|
|
P.R.C China PLA & PAP (Police) Gallery and Discussion
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Persoalannya sekarang adakah China berupaya menghasilkan radar AESAnya sendiri setanding atau lebih ...
areguard Post at 13-1-2011 21:53 
sekalipun asalnya diorang copy paste teknologi russia dan barat,
melihat kepada banyaknya blue print dan prototaip sistem
radar dan enjin yg dalam proses kajian dan pembangunan, rasanya
akan tiba masanya china dapat samai keupayaan AESA asal, malah
mungkin jauh lebih baik.
kepesatan pembangunan bidang ketenteraan china ketika ini
seolah2 mengulangi sejarah militari jepun sebelum perang dunia kedua dahulu.
amat menarik untuk diperhatikan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 461# d'zeck
China seperti mengikut jejak langkah Jepun dalam meniti learning curve technology development..mula2 copy paste model org lain, improve the copy paste model, spin off other products from original mould/model, next step innovate and invent via R&D..frontier research. dengan berbekalkan dana yg melimpah dari ekonomi yang semakin hangat tak hairan China boleh mencapai parity keupayaan barat dalam masa terdekat ni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stealth jet team proves its metal
Stephen Chen
Jan 15, 2011 SCMP.com
Metallurgist Shi Changxu won a top national science award yesterday for his contribution to the development of high-performance jet engines - three days after the first public test flight of the mainland's J-20 stealth fighter plane.
Professor Shi, former director of the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Metal Research in Shenyang, developed several families of top-secret, heat-resistant alloys, according to mainland scientists working on jet engines.
The secret alloys were developed decades ago, but because jet engine metals take a long time to test, Shi's alloys have only recently begun to be used in the mainland's jet engines.
In 1955, Shi left his teaching post at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and boarded a ship for the East. He was one of 30 or so Chinese scientists held by the United States government to prevent them from returning to communist China. Shi left the US about the same time as Qian Xuesen, a rocket scientist from the California Institute of Technology, who later founded the Chinese space programme.
After he landed in Shanghai, Shi was immediately sent to Shenyang, a heavy industry base in the northeast province of Liaoning, to boost steel production. Beijing's relationship with Moscow then soured rapidly and the Russians stopped helping their old ally develop fighter jets. The military turned to Shi for help.
With hard work, genius and luck, Shi not only came up with the required alloys using the traditional approach he learned in the West, but also devised something entirely new.
The laboratory performance of the new alloys was so good that no one dared to use them. For safety concerns, plane designers stuck with traditional alloys for China's mass-produced jet engines, whose performance lagged significantly behind their overseas counterparts.
Shi's alloys then began a long march for industrial acceptance. Only recently, with their application in some of the mainland's most advanced fighter jets such as the J-20, have designers fully accepted them.
Professor Zhang Lanting, from the school of materials science and engineering at Shanghai Jiaotong University, said the mainland's aviation material science sector had been waiting too long for this award.
Some people thought China did not have the materials to make high-performance jet engines, but they were wrong, Zhang said.
" The fact is, we have lots of top-quality materials, but to convince plane designers to use them we need to test it for decades - normally 30 years - for absolute safety," he said. " Within 10 years Chinese engines will begin to replace foreign ones in the civilian sector. In the military sector the replacement has already begun. "
Professor Wu Suojun, a specialist in new materials at Beihang University, China's top aviation research institute, said the mainland was quickly narrowing the technological gap with the world's leading engine makers.
" With the successful test flight of the J-20 and other new planes, it is time to reward the heroes behind the scenes, " Wu said.
Sources : http://www.scmp.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chengdu J-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dia tak pakai sukhoi or mig ke utk aircraft carrier dia yg baru siap? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nanchang Q-5D
Hongdu Q-5D - An attack variant, developed at Hongdu, with ALR-1 Laser rangefinder/Marked Target seeker and possibly LLLTV/FLIR vision systems for a day/night capability. Other improvements include Head Up Display, GPS Rx, INS, TACAN, and chaff/flare dispensers. Weapons capability include the Chinese LS-500J laser-guided glide bombs with a 12 km range.
Nanchang Q-5D - (Dian - electronic intelligence) An ELINT platform confusingly given the same designation as the Q-5D attack aircraft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China to Pirates: All Your Base Are Belong to Us
Just how hated are the pirates of Somalia ? This much: China’s top general is suggesting that the rest of the world put aside their differences, and team up to launch amphibious assaults on the pirates’ onshore havens.
In comments at the National Defense University yesterday, General Chen Bingde, the chief of general staff of China’s People’s Liberation Army, called for military action against Somali pirate bosses on land, not just against their minions at sea.
“ For counter-piracy campaigns to be effective, we should probably move beyond the ocean and crash their bases on the land, ” Reuters quoted Gen Bingde as saying.
That’s a much more aggressive take on piracy than we heard out of China in March. At that time, its permanent representative to the United Nations used a much more anodyne phrasing of the land-based approach, arguing for addressing it with “ political, economic and judicial means. ”
It’s also not the kind of statement the world is used to hearing from China in general.
Ever conscious of “ national sovereignty, ” China is often heard condemning military attacks rather than gunning for them. It has criticized the attacks on Libya (although they chose to abstain from a UN Security Council vote permitting them), the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden and the war in Iraq.
But piracy has a way of annoying countries into action. Like other rising economic and naval powers, China has been prompted to take on increasingly aggressive military measures as Somali pirates have menaced its merchant fleet in the Indian Ocean. In 2008, it sent a task force of warships to the waters off the Somali coast, marking its first deployment of naval power far away from its shores. Since then, China has conducted convoys to protect its shipping. Attacks still happen, though and Somali pirates are currently holding a number of Chinese nationals captured in various hijackings.
Attacks on land ports come with risks, however. Direct strikes could complicate Somalia’s battle against Islamist militants. And attempts to use private security-backed militias as proxies against pirates haven’t produced much results, either.
Danger Room What's Next in National Security
Previous post
Next post
China to Pirates: All Your Base Are Belong to Us
* By Adam Rawnsley Email Author
* May 19, 2011 |
* 1:19 pm |
* Categories: Terrorists, Guerillas, Pirates
*
Just how hated are the pirates of Somalia? This much: China’s top general is suggesting that the rest of the world put aside their differences, and team up to launch amphibious assaults on the pirates’ onshore havens.
In comments at the National Defense University yesterday, General Chen Bingde, the chief of general staff of China’s People’s Liberation Army, called for military action against Somali pirate bosses on land, not just against their minions at sea.
“For counter-piracy campaigns to be effective, we should probably move beyond the ocean and crash their bases on the land,” Reuters quoted Gen Bingde as saying.
That’s a much more aggressive take on piracy than we heard out of China in March. At that time, its permanent representative to the United Nations used a much more anodyne phrasing of the land-based approach, arguing for addressing it with “political, economic and judicial means.”
It’s also not the kind of statement the world is used to hearing from China in general.
Ever conscious of “national sovereignty,” China is often heard condemning military attacks rather than gunning for them. It has criticized the attacks on Libya (although they chose to abstain from a UN Security Council vote permitting them), the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden and the war in Iraq.
But piracy has a way of annoying countries into action. Like other rising economic and naval powers, China has been prompted to take on increasingly aggressive military measures as Somali pirates have menaced its merchant fleet in the Indian Ocean. In 2008, it sent a task force of warships to the waters off the Somali coast, marking its first deployment of naval power far away from its shores. Since then, China has conducted convoys to protect its shipping. Attacks still happen, though and Somali pirates are currently holding a number of Chinese nationals captured in various hijackings.
Attacks on land ports come with risks, however. Direct strikes could complicate Somalia’s battle against Islamist militants. And attempts to use private security-backed militias as proxies against pirates haven’t produced much results, either.
Whether or not it’s a good idea, China’s certainly not alone in floating the idea of attacking pirate hangouts on land, as the Wall Street Journal’s (and Danger Room alum) Nathan Hodge notes. French commandos have chased down and captured on land some of the pirates responsible for the hijacking of the Le Ponant. And the U.S. seems to be keen on the idea, too. In March, testifying before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton unloaded her frustration with the current state of counter-piracy operations. Urging more military action, she said “ its hard to imagine that we’re going to be able to resolve this until we go after their land-based ports. ”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amerika,russia dan china masing2 dah ada pesawat stealth, ok lah tu masing2 kuasa besar. namun yang paling merisaukan apabila pesawat jsf memasuki inventori rsaf 2,3 tahun lagi. mampu atau tidak malaysia hadapi ancaman dari singapore????
Jangan banding kemampuan perbelanjaan pertahanan SG dengan MY. Jauh langit dari bumi.
Apa pun, tunggu perkembangan PAK-FA. Sebab ikut tradisi pembelian sejak 1990s & mid 2000s, kita dah start berkiblat ke Russia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
maybe it's time for MAF to consider Chinese-made hardwares..in case PAK FA lambat lagi operational
areguard Post at 13-1-2011 10:04 
Biar PAK-FA lambat, asal selamat. Mende2 defence development & procurement ni mana boleh jadi rush job. Even Russia takes it slow & steady dalam R&D PAK-FA.
Mende2 dari PRC memang meragukan. Sure, Bangladesh / Pakistan / Sri Lanka serta sebahagian negara Afrika beli produk militer PRC, tapi beggars can't be too choosy. In case of Pakistan, sebab diorg punya industri pertahanan ada J/V dengan PRC, lagipun nak bergasak dengan India .... dua2 negara ni still thinks war in WW2 analogy ... numerical superiority vs numerical superiority.
Kalau pertahanan kita level Myanmar atau Laos atau paling cikai pun Filipina, memang bersyukur sangat2 la dapat beli aset militer PRC, asal hibah sekalipun. Tapi kita dah lepas pun level tu ... dah terkehadapan, nak sprint tahap negara maju, memang tak terhingin nye de ngan produk militer PRC ..... unless kita beli depa punya missile-tech, reverse-engineered, & wallah, made in MY! Itu haku teramat setuju bebenor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dulu lg aku promote chinese made hardwares ni.......ramai yg kata x bagus siap bagi contoh thailand punye tank retak la, hull kapal perang x suit dgn system la.....tu mungkin 10-20 tahun dulu, sekarang aku tgk china byk improvement,bro cuba ko baca tempur november punya isu.....memang mengancam diaorg punye senjata yg dibuat sundri tu......tp certain2 tu copy paste US la...
Aku pun cenggitu juga .... tapi Thailand dah stop beli produk militer PRC sebab diorang ada choice maaa ....
Tapi, dalam byk2 produk militer PRC, aku tak berapa nak tergiur maupun terliur sangat sebab bese2 je. Yang buat aku kemaruk hanya missile tech depa ... itupun for reverse-engineering purposes. Sebab byk aplikasi yang dapat hasil teknologi misil .... especially in terms of homegrown aerospace industry applications. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China Lays Out Its GA Plan
May 3, 2011
By Russ Niles, Editor-in-Chief
The recent buying spree of U.S. aviation companies by the Chinese appears to be a coordinated effort to ensure the country cashes in on the phased liberalization of airspace restrictions. People's Daily, the official organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, reported on Tuesday that state-owned AVIC International Holding Corporation recently completed its acquisition of Mobile, Ala.-based Teledyne Continental Motors and the purchase " will make AVIC International better prepared for the burgeoning general aviation market in the country. " It also touts the pending sale of Cirrus Aircraft to China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Company (CAIGA) " will greatly enhance CAIGA's production capacity, and help it meet the surging demand for general aviation aircraft as China looks to further open up its low-altitude airspace. " It's worth noting that CAIGA was formed in May of 2010, not long before reports began circulating that Cirrus was being sold to the Chinese. The deal was formally announced Feb. 28 and must still be approved by U.S. regulators.
People's Daily unveiled the timeline for the opening up of low-level airspace in China. It quotes Li Jiaxiang, director of the Civil Aviation Administration of China, as saying the plan is to phase in the airspace liberalization and have all airspace below 3,000 meters open by 2015. The plan was laid out pretty clearly in the story. " The development of the whole industry will be accelerated through cooperating with foreign companies and introducing advanced technologies to develop China's own products and intellectual property rights, " said Wang Xia, deputy president of the General Aviation College under the Civil Aviation University of China. " As foreign companies have limited knowledge of the domestic general aviation policies and operating system, domestic enterprises still have certain advantages. However, the advantages are temporary. We must advance with the times and continue to develop to maintain this advantage. "
Cirrus Finalizes China Deal
June 28, 2011
By Mary Grady, Contributing editor
Cirrus Aircraft and China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co., Ltd. (CAIGA) announced on Tuesday that the two companies have completed their merger. " This partnership will benefit our business and our customers, " said Brent Wouters, Cirrus CEO. " We share with CAIGA a vision of worldwide growth. CAIGA has the resources that will allow us to expedite our aircraft development programs and accelerate our global expansion. " He said he expects the merger will make it possible for Cirrus to expand its facilities and staff in Minnesota and North Dakota. Dale Klapmeier, Cirrus co-founder, said the completion of the merger was an important milestone in the company's history, and will make it possible for the company to " continue to lead the industry in bringing increased safety, performance, and comfort to the general aviation community. "
The deal caused considerable angst in the aviation community when it was announced in the spring, raising fears that the company would close down its U.S. operations and move to China. " Not gonna happen, " Klapmeier said in April. A Minnesota congressman, Chip Cravaack, raised questions about the deal, citing national-security concerns. "His concerns are unfounded," Klapmeier said in April, and apparently regulators have agreed. Klapmeier also said in April that moving forward with the Vision jet project is the top priority both for Cirrus and CAIGA. In Tuesday's announcement, CIAGA President Meng Xiangkai said, " We are very impressed with Cirrus' performance in the global general aviation industry. It has a very strong record of consistent product excellence, comprehensive safety features, an outstanding management team and a highly skilled workforce who operate from advanced production facilities. We look forward to working with Cirrus' management team to build upon its success and to expand production volume to further cement Cirrus' leadership position in the global general aviation industry. "
Sources : http://www.avweb.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Last Edit by HangPC2 at 5-5-2012 17:11
New designed universal chassis for PLA Army's MLRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 14-1-2011 10:32 AM
Author
