Ini Berita Baik Untuk Golongan Anti-Vaksin.
Edited by tipahketipung at 12-7-2021 02:17 AMPublished: Jul 08, 2021 Veterinary Drug for COVID-19 Patients? Studies Present Confusing Case
Ivermectin is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, both caused by parasitic worms. It is typically for veterinary use. The drug has anti-inflammatory properties. It has also been approved as a topical treatment for head lice. It has become something of a contentious issue as to whether it effectively prevents and treats COVID-19.
Several studies have been published suggesting it is effective, while others have indicated it is not. In late June, the American Journal of Therapeutics analyzed data from 24 clinical trials of ivermectin for COVID-19 up to April 25, 2021. The authors analyzed the studies, extracted data and assessed for the risk of bias.
This meta-analysis, they wrote, “moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-COV-2 pandemic globally.” The authors’ statements appear, in analysis, to be problematic.
On the other hand, the FDA has an ongoing webpage titled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.” It has four primary points..
[*] is that it is not approved for COVID-19 in humans and is not an anti-viral drug.
[*] taking large doses is dangerous and can cause serious harm.
[*]“If you have a prescription for ivermectin for an FDA-approved use, get it from a legitimate source and take it exactly as prescribed.” And fourth, don’t use drugs intended for animals.
The FDA also points out that ivermectin is used in some animals to prevent heartworm and other parasites, but these are very different products than the ones for people. They’re not safe for humans.
Chuck Dinerstein, director of Medicine at the American Council on Science and Health, a vascular surgeon, published an article on July 7 titled, “Could We Be Wrong About Ivermectin And COVID-19?” He starts the article by saying, “I do not believe Ivermectim is useful, but I could be wrong…. A new study demonstrates how a rush to publish, (and possibly treat) may have resulted in poorly designed studies where a quiet signal is lost in an abundance of noise.”
And yet another meta-analysis, this one published June 28 in Clinical Infectious Diseases, concluded, “In comparison to SOC or placebo, IVM (ivermectin) did not reduce all-cause mortality, length of stay or viral clearance in RCTs in COVID-19 patients with mostly mild disease. IVM did not have an effect on AEs (adverse events) or severe AEs. IVM is not a viable option to treat COVID-19 patients.”
https://www.biospace.com/article/the-ivermectin-covid-19-problem-meta-analysis-and-questionable-studies/
{:1_565:}{:1_565:}{:1_565:}
aku tanya geng #antivaxxwithmosus apa kaboooooo~? Dear Folks who choose to remain blinded=>
Here is another doctor for you to disbelieve and to try and discredit:
DR. DARRELL WOLFE TELLS EVERYONE WHAT'S COMING
Code:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/czHIqaqYIWk4/
And for anyone who could use a tongue-in-cheek bit of humour today...:
When the 'Administration' Knocks On Your Door…
Code:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UKnkkJKAGHPu/
Disclaimer:
- As stated many times here - I personally have ZERO interest in ALL things pole-eee-tick-uhl;
- I am not any sort of 'medical' anything nor do I ever claim to be such. "Others have indicated it is not." Such a powerful arcane syllabus. Saintis boleh beli.
Data boleh manipulasi. kerunai replied at 11-7-2021 03:55 AM
Dear Folks who choose to remain blinded=>
Here is another doctor for you to disbelieve and to try ...
Hahaha... one down!
Koyak....Next?
{:1_570:}
Kenapa page ni koyak? tipahketipung replied at 11-7-2021 12:01 PM
Hahaha... one down!
Koyak....Next?
can't even reply to the video
what a jerk .. ;)
<h1>This is a test</h1> dua_chzy replied at 11-7-2021 11:59 AM
Saintis boleh beli.
Data boleh manipulasi.
Your are right kaka. I sokong u. dua_chzy replied at 11-7-2021 03:59 AM
Saintis boleh beli.
Data boleh manipulasi.
Kasi link thesis dan medical journal engko dek..
Akak nak baca.
Musti hebat ni.:lol:
cari forum dah kena hack dgn isrohelll kerunai replied at 11-7-2021 04:07 AM
can't even reply to the video
what a jerk .. ;)
Starting argument dengan namecalling?
Speak for yourself lah. :lol:
drugs intended for animals
moderate-certainty evidence
:L ultra78 replied at 11-7-2021 04:10 AM
This is a test
Tis is a test. :shutup:
tNO_I7BFkx8
Apa khabar geng anti vaksin?;P Babai replied at 11-7-2021 04:51 AM
Apa khabar geng anti vaksin?
Mesti lah #TenangIsGood braderrr.
Sambil kunyah2 tempe jgak. ;P
iols sedih on behalf :( kat sini ader ke yang anti vaksin? i bila ade systematic review by Cochrane then i percaya. Atau pun team KKM buat conclusion.
if not bagi yg bukan dlm field , they can just say anything, feed on speculative assumptions. Understood.
lagipun kanDG KKM dah keluarkan kenyataan, so tunggulah keputusan kajian.
mbhcsf replied at 11-7-2021 05:03 AM
i bila ade systematic review by Cochrane then i percaya. Atau pun team KKM buat conclusion.
if no ...
Smart!
Jangan jadi diaorang...
Seolah-olah sangattt!
https://i.postimg.cc/jSMpnnbS/Warning.jpg