military tactics
kepada forumer-forumer..boleh tak kongsi atau share ape2 info pasal military tactics nih.kalau boleh kita mulakan dengan yang asas dulu macam "hammer and anvil" atau "flying wedges" yang digunakan oleh alexander the great.adakah tactics nih memang general2 plan awal2 atau tengah perang br nk plan?
macamana kita nak tw kita kene gunakan satu2 tactics ni sebelum berperang?
saya berminat pasal military tactics nih tapi xtaw nk mulakan dari mana.harap forumer2 dapat beri tunjuk ajar.. byk kalo nak bincang...
antaranye adelah
1. Infantry minor tactics
2. hull-down
3. shoot and scoot
4. fire & movement
5. ambush
6. guerrilla http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/2949/battlegaugameladecisive.gif
saya amik contoh perang gaugemala nih..tgk pasukan alexander ada membentuk satu wedge formation.apa kelebihan formation wedges nih.cmna kalau nk counter kalau musuh gunakan formation wedge nih?
kenapa alexander xserang dari left flank tentera parsi.kat situ ada satu gap yg terpisah.
pastuh kat tgh2 line tentera alexander ada satu gap..kalau berdasarkan rajah nih..gap kt tgh2 tuh suatu yg advantage atau sebaliknyer? http://kedarsoman.files.wordpress.com/2006/12/sinhgad_battle_risk_chart.jpg 2# lkick2113
kick,kita bincang yg simple2 dulu lah..dari segi formation tuh..kalau boleh start dari yg xpakai senapang dulu la. 2# lkick2113
kick,kita bincang yg simple2 dulu lah..dari segi formation tuh..kalau boleh start dari yg xpakai senapang dulu la.
baronista Post at 15-2-2010 23:49 http://forum.cari.com.my/images/common/back.gif
yg dulu2 punye wa x tau la....:lol: ape kata lu ulas secara ringkas buku sun zhu...the art of war... dari wiki....Roman military tactics...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/25/Rom-mnpl-1.png
As the army approached its enemy, the velites in front would throw their javelins at the enemy and then retreat through the gaps in the lines. This was an important innovation since in other armies of the period skirmishers would have to either retreat through their own armies ranks, causing confusion, or else flee around either flank of their own army. After the velites had retreated through the hastati, the 'posterior' century would march to the left and then forward so that they presented a solid line, creating a solid line of soldiers. The same procedure would be employed as they passed through the second and third ranks or turned to the side to channel down the gap between the first and second rows on route to help guard the legion's flanks
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/44/Rom-mnpl-2.png
At this point, the legion then presented a solid line to the enemy and the legion was in the correct formation for engagement. When the enemy closed, the hastati would charge. If they were losing the fight, the 'posterior' century returned to its position creating gaps again. Then the maniples would fall back through the gaps in the principes, who followed the same procedure to form a battle line and charge. If the principes could not break the enemy, they would retreat behind the triarii and the whole army would leave the battlefield in good order. According to some writers, the triarii formed a continuous line when they deployed, and their forward movement allowed scattered or discomfited units to rest and reform, to later rejoin the struggle.
The manipulator system allowed engaging every kind of enemy even in rough terrain, because the legion had both flexibility and toughness according to the deployment of its lines. Lack of a strong cavalry corps however, was a major flaw of the Roman forces.
In the later imperial army, the general deployment was very similar, with the cohorts deploying in quincunx pattern. In a reflection of the earlier placement of the veteran triarii in the rear, the less experienced cohorts - usually the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, and 8th - were in the front; the more experienced cohorts - 1st, 5th, 7th, 9th, and 10th - were placed behind xsilap aku..buku art of war lebih kepada konsep semasa berperang contoh laying plan,waging war,energy,weak point and strong..xtw la yg aku baca ni versoin lain.. aku nk kongsi mengenai satu strategi jerman pada WWII..
strategi ni mmg berkesan untuk tentera2 jerman pada masa itu..
ia dipanggil sebagai Blitzkrieg. Membawa maksud sbgai serangan Kilat. Taktik ini dipelopori oleh seorang Jeneral jerman iaitu,Heinz Guderian untuk menggantikan taktik bertahan dan statik pada WWI. kebanyakan pada masa WWI menggunakan parit sbagai taktik untuk bertahan dan menyerang apabila keadaan mmerlukan.
Taktik Blitzkrieg adalah mudah, serang secara mengejut dengan mengerah bala tentera dan segala kelengkapan seperti tank iaitu penzer, jet pejuang iaitu Lutwaffe dan meriam2 mudah alih untuk menyerang secara mengejut kepada musuh. Serangan mengejut ini mengakibatkan moral musuh akan merudum teruk kerana kurangnya persediaan mereka menghadapi serangan besar2an.
Taktik ini memberi kejayaan seperti serangan ke atas Poland dan Soviet Union.
di bawah adalah tata rajah taktik Blitzkrieg:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ms/8/81/GermanBreakthroughUSArmy.png thanks kick..ni la yg aku cari2..:loveliness: http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/1034/mplfrmvariations.png 10# cronicle86
wahh!!sekali tengok macam perfect je taktik blitzkrieg nih.. enemy yg terperangkap dalam bulatan tu rasenyer susah nk keluar tuh.:funk:
tapi tgk taktik blitzkrieg ni sesuai digunakan bila enemy belum ready. 13# baronista
perfect untuk jangka masa pendek ajer la.. betul jugak..tp bkn ker main purpose blitzkrieg ni untuk conquer satu2 tmpat dalam masa yg singkat?
blitzkrieg ni mmg sesuai x untuk implement dalam semua jenis perang? sesuai di gunakan kalau negara yang nak di tawan tu kecik la..
kalau besar sangat macam russia tu payah la..
logistik dan reinforcement tu lagi penting dari wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_walaja
double envelopment tactical manoeuvre
http://i.imgur.com/AgyoT.gif Post Last Edit by baronista at 16-2-2010 09:09
double envelopment
The pincer movement or double envelopment is a military maneuver. The flanks of the opponent are attacked simultaneously in a pinching motion after the opponent has advanced towards the center of an army which is responding by moving its outside forces to the enemy's flanks, in order to surround it. At the same time, a second layer of pincers attacks on the more extreme flanks, so as to prevent any attempts to reinforce the target unit. Most infantry combat, on every scale, is based in some fashion on this military tactic and it is commonly used by aircraft as well.
A double envelopment by definition leads to the attacking army facing the enemy in front, on both flanks, and in the rear. If the attacking pincers link up in the enemy's rear, the enemy is encircled. Such battles often end in surrender or destruction of the enemy force, although the encircled force can attempt a breakout, attacking the encirclement from the inside in order to escape, or a friendly external force can attack from the outside to open up an escape route for the encircled force.
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/2386/battlecannaedestruction.gif
antara perang yg gunakan taktik nih
- battle of cannae
- battle of hte trebia
- battle of walaja
- battle of manzikert
source : wikipedia Tentera Islam sendiri hampir terjerat dengan double envelopment menuver ni masa Pertempuran Uhud.
Pages:
[1]
2