13Friday Publish time 12-12-2006 01:35 PM

about that thread - God stop dubious people- closed

Reporting this to you for different opinions.


You call it nature.

I call that God's action on the ways to teach His people.

Nature cannot be so perfect as this.


Bad people derserve to suffer more so that they learn the hard way.


The unwritten things are for people to discern and that is Religion in the truth and the spirit.

God's gifted people can discern that way.


So it is for some of us to show God's way of doing things so often mentioned in the Bible.


So this thread is relevant but hard to bite for some people.

BeanDiesel Publish time 12-12-2006 01:40 PM


The thread has been reopened and will stay open provided you meet the condition that I laid out in my message to you.

As a general rule, an article by itself cannot attempt to make itself relevant to the board. We as the user of the article must find and explain the link between the article and a topic that is relevant to the purpose of this board.

Thank you.

BeanDiesel Publish time 15-12-2006 05:29 PM


Just wanna let y'all know that I'll be away for a few days. I'm moving to another city for my first job. So I may not have internet connection for a few days (if I can afford it at all). So, please keep it civil. :)

ElehBodoh Publish time 20-12-2006 12:51 AM

asal korang still benarkan copy pasta ah, dahlah 3rd party reference sumber ntahmana je,tutup jelah ,lagi pun space wasting, aku nak korang argue dgn aku kenapa kita perlu benda copy pasta cam ni, kalau digunakan sebagai reference wikipedia ke apa2 aku tak kisahlah sgt ni sampai bukak thread ,letak copy pasta lepas tu teruh belah cam bangang debmey tu kekeke bukannya nak letak argument. So amacam.

BeanDiesel Publish time 21-12-2006 12:28 PM


I'm back.

BeanDiesel Publish time 21-12-2006 12:30 PM

Originally posted by ElehBodoh at 12/19/06 08:51 AM
asal korang still benarkan copy pasta ah, dahlah 3rd party reference sumber ntahmana je,tutup jelah ,lagi pun space wasting, aku nak korang argue dgn aku kenapa kita perlu benda copy pasta cam ni,...


Thank you for your input.
Actually DVP and I discussed about that a while ago. Yes we do not recommend opening such threads. However for the past couple of months we have been busy with other commitments. We will try to resume the discussion.

13Friday Publish time 8-1-2007 01:05 AM

reading access 250

why thread closed ?


the PM pix is the reason???

3 political, Islamic and another materialised on 7th January, 2007 and this confirm my prediction of the greatest BOMB with reading access 250.....



flood more then.....



I clicked on with reading access 6, then suddenly it was 250, when BD just moderated it.

that is the biggestbomb.

[ Last edited by13Friday at 8-1-2007 01:24 AM ]

BeanDiesel Publish time 11-1-2007 10:35 AM

Originally posted by 13Friday at 1/7/07 09:05 AM
why thread closed ?


the PM pix is the reason???

3 political, Islamic and another materialised on 7th January, 2007 and this confirm my prediction of the greatest BOMB with reading access...

I apologized for not responding earlier. I didn't notice the post as at the time I was also busy preparing for my first day of work.
To answer your inquiry, the reason of the threads temporary closure had nothing to do with the PM picture. It was closed in order to protect the privacy of a member while the course of action was evaluated.

Thank you.

13Friday Publish time 12-1-2007 07:09 PM

pix removed

some pix and posting removed after re-open.


protect which member???

BeanDiesel Publish time 13-1-2007 11:37 AM

Originally posted by 13Friday at 1/12/07 03:09 AM
some pix and posting removed after re-open.

I only deleted 3 posts before it's reopened, and they were all mine. I did not touch anyone else's post, including yours. If you believe an image disappear, you are free to repost it. Once again, it has nothing to do with the feds.


protect which member???

The whole point is to keep that information confidential.

DARSITA Publish time 14-2-2007 03:51 AM

Dear member

When making a new thread please avoid using this button ->


Just click that will be enough.

Thank you

me Publish time 24-2-2007 07:08 PM

from RSF Greneral Guidelines:

GRACIOUS BEHAVIOUR
Previous rule still applies. There should be no rude comments, flaming, bashing and personal attack.

Troll the Forum.
Trolling is the posting of messages intended to spark a fight or stirring up trouble or to incite disruption.

Slander Unconstructive Remarks.
Do not make any kind of this type of remarks against other religion,race or other forum member that could be detrimental to the wellbeingof the RSF board. This include calling the person's religion or holy book as fake/false/corrupted. - - - - Updated 15/5/2006

but why is these allowed?


http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=265324&extra=page%3D1

Yes, you are right

"JESUS" are so LOOOOVING yet another people killed him.


kharrrrr   kharrrr    kharrrrr


http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=265076&extra=page%3D1


Yes, you are right Arissa_Sofea, Barney just good in Cut and Paste.

This old man got no ball when come to defence his Hinduism.

kharrr   kharrr   kharrrr


http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=261119&extra=page%3D1&page=2

theres too many kharrr   kharrr



WLIO Publish time 25-2-2007 02:08 AM

How about this one ?

Why you never complaint

http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=261119&extra=page%3D1&page=3

Ahahahhahahahah............... muslims stuck.ahhahahahahahahahah............................

http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=265324&extra=page%3D1

hehehehehe........... look at the three muslims here.
haven't they seen the threads of blind hatred started by muslims on this forum?


I seee muslim hypocrisy here. Ahahahahahahahah...................

cheers and peace



Some hypocrite cannot face reality.ahahahaqhahahahahaha................

cheers


Ahahahahahahhaha.....................

why so many Ahahahahahahahah...................

[ Last edited byWLIO at 25-2-2007 02:28 AM ]

me Publish time 25-2-2007 10:19 AM

Originally posted by WLIO at 25-2-2007 02:08 AM
How about this one ?

Why you never complaint



i did.


http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=261119&extra=page%3D1&page=2

WLIO Publish time 25-2-2007 02:37 PM

Originally posted by me at 25-2-2007 10:19 AM


i did.


http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthr ... page%3D1&page=2


I did not see you complaint about AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA by Debmey


instead you complaint about mykharrrr   kharrrrkharrrrr


don't be double standard

me Publish time 25-2-2007 07:16 PM

Originally posted by WLIO at 25-2-2007 02:37 PM



I did not see you complaint about AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA by Debmey


instead you complaint about mykharrrr   kharrrrkharrrrr


don't be double standard

well, for one thing, your kharr kharr kharr is big and red, its very hard to miss.

BeanDiesel Publish time 3-3-2007 12:28 PM

Originally posted by me at 2/24/07 03:08 AM


but why is these allowed?


http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthr ... &extra=page%3D1




http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthr ... &extra=page%3D1





...

My goodness I was totally unaware of these complaints. For that I apologize.
Well, for your information, whatever we say in the guidelines are simply our recommendations. They are not meant to be enforced, unless otherwise stated. So in the case of excessive laugh, although it can be considered unnecessary, is not necessarily illegal.

But I'm hoping that everyone is aware of what they're saying. If you (not you you, you in general, anybody) laugh about as much as you talk, chances are you don't really have enough material to remain noticable. They say empty cans rattle the most.



But saying that Barney has no ********* for example is not allowed since it falls under abusive personal attack category.

me Publish time 6-3-2007 07:10 PM

Originally posted by BeanDiesel at 3-3-2007 12:28 PM


My goodness I was totally unaware of these complaints. For that I apologize.
Well, for your information, whatever we say in the guidelines are simply our recommendations. They are not meant...

coundnt agree more.

but what if the laught was something like this

"JESUS" are so LOOOOVING yet another people killed him.


kharrrrr   kharrrr    kharrrrr

WLIO Publish time 7-3-2007 12:01 AM

Originally posted by me at 6-3-2007 07:10 PM


coundnt agree more.

but what if the laught was something like this



What's wrong with the laughing

why don't you bring up Debmey's laughing   ahahahahahahaha   hahahahahahah    heheheheheheh

DivinePonytail Publish time 7-3-2007 08:44 AM

Dear "me",

We dont ban "kharr kharr khar" or "ahaha ahaha ahaha" or "wah wah wah". RSF members are allowed to express themselves as long its is within RSF guidelines and rules.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
View full version: Complaints, Suggestions and Feedback


ADVERTISEMENT