gancity Publish time 13-10-2006 09:24 AM

Reply #11 mat_toro's post

they put in Taiwan? tis i not sure as i know onli they put alot fighter jet at foregin country...by the way matador may not affect out PT-91M

mat_toro Publish time 13-10-2006 09:38 AM

Originally posted by gancity at 13-10-2006 09:24 AM
they put in Taiwan? tis i not sure as i know onli they put alot fighter jet at foregin country...by the way matador may not affect out PT-91M

They don't have enough land to store them...

Matador may not have effect??And the basis of this claim is??

Debmey Publish time 13-10-2006 09:56 AM

Originally posted by mat_toro at 13-10-2006 09:21 AM
Singapore dont invest in tanks?? are you claiming all the Challenger/Chieftain Class tanks you guys put in Taiwan are sold off as scrap already??Singapore has no tanks??


Those are old Centurion tanks lah. bought 2nd hand long time ago. Not chieftain or Challenger.
We just upgrade our light AMX13s to kill tanks and for close fieldfirepower.
In other words, hardly any investments into battle tanks.

mat_toro Publish time 13-10-2006 10:20 AM

Originally posted by Debmey at 13-10-2006 09:56 AM



Those are old Centurion tanks lah. bought 2nd hand long time ago. Not chieftain or Challenger.
We just upgrade our light AMX13s to kill tanks and for close fieldfirepower.
In other word ...

aiyahh... thanks for correcting me... I knew it was Brit model but forgot which type

But tanks still have their relevancy on open terrain...
maybe not for singapore's terrain which is why you don't need tanks in the first place... but our terrain still relevant...

Debmey Publish time 13-10-2006 11:28 AM

Originally posted by gancity at 13-10-2006 09:24 AM
they put in Taiwan? tis i not sure as i know onli they put alot fighter jet at foregin country...by the way matador may not affect out PT-91M


I do not know the penetration power of Matador but since it is a new weapon, I think it can take on ERA. Its a very light and short weapon, great for infantry.

mat_toro Publish time 13-10-2006 11:42 AM

Originally posted by Debmey at 13-10-2006 11:28 AM



I do not know the penetration power of Matador but since it is a new weapon, I think it can take on ERA. Its a very light and short weapon, great for infantry.

Is it a dedicated anti-armor or more towards anti-personnel??

Debmey Publish time 13-10-2006 12:14 PM

anti personnel can use M203.

mat_toro Publish time 13-10-2006 12:22 PM

Reply #18 Debmey's post

203 have trouble clearing out bunkers... it's a projectile... not a rocket propelled armament... accuracy in combat and in a hurry also lousy... have to raise body to launch & expose yourself...

ef/x Publish time 13-10-2006 12:53 PM

http://www.defense-update.com/images/matador-mp.gif

Some info about Matador..

http://www.mindef.gov.sg/weapons/matador/weapontalk.htm

the RAFAEL (Israeli) connection...

http://www.defense-update.com/directory/spike-sr.htm

[ Last edited byef/x at 13-10-2006 12:55 PM ]

Nick_Perelman Publish time 14-10-2006 01:12 AM

This trials story is nonsense.

iqbalpc Publish time 14-10-2006 01:55 PM

kekuatan tentera rusia

ade sape2 tau tak kekuatan sebenar tentera rusia

bravotwozero Publish time 14-10-2006 02:06 PM

kekuatannya...terletak pada huruf 'R'........


sorry joking...

Robotech Publish time 14-10-2006 02:36 PM

Kekuatan tentera Russia terletak kepada Strategic Missile Troop - kekuatan persenjataan misil yg dilengkapi persenjataan misil anti-pesawat udara, misil jarak dekat/ sederhana/, misil antara benua, misil taktikal nuklear.

Selain itu, kelebihan kuantiti dalam aset armor, artileri, udara & laut membolehkan Russia terus digeruni oleh negara lain, termasuk US.

Kekuatan Russia juga adalah keseluruhanindustri persenjataan yg mampu digerakpindah dlm masa yg singkat sekiranya berlaku sebarang konflik penaklukan ke tanahair Russia. Malahan, kelebihan Russia juga terletak kepada setiap anakwatan (lelaki & perempuan) yg boleh dikerah sepenuh masa untuk mempertahan 'Motherland'.

areguard Publish time 14-10-2006 06:47 PM

Walau macamana kuat pun Rusia ni, terkencit jugak pekena dengan pejuang Chechen...La ni Rusia dah nak bergocoh dengan Georgia pulak....Putin ..Putin

zarul427 Publish time 14-10-2006 08:37 PM

hi


russia defence doctrine stated that the main objective to depend on :


1.large armed forces

2.modern and superb navy armanda

3.ballastic missile


i wonder where is russia main naval base in Vladivostok....still fuctioning well....


regards



zarul

iqbalpc Publish time 14-10-2006 08:46 PM

tapi kenape rusia ni tak agrasif macam us ek....klau rusia lebih menonjol mesti us tak berani nak buat macam2...

Gemukkkkkkk Publish time 14-10-2006 09:29 PM

Reply #3 Robotech's post

whoaaa brader.. cantekkk avatar..teringat zaman wa kecik-kecik dulu.. sikit-sikit main board rpg..sikit-sikit cari protoculture cache keh keh keh..

sori off-topik kejap..

zarul427 Publish time 14-10-2006 09:30 PM

moscow has been checked from become superpower and its economic deteroting.

remember iraq 's armed forces is a small scale of russian amy and defeated by allied forces led by us during gulf war 1 &2.

bravotwozero Publish time 14-10-2006 11:49 PM

kekuatannya terletak kepada 3 perkara:

1. Nuclear Deterrence
2. Communisme Influence
3. Big Arm dealer and supplier

bravotwozero Publish time 14-10-2006 11:53 PM

Originally posted by iqbalpc at 14-10-2006 08:46 PM
tapi kenape rusia ni tak agrasif macam us ek....klau rusia lebih menonjol mesti us tak berani nak buat macam2...

coz, russia economical influence on the world market is very weak except for Arm dealings............therefore they dont have big capital as per USA.......

Russia should follow China in term of ecomomic strategies.......
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
View full version: Russian Armed Forces Gallery And Discussion Thread


ADVERTISEMENT