such harmful rumours had arisen from deception. Nevertheless, there have been frightening reports of some people in Sabah linked to the international terror group of Al Qaeda and Abu Sayyap following the arrest of Hambali in 2003. All these terrorising activities have been sort of 'justified' by the dubious claim on Sabah.
6) With such fierce propaganda in the Philippines over the Sabah claim, now it is quite obvious that the internal armed conflict could be engineered by the power so that some groups find the excuse to come to Sabah as refugees as exacerbated by the Jabidah Massacre on youthful Tausags and Samas who 'mutinised'. The arrival of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants including refugees from the Philippines since 1968 have brought much nightmares for Sabah. The Project IC has devastating impacts on the illegal arrivals under a deception of sort and the local people alike.
7) The kidnap of 21 persons in the Sipadan island including foreign tourists was sort of linked to the dormant Claim on 23rd April 2000. There were lots of damaging impact on both sides of the Sulu Sea. In the process of rescue operations conducted in Jolo island, many hundreds of thousand of people were displaced by the military in hot pursuit of the Abu Sayyap kidnappers over a few months.
Perusal of the many pages of the writings by Filipinos, it would give an indication that Sabah is worth a lot of money to them hence that was the impetus for them to pursue the dubious claim for so long. Their hot pursuits so far have already cost them and Sabah tremendous amount of unaccounted losses. So I hope by writing this letter, we should get to grip with the costs likely to accrued to the Filipinos while cooperation with Sabah to resolve this claim can actually minimise the losses on both sides.
As a matter of fact, it is the dubious claim but the Filipinos generally is reluctant to give up with the overpowering propaganda at home that whenever the illegal people are arrested and likely deported, they would likely claim that Sabah belongs to them.
It is ironic that pursuing the dormant claim every now and then may be induced by the dreams of gains when many have already reaped nightmares of losses including human lives (guilty and innocent) piling up on both sides of Sulu sea and beyond in more than four decades. It is indeed an irony that acting on dubious sentiments many have also lost sense of direction so much so that they do not know what they have got themselves entangled with.
(1 of 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 of 2
It may have started with the dubious claim and then many were involved with sort of internal conflict resulting in refugees and illegals going into Sabah and entangled with the dubious citizenship via the Project IC causing much rampage in Sabah.
It is therefore timely that we take cognisance of the fact that dubious claims on Sabah by some pretenders to the throne of Sultanate of Sulu in disarray, are regularly made by them while remaining in Sabah. Malaysians in Sabah have to tolerate them and an irony indeed and injustice at its worst. In a world, where nations are separated by national boundaries, we have to recognise such order. Can such claimants claim Sabah and be justified in their arguments when their people are already all over Sabah and Labuan and into other parts of Malaysia causing much rampage in such process? Even if the claimants think they have a historic right over a piece of land, they are actually claiming much more land than its historic boundary. They have indicated that the claimants want to kick Malaysians out of Sabah into Sarawak. While the dubious claim goes on, their proxies should not be in Sabah but instead the alien people have aggravated their questioned position by not limit themselves within that 'claimed' boundary but roam freely and abusively all over the land below the wind and Labuan and beyond in Malaysia.
Although we have a very long coastline, the Filipino Government should be faulted as a party to the commission of crimes against humanity in Sabah as it does not ever enforce any immigration control at all over its own people to stray into Sabah at ease and involved in many piracies and kidnappings in Sabah soil.
So there is no better time than now that the Filipinos stop their imagined claim on Sabah to avoid any further losses on their side when I had already lodged an official complaint to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the Haque in October 2006. There are still much agitation on the side of Manila to revive the claim currently. Like the case of Sipadan and Ligitan, any action with ICJ would fail because Philippines cannot clear those stumbling hurdles in history. The case before the ICC can cost the Philippines and her agents at least an expected sum of RM40 billions. The only win win situation in the region is for the claim to be buried forever. Unfortunately the Malaysian Government has not made special effort to punch into the deception so far perpetuated by the claimants except avoiding ICJ. We cannot ignore the storms brewing although there had been many intermittent lulls. We need to have a fresh good look hence a bulky book of at a thousand pages is needed.
Joshua Y. C. Kong, Kota Kinabalu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Stop the hurting dubious claim on Sabah"
"Stop the hurting dubious claim on Sabah"
The issues of Project IC and the Claim on Sabah are inseparable.
While others have felt offended by many inaccuracies of the letter titled 'Debate over who comprise the real Sabahans' by Raden Hj Kakung for Sec-Gen, Yayasan Islam Sabah, I quote "The controversy over ICs has arisen from allegations made by a few politicians and writers - including the authors of the three books - that staff of the National Registration Department had issued ICs to illegals or new arrivals." I hope Raden would be more specific about the authors concerned.
Meanwhile in another letter titled "Theory reflects poorly on YIS" by Factual man (DE forum 4th March 2007), it was stated "This is because the western half of Sabah was under the Brunei colonial Government, whereas the eastern half was under the Sulu colonial Government." Is that statement fact or fiction? Did Brunei and Sulu ever have any colonial Governments? It is believed that the whole Borneo Island was once under the sovereignty of Sultan of Brunei.
The second part of the statement is also questionable as this is not true in documentary history. That 'fact' is not supported by document. I hope 'factual man' can present the piece of document to prove that "Sulu colonial government" was ceded the piece of land in North Borneo which has been the unjustified basis for the Claim on Sabah. I know much have been written by some interested parties about the dubious claim based on a piece of document with the word 'padjak' between the Gustavus Baron de Overbeck of Hong Kong and Alfred Dent representing the British company and the Sulu Sultan in January 1878.
While we may query the issue of Sovereignty of the British over North Borneo until 1946, we may have to look at the Sovereignty of the Sulu Sultan over part of North Borneo in 1878. The Sulu Sultan may claim the piece of land as a reward for assisting in a battle between two claimants to the throne of the Sultan of Brunei, where is the piece of document to prove that? Was Sovereignty of the eastern part of Sabah actually transferred over to the Sulu Sultan? Until the Sulu Sultan then had actually taken control (Sovereignty versus claim) over the said territory in the absence of the document of cession, then it was a dubious claim then in 1878. Hence it was deemed an illegal transaction over a piece of claimed land now perpetuated by political agenda with devastation for the genuine people in Sabah since 1963 as Sovereignty of Sabah is now firmly established by the legal local people (Project IC holders excluded) since Independence for 44 years.
Would we acknowledge that the scourge of the claim has been visible in the region with Sabahans bearing the brunt of that dubious claim for four decades? We need to address this scourge now so that real peace can return to the region. All the ingredients of the cl
There were coincidences of many sudden changes to the leaders in the region who had been involved with the birth of the new nation? Diosdado Macapagal (1961-65) lost his Presidency in the Philippines within a few years. The Sultan of Brunei also abdicated in favour of his teenage prince in 1965. Sukarno lost his power in 1965 and with that the Confrontation ceased. The founder of Malaysia also was forced out of power in 1970 after the race riots in the young nation. Singapore also was forced out in 1965 for a sort of power struggle. Do we learn anything from the omen of such sudden changes affecting Sabah? Is that not good enough to send a vivid message of the futility of disturbing the destiny of the people of Sabah?
That is only the beginning of sorrows as much more tribulations occurred when manipulations over the dubious claim were perpetuated. A long list of complicity and complexity as driven by the dubious claim can be made out after going through the writings available in the Internet. We can observe how a devious deception as perpetuated with criminal intent can give rise to all sort of woes with many deaths known and unknown. Amina Rasul a prominent writer and Senator writing in the Manila times described "The history of the Sabah Claim is a fascinating one complete with intrigue, rebellion, palace maneuverings, massacre, and greed." (Manila Times May 14, 2006). I would add that there are also many hidden agenda with deception and manipulation resulting in many victims of circumstances both in Sabah and land across the Sulu Sea.
From the few major ones of conflict following the birth of the challenged nation, there must be some very expensive lessons for all in the region and yet there is no end to the dubious claim which should be left as a historic item. God knows how many more unreported insidious costly efforts have been deployed with Sabah as the punching bag.
Many pages of the writings by Filipinos provide the impression that Sabah is worth a lot of money to them hence that was the impetus for them to pursue the dubious claim for so long. Their hot pursuits so far have already cost them and Sabah tremendous amount of unaccounted losses. So I hope by writing this letter, we should come to grip with the costs likely to accrued to the Filipinos while cooperation with Sabah to resolve this claim can actually minimise the losses on both sides.
As a matter of fact, it is the dubious claim but the Filipinos generally is reluctant to give up with the overpowering propaganda at home that whenever the illegal people are arrested and likely deported, they would likely claim that Sabah belongs to them.
It is ironic that pursuing the dormant claim every now and then may be induced by the dreams of gains when many have already reaped nightmares of losses including human lives (guilty and innocent) piling up on both sides of Sulu sea and beyond in more than four decades. It is indeed an irony that acting on dubious sentiments many have also lost sense of direction so much so that they do not know what they have got themselves entangled with.
It may have started with the dubious claim and then many were involved with sort of internal conflict resulting in refugees and illegals going into Sabah and entangled with the dubious citizenship via the Project IC causing much rampage in Sabah.
It is therefore timely that we take cognisance of the fact that claim on Sabah is dubious by some pretenders to the throne of Sultanate of Sulu in disarray and the Philippines Government. Such claims are regularly made by them while remaining in Sabah. Malaysians in Sabah have to tolerate them with the related criminal abuses and injustice at its worst. In a world, where nations are separated by national boundaries, we have to recognise such order. Can such claimants claim Sabah and be justified in their arguments when their people are already all over Sabah and Labuan and into other parts of Malaysia causing much rampage in such process? Even if the claimants think they have a historic right over a piece of land, they are actually 'trepassing' in land beyond the deemed boundary in 1878. They have indicated that the claimants want to kick Malaysians out of Sabah into Sarawak. While the dubious claim goes on, their proxies should not be in Sabah. Instead such alien people have disregarded the laws and orders of Malaysia especially in Sabah.
Although we have a very long coastline, the Filipino Government should be faulted as a party to the commission of crimes against humanity in Sabah as it does not ever enforce any immigration control at all over its own people to stray into Sabah at ease and involved in many piracies and kidnappings in Sabah soil.
So there is no better time than now that the Filipinos stop their imagined claim on Sabah to avoid any further losses on their side when I had already lodged an official complaint to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the Hague in October 2006. There are still much agitation on the side of Manila to revive the claim currently. Like the case of Sipadan and Ligitan, any action with ICJ would fail because Philippines cannot clear those stumbling hurdles in history. The case before the ICC can cost the Philippines and her agents at least an expected sum of RM40 billions. The only win win situation in the region is for the claim to be buried forever. Unfortunately the Malaysian Government has not made special effort to punch into the deception so far perpetuated by the claimants except avoiding ICJ. We cannot ignore the storms brewing although there had been many intermittent lulls. We need to have a fresh good look hence a bulky book of a thousand pages is needed. Joshua Y. C. Kong, Kota Kinabalu.
p s: I am sieving through up to 10,000 pages of writings to compile a book of a thousand pages and more titled "Challenge over Claim on Sabah -North Borneo".
(also attached is a page of the article - http://www.defendsison.be/pages_php/0303090.php ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Police Report on our security and sovereignty
Police Report on our security and sovereignty- CLAIM ON SABAH / INDONESIA CONFRONTATION 16 March 2007 (English below)
Kami minta Kerajaan kita ambil tindakan dengan segara atas perkara-perkara yang asas iaitu Tuntutan atas Sabah (selalu dihidupkan) dan the Konfrontasi Indonesia (economik dan kelakuan yang tidak diingini termasuk tuntutan Sipadan and Ligitan) yang telah di biarkan oleh Kerajaan berturut-turut selama 44 tahun, Pihak Polis dan Badan Keselamatan ada tangungjawab atas kedua isu mengenalan negara-negara jiran Sabah.
Kita sudah lama tinggal di Sabah melalui zaman yang takutkan, dahsyat, tak harmoni, dan keselamatan sendiri apabila hak asasi manusia kami dilanggarkan semacam senang oleh beberapa pihak dalam sendiri and luar negeri. Kedua isu malangnya telah melahir masaalah besar iaitu "ethnic cleansing" berhubung Projek IC yang berhasilkan "apartheid phenomena" sebagai 'dijatuhkan atau diputarkan' oleh warga yang kurang hak menjadi bumiputra.
Sebab-sebab akal boleh jadi kerana sejarah yang tidak lama apabila Malaysia ditubuhkan pada tahun 1963 dan kita sudah membuang daya upaya supaya dapat mengatasi masalah-masalah luar (iaitu penganasan dan budaya kasar). Kita mengalami banyak kesusahan dan sengsara bagi rakyat tulen tempatan kerana Kerajaan belum ambil tindakan untuk selasai sebab-sebab akal berkenaan.
Sambil Malaysia boleh sangka bahawa Tuntutan atas Sabah oleh Filipin dan Konfrontasi oleh Indonesia adalah tidak relevan, apa kejadian yang kita alami di Sabah vis-a-vis Malaysia boleh di rujuk kepada kedua kejadian yang huduh.
Sungguhpun kita merdeka dengan kedaulatan seperti laku pada 1963, kita sudah malangnya buat bemacam-macam jadinya kita tidak bebas daripada negara jiran. Oleh demikian, bahayanya kita boleh hilang kedaulatan sendiri jikalau kita tidak ambil tindakan yang sewajarnya dengan objektiv dan kerjasamaan dalam era baru di kawasan ini.
Masaalah timbul diantara kumpulan pekerja dan pendatang (sah atau tidak) yang berkenaan, kita perlu menjalankan peraturan yang sewajarnya di tanah air kita kerana banyak kelakuan tidak sah sudah jadi sampai suasana anarki (tanpa Perentah) wujud yang kita harap tidak laku di Sabah.
Kita tahu cabaran-cabaran dan masalah di Sabah berkaitan kedua perkara tetapi tidak apa apa dibuat supaya selasaikannya kecuali nampaknya kita hilang hak kami selama ini kepada negara jiran apabila Perjanjian Malaysia bagi rakyat Sabah di 1963 'dijatuhkan' dalam 44 tahun pura-pura buat di Dewan Undangan Negeri dan di Pilihan Raya yang kurang sah.
Kami sertai dengan laporan ini beberapa muka surat bagi pembangunan dahsyat berkaitan kedua perkara dalam appendis A dan perkara lapan belas bagi siasatan lanjutan (ms ) dengan dokumen di ms . Laporan ini akan di hantar ke Suhakam, Dewan Rakyat, Dewan Undangan Negeri Sabah dan Kerajaan Persekutuan.
ENGLISH version
We demand the Government of the day to address the pressing fundamental issues namely the Claim on Sabah (regularly revived) and the Indonesian Confrontation (economic and other mutated ugly incidents including that of Sipadan and Ligitan) so often neglected by successive Governments for 44 years. The Police and the security forces have vested interests in the two major issues arising from Sabah's closest neighbours.
(page 1 of 2)Police Report on our security and sovereignty- CLAIM ON SABAH / INDONESIA CONFRONTATION 16 March 2007 (cont'd)We have been living in Sabah through a great deal of fear, danger, disharmony and personal safety when our human rights have been violated so easily from within and without. The two issues have unfortunately given birth to 'ethnic cleansing' in collaboration with the Project IC resulting in 'apartheid phenomenon' as distorted by dubious citizens especially unqualified bumiputra.
The root causes can be attributed to recent history when Malaysia came into existence in 1963 and we have diverted much of our resources to deal with imported problems (gangsterism and lawless culture). We still encounter sufferings for our local genuine people as the Government has not dealt with the underlying root causes.
While Malaysia can assume that the Claim on Sabah by the Philippines and Confrontation by Indonesia are irrelevant, what we go through in Sabah vis-a-vis Malaysia can be identified to those two ugly historic events.
While we may be independent as far as sovereignty is concerned determined in 1963, we have made ourselves dependent on our neighbours at our own security peril and such peril can mean that we may lose our sovereignty if we do not deal with them objectively and mutually in an era of global cooperation in the region.
While grievances prevail as far as workers and migrants (legal and illegal) are concerned, we need to have an orderly conduct of our rights in our homeland in the proper perspectives otherwise the already prevailing 'illegalities" aplenty in all areas would lead to anarchy, the least we would like that to happen in Sabah.
We are all aware of the challenges and the inherent problems in Sabah over these two major issues but nothing much is done to resolve them except that we are losing our rights over the years to our neighbours when the intention of the Malaysia Agreement for the people in Sabah in 1963 is much downgraded for 44 years pretentiously via the State Assembly and the dubious Ballot box repeatedly.
We append with this report a few pages of the frightening developments arising from the two issues in appendix A and 18 items identified for probe (page ) supported by pages .
This report would be submitted to the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia, the Parliament, the State Legislative Assembly and the Federal Government.
Datuk Patrick Sindu
President , CASH
Kong Yun Chee @Joshua,
Deputy President, CASH
Hashima bte Hasbullah
Secretary-General CASH
(NB: This English Version is the basis of this report) jkong823@tm.net.my and justknock7@pd.jaring.my(page 2 of 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DUBIOUS claim by Sulu Sultan
JK's Digest No. 29 of March 2007 (55 of 2007) Watershed for Sabah once truly independent by its own.
That was before the DUBIOUS claim by Sulu Sultan in 1878.
North Borneo was once no man's land, as it was part of Borneo once sort of ruled by
the Sultan of Brunei. Actually nobody has sovereignty over the total area of North Borneo.
Those people only ruled over the rivers and the riverine land.
Then the British was given the land on the west coast of North Borneo by the Sultan of Brunei.
The Sulu Sultan claimed the land on the eastern part of North Borneo but no proof with any document.
The Sulu Sultan never ruled over the said land but soon gave it away to the Dent and Overbeck.
Since 1881, that was the threshold of great times for North Borneo now Sabah. Sabah did celebrate 100 years of what in 1991 I do not know. A rozak I would say.
Then in 1963 we were truly independent for 16 short days and then the plunge into turmoil on 16th September 1963 , that is when we lost our independence in the true sense of that word.
Like the WWII was the watershed for a change of the political and economical feature in the third world, (young new independent nations followed) and War with Argentina over Falkland - an Island there was the watershed for Margaret Thather's hold of power in Great Britain (DE 31/3/2007), in Sabah we are also past the watershed of power abuses for 44 years with the breach of Malaysia Agreement now coming into reality. The reality is the independence of Sabah yet again as no one as proven in history can hold Sabah for much longer.
The most celebrated birthdays in public since 2003 of the Chief Minister of Sabah in Datuk Musa Aman (Khan) (whoever drop the surname is divinely illegal) and corruption reports are the final lapse of the watershed for Sabah for a total change away from Federalism since 1963. With the ACA DG not renewed, MAK is next to follow suit.
JUSTICE FOR SABAH by Sabahans only.
Illegal Governments must go NOW.
I am ready to takeover the reign in Sabah.
Joshua Kong (proponent of MIGS and WON)
http://mega-icc-group-sabah-migs.blogspot.com/ http://won-borneo.blogspot.com/
Latest Book: Biodiversity Challenge-Haze Health Hell ISBN983-2653-24-X
Author of New Wealth Order, EPIC of Sabah, FIRE, Sabah Wealth - image of woods power,
EPIC of Sabah - 2nd Edition, Paper to Parliamentary Select Committee on Unity and National Service.
EPIC of Sabah - 3rd Ed., WATER, A tussle in biodiversity of two liquids - palm oil and water,
Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia in 1963, A Paper to Parliamentary Select Committee on Integrity (2006).
http://www.e-borneo.com/col/jkong/
__._,_.___ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Category: Belia & Informasi
|
Post time 11-2-2007 05:21 PM
变色卡
Author
